*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Tell Bush and Congress:
Don't Release Luis Posada Carriles!
Extradite Posada to Venezuela
https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Advocacy?JServSessionIdr006=238mdc75w3.app8a&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=159

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

ARTICLES IN FULL:
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

1) Reflections by the Commander in Chief
A BRUTAL REPLY
Fidel Castro Ruz
April 10, 2007
http://www.cuba.cu/gobierno/discursos/2007/ing/f100407i.html

2) Now the South Erupts
Inter Press Service
Ali al-Fadhily*
http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/hard_news/archives/iraq/000564.php#more

3) Cuban Youth Searching for Their Inner Selves
Juventud Rebelde reveals the finding of its Third National Survey of Youth
2007-04-10 | 13:31:23 EST
http://www.juventudrebelde.co.cu/cuba/2007-04-10/cuban-youth-searching-for-their-inner-selves-/

4) Paying the Price
By BOB HERBERT
Op-Ed Columnist
April 12, 2007
http://select.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/opinion/12herbert.html?hp

5) Four Years Later in Iraq
Editorial
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/opinion/12thu1.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

6) Civilian Claims on U.S. Suggest the Toll of War
By PAUL von ZIELBAUER
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/world/middleeast/12abuse.html?hp

7) U.S. Suspects That Iran Aids Both Sunni and Shiite Militias
By ALISSA J. RUBIN
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/world/middleeast/12iraq.html?ref=world

8) About Creation, Pope Melds Faith With Science
By IAN FISHER
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/world/europe/12pope.html

9) Life in Iraq Worsening, Red Cross Says
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/world/middleeast/12redcross.html

10) 4 Years On, the Gap Between Iraq Policy
and Practice Is Wide
By DAVID E. SANGER
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/world/middleeast/12policy.html

11) Panel on Walter Reed Woes Issues Strong Rebuke
By SCOTT SHANE
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12medical.html?ref=us

12) As His Time Grows Short, a Dog Seeks a Reprieve
By PAUL VITELLO
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/nyregion/12dog.html

13) The Blinded Leading the Blind
A Jones for Justice
Connecting the Dots: Law, Slavery, and Immigration
By Dr. John Calvin Jones, PhD, JD
BC Columnist
www.blackcommentator.com/225/225_jones_for_justice_law_slavery_immigration_pf.html

14) REFLECTIONS OF PRESIDENT FIDEL CASTRO
"More than three billion people in the world condemned
to premature death from hunger and thirst."
March 28, 2007
Fidel Castro.
Translated by Granma International
[This email was sent as a service by Roland Sheppard.
My website is http://web.mac.com/rolandgarret . Read
my book, The View From The Painter's Ladder available
at Amazon.com]

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

1) Reflections by the Commander in Chief
A BRUTAL REPLY
Fidel Castro Ruz
April 10, 2007
http://www.cuba.cu/gobierno/discursos/2007/ing/f100407i.html

George W. Bush is undoubtedly the most genuine representative of a system of
terror forced on the world by the technological, economic and political
superiority of the most powerful country known to this planet. For this
reason, we share the tragedy of the American people and their ethical
values. The instructions for the verdict issued by Judge Kathleen Cardone,
of the El Paso Federal Court last Friday, granting Luis Posada Carriles
freedom on bail, could only have come from the White House.

It was President Bush himself who ignored at all times the criminal and
terrorist nature of the defendant who was protected with a simple accusation
of immigration violation leveled at him. The reply is brutal. The government
of the United States and its most representative institutions had already
decided to release the monster.

The backgrounds are well-known and reach far back. The people who trained
him and ordered him to destroy a Cuban passenger plane in midair, with 73
athletes, students and other Cuban and foreign travelers on board, together
with its dedicated crew; those who bought his freedom while the terrorist
was held in prison in Venezuela, so that he could supply and practically
conduct a dirty war against the people of Nicaragua, resulting in the loss
of thousands of lives and the devastation of a country for decades to come;
those who empowered him to smuggle with drugs and weapons making a mockery
of the laws of Congress; those who collaborated with him to create the
terrible Operation Condor and to internationalize terror; the same who
brought torture, death and often the physical disappearance of hundreds of
thousands of Latin Americans, could not possibly act any different.

Even though Bush‚s decision was to be expected, it is certainly no less
humiliating for our people. Thanks to the revelations of „Por Esto!‰ a
Mexican publication from the state of Quintana Roo later complemented by our
own sources, Cuba knew with absolute precision how Posada Carriles entered
from Central America, via Cancun, to the Isla Mujeres departing from there
on board the Santrina, after the ship was inspected by the Mexican federal
authorities, heading with other terrorists straight to Miami.

Denounced and publicly challenged with exact information on the matter,
since April 15, 2005, it took the government of that country more than a
month to arrest the terrorist, and a year and two months to admit that Luis
Posada Carriles had entered through the Florida coast illegally on board the
Santrina, a presumed school-ship licensed in the United States.

Not a single word is said of his countless victims, of the bombs he set off
in tourist facilities in recent years, of his dozens of plans financed by
the government of the United States to physically eliminate me.

It was not enough for Bush to offend the name of Cuba by installing a
horrible torture center similar to Abu Ghraib on the territory illegally
occupied in Guantánamo, horrifying the world with this procedure. The cruel
actions of his predecessors seemed not enough for him. It was not enough to
force a poor and underdeveloped country like Cuba to spend 100 billion
dollars. To accuse Posada Carriles was tantamount to accusing himself.

Throughout almost half a century, everything was fair game against our small
island lying 90 miles away from its coast, wanting to be independent.
Florida saw the installation of the largest station for intelligence and
subversion that ever existed on this planet.

It was not enough to send a mercenary invasion on the Bay of Pigs, costing
us 176 dead and more than 300 wounded at a time when the few medical
specialists they left us had no experience treating war wounds.

Earlier still, the French ship La Coubre carrying Belgian weapons and
grenades for Cuba had exploded on the docks of Havana Harbor. The two well
synchronized explosions caused the deaths of more than 100 workers and
wounded others as many of them tool part in the rescue attempts.

It was not enough to have the Missile Crisis of 1962, which brought the
world to the brink of an all-consuming thermonuclear war, at a time when
there were bombs 50 times more powerful than the ones dropped on Hiroshima
and Nagasaki.

It was not enough to introduce in our country viruses, bacteria and fungi to
attack plantations and flocks; and incredible as it may seem, to attack
human beings. Some of these pathogens came out of American laboratories and
were brought to Cuba by well-known terrorists in the service of the United
States government.

Add to all this the enormous injustice of keeping five heroic patriots
imprisoned for supplying information about terrorist activities; they were
condemned in a fraudulent manner to sentences that include two life
sentences and they stoically withstand cruel mistreatment, each of them in a
different prison.

Time and again the Cuban people have fearlessly faced the threat of death.
They have demonstrated that with intelligence, using appropriate tactics and
strategies, and especially preserving unity around their political and
social vanguard, there can be no force on this earth capable of defeating
them.

I think that the coming May Day celebration would be the ideal day for our
people, --using the minimum of fuel and transportation-- to show their
feelings to the workers and the poor of the world.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

2) Now the South Erupts
Inter Press Service
Ali al-Fadhily*
http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/hard_news/archives/iraq/000564.php#more

BASRA, Apr 11 (IPS) - The eruption of demonstrations in the
south of Iraq this week could rob the occupation forces of
what was considered a critical bastion of support.

The southern areas of Iraq have long been said to be secure,
and people there peaceful towards the occupation forces. Iraqis
living in the south were also believed to be cooperative with
the occupation to the extent that they supported administrative
steps taken by successive Iraqi governments.

The majority of the population of the south are Shia Muslims,
and Iraq has had Shia- dominated governments under the occupation.

But demonstrations against the occupation and the United States
by hundreds of thousands of angry Shias in Najaf, Kut and other
cities across the south Apr. 9 mark a sharp break from a policy
of cooperation. Protesters demanded an end to the U.S.-led
occupation, burnt U.S. flags and chanted "Death to America!"

Brig. Gen. Abdul Karim al-Mayahi, a police commander in Najaf,
told reporters that at least half a million people joined the
demonstration there.

Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, a U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad,
told reporters, "We say that we're here to support democracy.
We say that free speech and freedom of assembly are part of that.
While we don't necessarily agree with the message, we agree with
their right to say it."

Clashes after the demonstration left at least one U.S. soldier
dead and another wounded in Diwaniyah, 180 km south of Baghdad.

"We have been patient and we have sacrificed a lot thinking the
situation would be better one day soon," Hussein Ali, a teacher
from Diwaniyah told IPS. "The result we see now is that we were
dragged into a swamp of hatred between brothers, and that all
the bloodshed was for the sake of war leaders to get more power
and fortune."

Fighting is continuing in Diwaniyah between the occupation
forces and the Mehdi Army led by Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.
Additional U.S. and Iraqi troops have been brought into the city
to make arrests and carry out door-to-door raids in search
of illegal weapons and wanted militiamen.

Muqtada al-Sadr, quiet for a considerable period after clashing
with U.S. troops early on in the occupation period, publicly
called on his militia to attack occupation troops.

So far this month, five occupation troops have been killed
every day on average, according to U.S. Department
of Defence figures.

The new Shia armed uprising, which appears to be in its early
days, is a further blow to occupation forces that are already
stretched thin.

"Four years of patience and what do we get?" Ali Hashim,
a merchant from the southern city Basra told IPS. "We got
nothing but the loss of our country to those who spoke a lot
but did nothing. The United States failed us and sold us cheap
to those who would have no mercy on us."

Mahmood al-Lamy, a historian from Basra told IPS the situation
there was critical.

"Basra is the biggest southern city and the only Iraqi city
that has a port near the Gulf. It is now controlled by various
militias who fight each other from time to time over an oil
smuggling business that is flourishing under the occupation."

Lamy said residents fear that "the situation here will be
a lot worse in the coming months due to disputes that are
appearing between major parties."

Lamy was referring to the withdrawal last month of the al-Fadhila
Party from the Shia Islamic Coalition Parliament Group, and the
dismissal of two ministers from the al-Sadr movement as
a punishment for contacting U.S. officials in Nasiriyah
in southern Iraq.

The Shia political group is increasingly divided over many
issues, and it seems unlikely that it will hold together.
But many of the groups are increasingly opposed to the
occupation.

"We were late to realise that we were wrong about U.S.
intentions," Salman Yassen of the Basra city municipality
council told IPS. "We waited four years while U.S. and Iraqi
authorities kept us busy fighting each other while they were
setting the plan of stealing our oil and tearing our country
apart so that their allies would feel safe."

Four years of the occupation of Iraq have seen many changes
in U.S. strategies, ambassadors and tactics, but the changes
may be too little, too late.

"The delay in moving politically has cost Iraq, the U.S.
and many other countries a great deal," former Iraqi police
colonel Ahmed Jabbar told IPS in Baghdad. "The least to be
said is that the world would have been better off without
this occupation and the catastrophic security disturbance
it has caused."

*(Ali, our correspondent in Baghdad, works in close collaboration
with Dahr Jamail, our U.S.-based specialist writer on Iraq who
travels extensively in the region)

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

3) Cuban Youth Searching for Their Inner Selves
Juventud Rebelde reveals the finding of its Third National Survey of Youth
2007-04-10 | 13:31:23 EST
http://www.juventudrebelde.co.cu/cuba/2007-04-10/cuban-youth-searching-for-their-inner-selves-/

The Cuban Center for Youth Studies (CESJ in Spanish) carried
out an important investigation – not only learn about young
people more deeply, but to encourage further studies.

The Third National Survey of Youth was given to more than
3,000 youngsters, ranging from 15 to 29 years of age, all
living in urban areas in all the provinces of the island.
The survey looked into conditions and influences, which
included their socio-demographic characteristics, housing
and economic conditions, education and employment situation,
and leisure opportunities.

Below, JR describes the youth interviewed and the
survey findings.

Looking Inside

For French writer Honore de Balzac, marriage was
“in the end, a passionate battle where spouses ask
for God’s blessing because loving ‘until death do
us part’ is the most frightful of tasks.” Maybe
this is why our youth suffer gamophobia (the fear
of marriage). Consequently, as the survey reveals,
most of them are still singles.

Another of the questions addressed is the sensitive
problem of housing, a major challenge facing Cuban
society as a whole, and which is also experienced
by youth. More than the 50 percent of them live
in houses with construction problems.

Interviewees complained about space and structural
conditions of their houses, considering them insufficient
for their development. Housing issues, family dependence
and a lack of privacy are their principal dilemmas.

Still, it’s revealing that 72.3 percent have their
own room or a minimally shared room. Overcrowding
tends to be more frequent in substandard housing.

The Pocket Economy

Although the Cuban economy moved forward and overcame
the harsh recession of the 1990s, people’s pockets
didn’t seem to catch up that fast. The household budget
of Cubans must still adjust to shortages.

Most interviewees are economically dependent on
other people. Most of them live in the eastern
region of the island, are women and range between
the ages of 15 and 29.

The survey demonstrated that youth spend their incomes
in the same way as the rest of the population: on food,
clothes, shoes, and household expenses. Women and young
adult share their income in accordance with other people’s
needs or with those of the home.

Seeking the Other Half

Some youngsters read through the horoscope to learn
of their fortune in affairs of the heart, or to look
for secret aphrodisiacs or some other sort of aid to
make them luckier in their pursuits. If you ask them
about one of their main goals, with no hesitation they
will answer: finding a partner. The same sentiments
were expressed by the investigators, especially the
women. They give top priority to this goal. Meanwhile
youth over 25 vehemently defended the right to be single.

Love and common likes are fundamental to a successful
relationship, asserted the youth, with all agreeing
that this was regardless of sex or age.

Regarding the prior study (the Second National Survey
of Youth), some of the youth’s priorities have shifted
in importance. Having children, in particular, has
dropped from the third to the seventh position —
an alarming sign given the unbalanced aging of
Cuban society.

Issues of greatest interest for this cohort were
those related to employment, leisure, personal
problems and future plans.

Employment on the Mind

The study demonstrated that over the 36 percent
of youth are students, while high school graduates
are 50 percent of this population and university
graduates 35.5 percent.

The largest part of the younger generation are
workers (37.7 percent). This group is made up mainly
of manual laborers, technicians, and service workers
— most of them working for the government.

When the study was carried out, most unemployed youth
spent their time doing house chores; the rest could
be divided into two groups: those who didn’t work
or study and those actively looking for employment.

Just as in the second national survey, the state
sector —along with the developing sector (tourism,
joint ventures, and publicly-run corporations) —
continue to be the most popular among youth.

Interviewees say their choice of field of employment
is closely related to the country’s economic situation,
the search for better working conditions as well
as the pay offered.

Prejudices and Stereotypes

Although hardly no teenagers and youth said they
had experienced rejection or mistreatment, they
highlighted certain prejudices and stereotypes that
go against the principles of Cuba’s socialist system.

A small number had experienced rejection within
society, owing to difference of opinion, their
economic situation, sex, or skin color.

Racial stereotypes have promoted discriminatory
behavior among adolescence and youth, especially
within the family and among couples.

The availability and use of free time was also
underlined as a problem. The majority said to have
little options for leisure. Likewise, there is a
tendency to fulfill those needs using personal
resources and not those provided by the government.

The primary aspirations of adolescence and youth
regarding family, studies, and employment go hand
in hand with the principles of Cuban society. Their
main aspirations are to find a partner, to strengthen
their present relationship, to go to college and work
in a field that allows them to satisfy their spiritual
and material needs.

Youth shift between reality and longings, between
dilemmas and the dreams of solving them. Cuban youth,
with its contradictions and challenges, is constructing
the destiny of our country — leading the way to humanism,
like the morning precedes the day.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

4) Paying the Price
By BOB HERBERT
Op-Ed Columnist
April 12, 2007
http://select.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/opinion/12herbert.html?hp

You knew something was up early in the day. As soon
as I told executives at MSNBC that I was going to write
about the “60 Minutes” piece, which was already in pretty
wide circulation, they began acting very weird. We’ll
get back to you, they said.

In a “60 Minutes” interview with Don Imus broadcast
in July 1998, Mike Wallace said of the “Imus in the
Morning” program, “It’s dirty and sometimes racist.”

Mr. Imus then said: “Give me an example. Give me one
example of one racist incident.” To which Mr. Wallace
replied, “You told Tom Anderson, the producer,
in your car, coming home, that Bernard McGuirk
is there to do nigger jokes.”

Mr. Imus said, “Well, I’ve nev — I never
use that word.”

Mr. Wallace then turned to Mr. Anderson,
his producer. “Tom,” he said.

“I’m right here,” said Mr. Anderson.

Mr. Imus then said to Mr. Anderson, “Did I use
that word?”

Mr. Anderson said, “I recall you using
that word.”

“Oh, O.K.,” said Mr. Imus. “Well, then I used
that word. But I mean — of course, that was an
off-the-record conversation. But ——”

“The hell it was,” said Mr. Wallace.

The transcript was pure poison. A source very close
to Don Imus told me last night, “They did not want
to wait for your piece to come out.”

For MSNBC, Mr. Imus’s “nappy-headed ho’s” comment
about the Rutgers women’s basketball team was bad
enough. Putting the word “nigger” into the so-called
I-man’s mouth was beyond the pale.

The roof was caving in on Mr. Imus. More advertisers
were pulling the plug. And Bruce Gordon, a member
of the CBS Corp. board of directors and former head
of the N.A.A.C.P., said publicly that Mr. Imus
should be fired.

But some of the most telling and persuasive criticism
came from an unlikely source — internally at the
network that televised Mr. Imus’s program. Women,
especially, were angry and upset. Powerful statements
were made during in-house meetings by women at NBC
and MSNBC — about how black women are devalued in
this country, how they are demeaned by white men
and black men.

White and black women spoke emotionally about the
way black women are frequently trashed in the popular
culture, especially in music, and about the way
news outlets give far more attention to stories
about white women in trouble.

Phil Griffin, a senior vice president at NBC News
who oversaw the Imus show for MSNBC, told me yesterday,
“It touched a huge nerve.”

Whether or not Mr. McGuirk was hired for the specific
noxious purpose referred to in the “60 Minutes”
interview, he has pretty much lived up to that job
description. He’s a minstrel, a white man who has
gleefully led the Imus pack into some of the most
disgusting, degrading attempts at racial (not to
mention sexist) humor that it’s possible to imagine.

Blacks were jigaboos, Sambos and Brilloheads. Women
were bitches and, above all else, an endless variety
of ever-ready sexual vessels, born to be degraded.

The question now is how long the “Imus in the Morning”
radio show will last. Just last month, in a reference
to a speech by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton in Selma,
Ala., Mr. McGuirk called Mrs. Clinton a bitch and
predicted she would “have cornrows and gold teeth”
by the time her presidential primary campaign against
Senator Barack Obama is over.

Way back in 1994, a friend of mine, the late Lars-Erik
Nelson, a terrific reporter and columnist at The Daily
News and Newsday, mentioned an Imus segment that offered
a “satirical” rap song that gave advice to President
Clinton on what to do about Paula Jones: “Pimp-slap the
ho.” Mr. Nelson also wrote that there was a song on the
program dealing with Hillary Clinton’s menstrual cycle.

So this hateful garbage has been going on for a long,
long time. There was nothing new about the tone or the
intent of Mr. Imus’s “nappy-headed ho’s” comment.
As Bryan Monroe, president of the National Association
of Black Journalists, told me the other night, “It’s
a long pattern of behavior, and at some point somebody
has to say enough is enough.”

The crucial issue goes well beyond Don Imus’s pathetically
infantile behavior. The real question is whether this
controversy is loud enough to shock Americans at long
last into the realization of just how profoundly racist
and sexist the culture is.

It appears that on this issue the general public, and
the women at Mr. Imus’s former network, are far ahead
of the establishment figures, the politicians and the
media biggies, who were always so anxious to appear
on the show and to defend Mr. Imus.

That is a very good sign.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

5) Four Years Later in Iraq
Editorial
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/opinion/12thu1.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Four years ago this week, as American troops made their
first, triumphant entrance into Baghdad, joyous Iraqis
pulled down a giant statue of Saddam Hussein. It was
powerful symbolism — a murderous dictator toppled, Baghdad
is taking to the streets without fear, American soldiers
hailed as liberators.

After four years of occupation, untold numbers killed
by death squads and suicide bombers, and searing experiences
like Abu Ghraib, few Iraqis still look on American soldiers
as liberators. Instead, thousands marked this week’s
anniversary by burning American flags and marching
through the streets of Najaf chanting, “Death to America.”

Once again, tens of thousands of American troops are pouring
into Baghdad. Yesterday the Pentagon announced that battle-
weary Army units in Iraq would have to stay on for an
additional three months past their scheduled return dates.

Mr. Bush is desperately gambling that by stretching the
Army to the absolute limits of its deployable strength,
he may be able to impose some relative calm in the capital.
And he seems to imagine that should that gamble succeed,
the Shiite-dominated government of Prime Minister Nuri
Kamal al-Maliki will, without any serious pressure from
Washington, take the steps toward sharing political power
and economic resources it has tenaciously resisted since
the day it took office a year ago.

Unless Mr. Maliki takes those steps — eliminating militia
and death squad members from the Iraqi Army and police,
fairly sharing oil revenues, and rolling back laws that
deny political and economic opportunities to the Sunni
middle class — no lasting security gains are possible.
More Iraqi and American lives will be sacrificed.

Even among Shiites, who suffered so much at the hands
of Saddam Hussein and who are the supposed beneficiaries
of Mr. Maliki’s shortsighted policies, there is a deep
disillusionment and anger. This week, a Washington Post
reporter interviewed Khadim al-Jubouri, who four years
ago swung his sledgehammer to help knock down the
dictator’s statue. Mr. Jubouri said that ever since
he watched that statue being built he had nourished
a dream of bringing it down and ushering in much
better times.

Now, with friends and relatives killed, kidnapped
or driven from their homes, the prices of basic
necessities soaring and electricity rationed to
four hours a day, Mr. Jubouri says the change of
regimes “achieved nothing” and he has come to hate
the American military presence he once welcomed.

Mr. Maliki’s supporters can be even more frightening
to listen to. This week’s demonstration in Najaf
was organized by the fiercely anti-American Shiite
cleric Moktada al-Sadr, whose political party and
militia helped put Mr. Maliki in power and are
still among his most important allies.

Two months into the Baghdad security drive, the gains
Mr. Bush is banking on have not materialized. More
American soldiers continue to arrive, and their
commanders are talking about extending the troop
buildup through the fall or into early next year.
After four years, the political trend is even more
discouraging.

There is no possible triumph in Iraq and very
little hope left.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

6) Civilian Claims on U.S. Suggest the Toll of War
By PAUL von ZIELBAUER
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/world/middleeast/12abuse.html?hp

In February 2006, nervous American soldiers in Tikrit killed
an Iraqi fisherman on the Tigris River after he leaned over
to switch off his engine. A year earlier, a civilian filling
his car and an Iraqi Army officer directing traffic were shot
by American soldiers in a passing convoy in Balad, for no
apparent reason.

The incidents are among many thousands of claims submitted
to the Army by Iraqi and Afghan civilians seeking payment
for noncombat killings, injuries or property damage American
forces inflicted on them or their relatives.

The claims provide a rare window into the daily chaos and
violence faced by civilians and troops in the two war
zones. Recently, the Army disclosed roughly 500 claims
to the American Civil Liberties Union in response to
a Freedom of Information Act request. They are the
first to be made public.

They represent only a small fraction of the claims filed.
In all, the military has paid more than $32 million to
Iraqi and Afghan civilians for noncombat-related killings,
injuries and property damage, an Army spokeswoman said.
That figure does not include condolence payments made
at a unit commander’s discretion.

The paperwork, examined by The New York Times, provides
unusually detailed accounts of how bystanders to the
conflicts have become targets of American forces grappling
to identify who is friend, who is foe.

In the case of the fisherman in Tikrit, he and his
companion desperately tried to appear unthreatening
to an American helicopter overhead.

“They held up the fish in the air and shouted ‘Fish!
Fish!’ to show they meant no harm,” said the Army report
attached to the claim filed by the fisherman’s family.
The Army refused to compensate for the killing, ruling
that it was “combat activity,” but approved $3,500 for
his boat, net and cellphone, which drifted away and
were stolen.

In the killings at the gas station in Balad, documents
show that the Army determined that the neither of the
dead Iraqis had done anything hostile or criminal, and
approved $5,000 to the civilian’s brother but nothing
for the Iraqi officer.

In another incident, in 2005, an American soldier in
a dangerous Sunni Arab area south of Baghdad killed
a boy after mistaking his book bag for a bomb satchel.
The Army paid the boy’s uncle $500.

The Foreign Claims Act, which governs such compensation,
does not deal with combat-related cases. For those cases,
including the boy’s, the Army may offer a condolence
payment as a gesture of regret with no admission of fault,
of usually no higher than $2,500 per person killed.

The total number of claims filed, or paid, is unclear,
although extensive data has been provided in reports
to Congress. There is no way to know immediately whether
disciplinary action or prosecution has resulted from
the cases.

Soldiers hand out instruction cards after mistakes are
made, so Iraqis know where to file claims. “The Army
does not target civilians,” said Maj. Anne D. Edgecomb,
an Army spokeswoman. “Sadly, however, the enemy’s tactics
in Iraq and Afghanistan unnecessarily endanger innocent
civilians.”

There are no specific guidelines to tell Army field
officers judging the claims how to evaluate the cash
value of a life taken, Major Edgecomb said. She said
officers “consider the contributions the deceased made
to those left behind and offer an award based on the facts,
local tribal customs, and local law.”

In Haditha, one of the most notorious incidents involving
American troops in Iraq, the Marines paid residents
$38,000 after troops killed two dozen people
in November 2005.

The relatively small number of claims divulged by the
Army show patterns of misunderstanding at checkpoints
and around American military convoys that often result
in inadvertent killings. In one incident, in Feb. 18,
2006, a taxi approached a checkpoint east of Baquba
that was not properly marked with signs to slow down,
one Army claim evaluation said. Soldiers fired on the
taxi, killing a woman and severely wounding her daughter
and son. The Army approved an unusually large condolence
payment of $7,500.

In September 2005, soldiers killed a man and his sister
by firing 200 rounds into their car as it approached
a checkpoint, apparently too quickly, near Mussayib.
The Army lieutenant colonel who handled the claim
awarded relatives a $10,000 compensation payment,
finding that the soldiers had overstepped the rules
of engagement.

“There are some very tragic losses of civilian life,
including losses of whole families,” said Anthony D.
Romero, the A.C.L.U.’s executive director, in an interview.
He said the claims showed “enormous confusion on all sides,
both from the civilian population on how to interact with
the armed services and also among the soldiers themselves.”

Of the 500 cases released, 204, or about 40 percent, were
apparently rejected because the injury, death or property
damage was deemed to have been “directly or indirectly”
related to combat. Of the claims approved for payment,
at least 87 were not combat-related, and 77 were condolence
payments for incidents the Army judged to be combat-related.

About 10 percent of the claims were rejected because the
Army could not find a “significant activity” report
confirming an incident.

A summary of the cases is online at
www.aclu.org/civiliancasualties.

In Iraq, rules for evaluating claims have changed.
Before President Bush declared major combat operations
over, in May 2003, commanders considered most checkpoint
shootings to be combat-related. Lt. Gen. Peter W. Chiarelli,
the former commander of day-to-day operations in Iraq,
stiffened rules at checkpoints. In late 2003, as more
Iraqis were accidentally injured or killed, the Army
began offering condolence payments. It has not always
worked as planned, said Sarah Holewinski, the executive
director of the Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict,
a nonprofit group in Washington.

“Sometimes families would get paid and sometimes their
neighbors wouldn’t,” she said. “It caused a lot of
resentments among the Iraqis, which is ironic because
it was a program specifically meant to foster good will.”

The Army usually assigns a captain, major or lieutenant
colonel to accept claims in Iraq and Afghanistan and
decide on payment.

But in and near combat zones in Iraq, a claim’s merit
is quickly judged by an officer juggling dozens of new
claims each week, said Jon E. Tracy, a former Army captain
and lawyer who adjudicated Iraqi civilian claims in the
Baghdad area from May 2003 through July 2004.

“I know plenty of lawyers who did not pay any condolences
payments at all,” said Mr. Tracy, who is now a legal
consultant for the Campaign for Innocent Victims in
Conflict. “There was no reason for it. It was clearly
not combat, and the victim was clearly innocent, all
the facts are there, witness statements, but they
wouldn’t pay them.”

Half of the claims he adjudicated were property damage
claims from collisions with military vehicles, he said.
Most fraudulent claims were property claims; few were
for wrongful killings. “You just had to read people,”
he said.

About a quarter of claims were for personal injury
or deaths. In his year judging claims, Mr. Tracy said
he paid 52 condolence payments, most for deaths. “I had
three to four times more,” Mr. Tracy said, “I just didn’t
have enough money.”

Andrew W. Lehren contributed reporting from New York,
and Edward Wong from Baghdad.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

7) U.S. Suspects That Iran Aids Both Sunni and Shiite Militias
By ALISSA J. RUBIN
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/world/middleeast/12iraq.html?ref=world

BAGHDAD, April 11 — Arms that American military officials
say appear to have been manufactured in Iran as recently
as last year have turned up in the past week in a Sunni-
majority area, the chief spokesman for the American
military command in Iraq said Wednesday in a news
conference.

The spokesman, Maj. Gen. William B. Caldwell IV, said
that detainees in American custody had indicated that
Iranian intelligence operatives had given support to
Sunni insurgents and that surrogates for the Iranian
intelligence service were training Shiite extremists
in Iran. He gave no further description of the detainees
and did not say why they would have that information.

“We have in fact found some cases recently where Iranian
intelligence sources have provided to Sunni insurgent
groups some support,” said General Caldwell, who sat
near a table crowded with weapons that he said the
military contended were largely of Iranian manufacture.

The weapons were found in a mostly Sunni neighborhood
in Baghdad, he said, a rare instance of the American
military suggesting any link between Iran and the Sunni
insurgency. It has recently suggested a link with
Shiite militants in Iraq.

The accusation of a link between the Iranian intelligence
service and Sunni Arab insurgents is new. The American
military has contended in the past that elements in Iran
have given Shiite militants powerful Iranian-made roadside
bombs known as explosively formed penetrators, and training
in their use.

Critics have cast doubt on the American military statements
about those bombs, saying the evidence linking them to
Iran was circumstantial and inferential.

The weapons displayed on Wednesday were more conventional,
and officials pointed to markings on them that they said
indicated Iranian manufacture.

The display came as the military released figures showing
that 26 percent fewer civilians were killed and wounded
in Baghdad from Jan. 1 through March 31 than during the
previous quarter, as the new American effort to secure
Baghdad got under way, but that nationwide civilian
casualties had risen.

From February to March the number of dead and wounded
nationwide, including civilians and members of Iraqi
and American security forces, rose 10 percent, according
to the military report.

“What does that mean?” General Caldwell said. “It means
we still have a lot of work to do.”

The military announced that one soldier died on the
eastern side of Baghdad from a roadside bomb early
Wednesday and that another soldier died in southern
Baghdad on Tuesday.

In his statement, General Caldwell renewed American
contentions that Iran was not doing enough to stop
weapons from being moved into Iraq from outside.

It is unclear from the military’s comments on Wednesday
whether it is possible to draw conclusions about how
the weapons that the military contends are of Iranian
origin might have made their way into a predominantly
Sunni area or why Shiite Iran would arm Sunni militants.

There are several possibilities, military officials
who were not authorized to speak publicly for attribution
said privately. One is that they came through Syria,
long a transit route for Iranian-made weapons being
funneled to the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah.
Another possibility is that arms dealers are selling
to every side in the conflict.

The weapons on the table next to General Caldwell were
found two days ago, the general said, after a resident
of the predominantly Sunni Arab neighborhood called
Jihad, in western Baghdad, informed the local Joint
Security Station run by Iraqi and American soldiers
that there were illegal arms in the area.

The soldiers found a black Mercedes sedan and on its
back seat, in plain view, a rocket of a type commonly
made in China but repainted and labeled and sold by
Iran, said Maj. Marty Weber, a master ordnance
technician who joined General Caldwell at the
briefing. In the trunk were mortar rounds marked
“made in 2006.”

In a nearby house and buried in the yard, the soldiers
found more mortar rounds, 1,000 to 2,000 rounds of
bullets, five hand grenades and a couple of Bulgarian-
made rocket-propelled grenades, Major Weber said.

The weapons that the military officials said were
of Iranian origin were labeled in English, which
Major Weber said was typical of arms manufactured
for international sale. He added that the military
knew that they were of Iranian origin by “the
structure of the rounds, the geometry of the
tailfins and, again, the stenciling on the warheads.”

He also said the mortar rounds marked 81 millimeters
on the table were made regionally only by Iran.

In the political arena, the members of Parliament
allied with the militant Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr
announced that they would leave the government unless
Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki set a fixed
timetable for the withdrawal of American troops
from Iraq. Mr. Maliki rejected the idea this week.

The capital was largely quiet on Wednesday, but 16
bodies were found around the city and a director
general of the city’s electricity ministry was
assassinated, an Interior Ministry official said.
The center of the city, where fighting raged on Tuesday,
remained extremely tense.

The United States military raised the death toll
from Tuesday’s estimate to 14 insurgents in Fadhil
killed, 8 detained and 12 wounded.

Sheik Jasim Yehiya Jasim, the imam of Al Joba mosque,
whose brother was killed by the Iraqi Army, said he
was devastated and confused about why his brother had
been singled out and killed. “He was born only in 1982,”
Sheik Jasim said. “He did the call to prayer. I thank
the Iraqi and American governments in the name of the
people of Fadhil for this bloody democracy.”

Khalid al-Ansary contributed reporting.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

8) About Creation, Pope Melds Faith With Science
By IAN FISHER
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/world/europe/12pope.html

ROME, April 11 — Science cannot fully explain the mystery
of creation, Pope Benedict XVI said in comments about
evolution that were published in a book on Wednesday.
At the same time, he did not reject evolutionary theory
or endorse any alternative for the origins of life.

“I would not depend on faith alone to explain the whole
picture,” Benedict, a former theology professor, told
his former students in September at a private seminar
outside Rome on evolution, according to an account
of the book from Reuters.

As pope, Benedict has not publicly defined his position,
amid angry debates in the United States over “intelligent
design” and questions raised two years ago by a leading
cardinal on whether evolution was compatible with
Catholicism.

But his comments at the seminar, published in German
by students who were present, seemed largely to avoid
any such debate: Rather, they seemed consistent with
his often-stated views on other subjects — that science
and reason, however valuable, should not rule out God.

The debate over evolution, he said, concerned “the great
fundamental questions of philosophy: where man and the
world came from and where they are going.”

The book, called “Creation and Evolution,” was not
publicly available on Wednesday, and Reuters did not
say how it had obtained a copy.

Apart from the pope’s comments, the book includes
essays from Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, a former
student of the pope who set off much debate in 2005
after seeming to raise doubts about evolution.

As Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, before he became pope
two years ago, Benedict had expressed concern that
on several fronts, including evolution, science was
overstepping its competence, denying the existence
of God and becoming its own system of belief. Though
he did not reject evolution, he noted in the remarks
quoted from the book that science could not completely
prove evolution because it could not be duplicated
in the laboratory.

But, Reuters reported, he also defended what is known
as theistic evolution, the idea that God could use
evolutionary processes to create life, if not through
the direct engineering suggested by “intelligent design,”
which posits that life is so complex that it requires
an active creator.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

9) Life in Iraq Worsening, Red Cross Says
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/world/middleeast/12redcross.html

GENEVA, April 11 — The situation for civilians in Iraq is
“ever worsening,” though security in some places has improved
because of stepped-up efforts by the American-led multinational
forces, the International Red Cross said Wednesday.

Thousands of bodies lie unclaimed in mortuaries, with
relatives either unaware that they are there or afraid
to recover them, said Pierre Kraehenbuehl, director
of operations for the International Committee of the
Red Cross. Medical professionals have been fleeing the
country after the killings and abductions of colleagues,
the group said.

“Whatever operation that is today under way, and that
may be taken tomorrow and in the weeks after,
to improve the security of civilians on the ground
may have an effect in the medium term,”
Mr. Kraehenbuehl said.

“We’re certainly not seeing an immediate effect
in terms of stabilization for civilians currently.
That is not our reading.”

Referring to southern Iraq, he said, “It is clear that
the security situation has improved in certain instances.”
But the central region, including Baghdad, remains greatly
troubled, despite new security efforts, he added.

The Red Cross has reduced operations in Iraq since
attacks on its staff and Baghdad headquarters in 2003.
It relies on an affiliate for much of its information.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

10) 4 Years On, the Gap Between Iraq Policy
and Practice Is Wide
By DAVID E. SANGER
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/world/middleeast/12policy.html

WASHINGTON, April 11 — Four years after the fall of Baghdad,
the White House is once again struggling to solve an old
problem: Who is in charge of carrying out policy in Iraq?

Once again President Bush and his top aides are searching
for a high-level coordinator capable of cutting through
military, political and reconstruction strategies that
have never operated in sync, in Washington or in Baghdad.

Once again Mr. Bush is publicly declaring that his
administration has settled on a strategy for victory —
this time, a troop increase that is supposed to open
political space for Sunnis and Shiites to live and
govern together — even while his top aides acknowledge
that the White House has never gotten the execution right.

“We’re trying to learn from our experience,” Stephen
J. Hadley, the national security adviser, said in an
interview on Wednesday. Confirming a report that first
appeared in The Washington Post, Mr. Hadley said he
had been sounding out retired military commanders
to assess their interest in a job where they would
report directly to President Bush.

“One of the things that we’ve heard from Republicans
and Democrats is that we need to go a step further
in Washington and have a single point of focus,
someone who can work 24/7 on the Washington end
of executing the strategy we’ve put in place for
the next 22 months,” to the end of Mr. Bush’s term.

Mr. Hadley came to his job in the beginning of 2005,
after four years as deputy national security adviser,
and said from the outset that the Achilles’ heel
of the administration had been its failure to execute
its policies.

Now, Mr. Hadley said, he had decided that “while we’ve
had plans and due dates and stoplight charts, what we
need is someone with a lot of stature within the
government who can make things happen.” That official,
Mr. Hadley said, would deal daily with the new American
ambassador in Iraq, Ryan C. Crocker, and the new commander,
Gen. David H. Petraeus, and then “call any cabinet
secretary and get problems resolved, fast.”

Mr. Hadley says he has not yet brought top candidates
into the White House for formal interviews. But what
he is seeking is someone willing to take on, at the
end of a war-weary administration, one of the most
thankless jobs in Washington: overseeing policy in
Iraq and Afghanistan, where the administration has
discovered that changing regimes was a lot easier
than changing habits.

It is telling that Mr. Hadley and Mr. Bush are still
wrestling with this problem. Four years ago, both had
hoped and expected that by 2007, Iraq would essentially
be a cleanup operation, involving a comparatively small
American force. Instead, the current force of 145,000
is building to 160,000.

For both men, deciding who in Washington should take
the reins on Iraq strategy is hardly a new task.

It was in August 2003, five months after the American
invasion, that Mr. Bush ordered the formation of an
Iraq Stabilization Group to run things from the White
House. That action reflected the first recognition
by the White House that Donald H. Rumsfeld’s Pentagon
was more interested in deposing dictators than
nation-building.

When that group was formed, Mr. Rumsfeld snapped that
it was about time that the National Security Council
performed its traditional job — unifying the actions
of a government whose agencies often spent much
of their day battling one another. That approach
worked, for a while.

But then the insurgency in Iraq grew formidable,
reconstruction efforts were slowed, the State and
Defense Departments reverted to bureaucratic spats,
and the White House never managed to get its arms
around the scope of the problem, in Baghdad or in
Washington.

That was evident earlier this year when Secretary
of State Condoleezza Rice and the new defense
secretary, Robert M. Gates, openly clashed on the
question of who would provide the personnel for
new Provincial Reconstruction Teams that were
charged with trying, once again, to rebuild Iraq.

But that was only a small part of the problem: When
the Iraq Study Group turned out its recommendations
in December for revamping strategy, it cited “a lack
of coordination by senior management in Washington,”
declaring that “focus, priority setting, and skillful
implementation are in short supply.”

Mr. Hadley’s initiative won support on Wednesday from
Mr. Gates, who has spent much of the past four months
demonstrating that he is the anti-Rumsfeld.

At a news conference, Mr. Gates offered a public
endorsement for the idea of empowering someone at
the White House to better carry out the president’s
priorities. “This person is not ‘running the war,’ ”
Mr. Gates said. “This ‘czar’ term is, I think,
kind of silly.”

Instead, he said, “this is what Steve Hadley would
do if Steve Hadley had the time, but he doesn’t have
the time to do it full time.”

Part of the new job is to make sure, in Mr. Gates’s
words, that when Ambassador Crocker or General Petraeus
“have requested something from the government and not
gotten it, or it’s moving too slowly through the
bureaucracy, that there is somebody empowered by the
president to call a cabinet secretary and say, ‘The
president would like to know why you haven’t delivered
what’s been asked for yet.’ ”

As David J. Rothkopf, who wrote a history of the
National Security Council titled “Running the World”
(Public Affairs, 2005), noted Wednesday, “It’s been
a difficult thing for the N.S.C. to do because it is
an almost impossible task.”

“This is a problem of Sunnis and Shiites, and it is
not about Republicans and Democrats or the rank of
officials or bureaucratic rivalry,” he said. “The
Sunnis started fighting the Shiites a thousand years
before we got to Plymouth Rock, and it’s hard to create
a new special implementer to deal with that.”

But by this point in the Bush administration, officials
say, their only hope is to take the surge and run with
it. So when Meghan L. O’Sullivan, a deputy national
security adviser for Iraq and Afghanistan, told Mr.
Hadley a few months ago that she was ready to leave,
the White House seized the moment to open a post nearly
equivalent in power to Mr. Hadley’s own job.

For a White House that invaded Iraq with hopes that
it would become a model for the Middle East, this seems
to be another step away from ideological missions and
toward the nuts and bolts of rescuing its troubled
nation-building experiment.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

11) Panel on Walter Reed Woes Issues Strong Rebuke
By SCOTT SHANE
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12medical.html?ref=us

WASHINGTON, April 11 — An independent panel assessing
dilapidated facilities and red tape for wounded Iraq
war veterans at Walter Reed Army Medical Center on
Wednesday issued a sweeping indictment of leadership
failures, inadequate training and staffing shortages.

The panel, headed by two former secretaries of the Army,
Togo D. West Jr. and John O. Marsh Jr., found that a high
standard of care for troops when they were first evacuated
from war zones and hospitalized fell apart when they became
outpatients, with a “breakdown in health services” and
“compassion fatigue” on the part of overworked staff
members.

“Leadership at Walter Reed should have been aware
of poor living conditions and administrative hurdles
and failed to place proper priority on solutions,”
the panel said in a summary of its draft report
released at a meeting at Walter Reed.

The report called the current system for assessing
soldiers’ disabilities “extremely cumbersome,
inconsistent, and confusing,” saying it must be
“completely overhauled.” It called for the creation
of a “center of excellence” on treatment, training
and research on two conditions suffered by thousands
of troops in Iraq: traumatic brain injury and post-
traumatic stress disorder.

The panel, called the Independent Review Group,
was appointed by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates
in February after The Washington Post reported on
the problems at Walter Reed, the Army’s century-old
medical center in Washington. A presidential commission
and a Department of Veterans Affairs task force are
also assessing the troubles.

The conditions at Walter Reed, including moldy, rat-
infested quarters and a bureaucratic maze that left
severely injured soldiers in limbo for months, have
become a symbol of the government’s broader failure
to help troops injured in Iraq and Afghanistan. President
Bush visited patients at the facility March 30 and said,
“I apologize for what they went through, and we’re going
to fix the problem.”

A spokeswoman for Mr. Gates, Cynthia O. Smith, said
Wednesday that he “welcomes the findings and believes
our wounded warriors deserve the best treatment possible
both as inpatients and outpatients.”

The initial reports in February led to a shake-up of Army
leadership. Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey fired Walter
Reed’s commander, Maj. Gen. George Weightman, and replaced
him with Lt. Gen. Kevin Kiley, the Army surgeon general.

But critics said General Kiley had been told about the
problems and failed to act. Mr. Gates then publicly
criticized the Army’s response as inadequate, and both
Mr. Harvey and General Kiley stepped down.

Since then, the Army has moved aggressively to make
improvements at Walter Reed. Patients have been moved
out of the most squalid building. Some 28 new case
managers have been added to help wounded soldiers
navigate the medical system. A telephone hot line
has been opened and information handbooks have been
distributed to families of wounded service members.

In remarks at Wednesday’s meeting, Mr. West, a former
military lawyer who served as both secretary of the
Army and secretary of veterans affairs under President
Bill Clinton, strongly criticized the tortuous bureaucracy
that assesses soldiers’ disabilities.

“The horrors inflicted on our wounded service members
and their families in the name of the physical disability
review process simply must be stopped,” Mr. West said.

He said the Army’s system currently requires four
proceedings before an official board, causing delays
and excessive paperwork and producing “inexplicable
differences in standards and results.”

“We can and must do better,” he said.

Mr. West also said the panel concluded there was
inadequate understanding of how to diagnose and treat
the brain injuries that have become a signature
of the Iraq war, where thousands of troops have
been wounded by improvised explosive devices,
and the mental effects of long exposure to the
constant threat of attack.

“We believe there is a need for greater and better
coordinated research in this area,” he said.

Under legislation introduced Wednesday by Senators
Evan Bayh of Indiana and Hillary Rodham Clinton
of New York, both Democrats, troops suffering from
traumatic brain injuries would be kept on active
duty, rather than being retired, so they would
receive more medical attention.

Steve Robinson, a longtime veterans’ advocate with
Veterans for America, said he welcomed the findings
of the review panel. But he said the panel should
address the problems of discharged soldiers who
were not getting V.A. benefits they needed.

“What are we going to do about the thousands of
people who have unjustifiably lost their V.A. benefits
forever?” Mr. Robinson said. “It’s not enough just
to fix the problems starting from the point that
President Bush went to Walter Reed.”

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

12) As His Time Grows Short, a Dog Seeks a Reprieve
By PAUL VITELLO
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/nyregion/12dog.html

BAY SHORE, N.Y., April 11 — In legal papers filed on
Wednesday in the Appellate Division of State Supreme
Court, the conflicting portraits of the prisoner seem
to describe two different individuals.

He is a vicious predator with a history of assault.
Or, he is the kind who would not even show his teeth
if you pulled his ears.

After three and a half years on doggie death row,
Duke, a 5-year-old American pit bull terrier, is the
subject of an unusual, last-ditch appeal of a judge’s
“order of destruction” over his attacks on a neighbor
dog twice in two months in 2003. His lawyer contends
that Duke was wrongly convicted and harshly sentenced,
based on a law that took effect on Jan. 1, 2004, two
weeks after the attack, making dog-on-dog attacks
subject to serious punishment. Before that, only
dogs attacking humans were punished severely.

“We are running out of options,” said the lawyer,
Amy Chaitoff. “And it would be a terrible injustice.”

Duke’s case has drawn considerable attention on Long
Island. Dog rescue organizations staged a demonstration
at Islip Town Hall in 2005, demanding that he be freed.
And during a 2006 hearing, a crowd of about 60 gathered
outside the courthouse to show solidarity with Duke’s
owners, Denise and Chanse Menendez of Hauppauge.

But if the judges of the state Appellate Division in
Brooklyn rule against him this time, Duke, who has
been confined to the last cage on the east tier of Kennel
No. 1 at the Town of Islip Animal Shelter here since
Dec. 26, 2003, will probably soon eat his last biscuit.
(His cage is adjacent to the small room where workers
administer lethal injections to a dozen or so animals
each week.)

In some ways, legal experts say, Duke represents a new
class of death-row dog. New York is among a dozen states
that have changed laws over the past 10 years to make
it possible to seize dogs from their owners and order
them euthanized for biting other dogs.

Ledy VanKavage, director of legislation for the American
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, said
the stricter provisions reflected several factors: the
rising numbers of pet dogs in American households,
a growing concern about highly publicized vicious
dog cases, and what she called the “evolving human-
animal bond.”

“The thinking goes: ‘My dog is a member of my family.
If you attack my dog, you are attacking my family,’ ”
she said.

But Ms. VanKavage said this was flawed logic, noting,
“Dogs are predators, after all.”

The opposing view is in the papers filed on behalf
of Duke’s former neighbor, Dominick Motta, who
testified that on Oct. 23, 2003, Duke and his pit
bull sister, Shelby, chased Mr. Motta’s bulldog,
Daisy, and that Duke bit her.

After a hearing, Duke was designated a “dangerous
dog” by District Court Judge Madeleine A. Fitzgibbon
of Suffolk County. His owners were ordered to keep
him indoors or in a specially built kennel outdoors.

When Duke got loose on Dec. 13, 2003, and again
chased and bit Daisy, Mr. Motta, who then had three
children ages 2 to 7, filed a follow-up complaint,
which resulted in Judge Fitzgibbon’s order of
destruction.

“My client did not order the dog euthanized,
a judge did,” Mr. Motta’s lawyer, John L. Belford Jr.
of St. James, said in an interview. “And the judge’s
decision was not designed to protect my client alone.”

If Duke shares with some human death row residents
the kind of mysterious personality that can look
darkly dangerous to some and intriguing to others,
he also shares what seems like the equanimity of
one who is at peace with himself.

“Watch this, I’m going to do some things that no
aggressive dog would tolerate,” said Jeff Kolbjornsen,
an animal behaviorist who attended the rallies on Duke’s
behalf, on a visit to the shelter the other day.

He clamped a hand over the dog’s mouth. He pushed him.
He stepped on his paw, lightly. He gently slapped
the dog’s head.

Duke — whose skull is about the size of a baby watermelon,
whose neck is roughly as thick as a man’s thigh, and whose
mouth is ear to ear — sat on his hind legs, panting,
his tongue extended just past the widest part of his
wide chest. He nudged and then licked Mr. Kolbjornsen’s
hand.

“This is the nicest, calmest dog I have ever worked with,
and I’ve been here seven years,” said Joanne Daly,
an attendant at the shelter.

In the brief filed with the court on Wednesday by
Ms. Chaitoff, the lawyer for Duke’s owners, affidavits
from Ms. Daly and from Matt Caracciolo, the shelter
supervisor, were included praising the dog’s unflappable
and friendly nature.

But the main thrust of her argument is that the law under
which he was prosecuted, Section 108 of the state’s
Agriculture and Markets Law, which defines “a dangerous
dog,” changed from the time of the attacks to the time
of his trial.

In 2003, the law defined a dangerous dog as one who
attacks a person or attacks certain types of service
animals, like Seeing Eye dogs. It was in 2004 that
the law was expanded to include “companion animals,”
pets like Mr. Motta’s Daisy.

Therefore, Ms. Chaitoff said, in the eyes of the law,
as well as his friends, “Duke is an innocent dog.”

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

13) The Blinded Leading the Blind
A Jones for Justice
Connecting the Dots: Law, Slavery, and Immigration
By Dr. John Calvin Jones, PhD, JD
BC Columnist
www.blackcommentator.com/225/225_jones_for_justice_law_slavery_immigration_pf.html

I used to teach courses in government and politics
at a small college at South College in South Texas
(and I mean south – 260 miles south of San Antonio).
Though there was to be some sort of check on the
competence and baseline knowledge of the faculty,
i.e. that they knew something about the subject matter
in the courses that they taught, I quickly learned that
my colleagues in the department of government were,
to put it nicely, limited. While two others even knew
of Michael Parenti's Democracy for the Few, most had
never heard of an organization called the Project for
a New American Century (whose members include Dick
Cheney, Jeb Bush, Scooter Libby, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul
Wolfowitz, Philip Zelikow, and Zalmay Khalilzad),
no one else recognized the ubiquity and debilitating
effects of depleted uranium, and all but one other
thought that the 13th Amendment outlawed slavery
in the United States. The last point was particularly
troubling because my colleagues told all their students
that the 13 Amendment outlawed slavery in the United
States and demanded that the students repeat the lie.

Trained Ignorance

The collective wisdom of the school's administration
and my colleagues had determined that the best way
to determine if we instructors were dispensing relevant
information (much less teaching) anything apropos,
was to employ a uniform set of test questions that
we would give to the students taking intro classes
in government. Such was to work as a type of validity
test whereby each instructor would collect data and
report how many students got the "right" answer to
various trivia questions in the subject of American
and Texas government and politics.

Though I protested the entire project in theory, the
use of a uniform or department-wide test via a set
of multiple choice test questions is the logical
extension of the silly, if not criminal, project of
standardized testing demanded through programs like
No Child Left Behind. Included in this list of
about 50 questions was "which amendment banned slavery
in the United States?" While the non-reading, so-called
instructors claimed that the "correct answer" to the
question was the 13th Amendment. (Note, I refer to
my former colleagues as "instructors." They were not
professors in that only one of them had earned a PhD
and apparently he did not like to read anymore than
the rest of them). As I had known for about 20 years,
after reading the Constitution without a filter
(i.e. ignorant, yet licensed teacher), that the 13th
Amendment did not outlaw slavery in the United States,
I told my esteemed colleagues that that they were
mistaken. I explained, by citing the text (a rare
practice I have learned), that the Amendment did not
outlaw slavery at all, instead, the addition codifies
when slavery is legal.

For those of you who care to read and (re)learn,
please note that the 13th Amendment reads as follows:

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude,
except as a punishment for crime whereof the party
shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within
the United States, or any place subject to their
jurisdiction. (Italics added).

To put it more simply, in the United States, slavery
and or involuntary servitude is legal, when compelled
as punishment for a crime.

Though I demonstrated this plain language to my fellow
legal scholars, and added the need to demonstrate to
our students both the political and legal ramifications
of the 13th Amendment and how such is relevant today,
I was met with criticism about my being too hard, and
trying to push esoteric knowledge or being too ideological.
While I did not and do not mind others being in disagreement
with me, the fact that these people are paid by the state
to preach a lie is criminal. More importantly, because
these elders are "teaching" youth, there are particular
negative social ramifications for such pedagogy. What
shall the victims of ignorance and mendacity, and nearly
all these young people are Mexican-American, do or think
when faced with a newspaper story of so-called immigrant
labor shortages and the use of prison labor (including
imprisoned immigrants) to harvest crops in Colorado?
Without a recognition that slavery is legal, has been
and is maintained throughout American history, how can
our children make sense of a small news story and see
that the larger picture that touches on immigration law,
labor rights, outsourcing, and racism?

Colorado Works Its Slaves

According to Nicholas Riccardi, because of state laws
and crack downs on Mexican and Latino migrant laborers
in Colorado, various farms there are facing a labor
shortage – crops will be lost unless harvested.[1] And
while economic theorists might see the resulting shortage
of exploitable labor as a good thing for youth and
underemployed Americans who might fill the void,
Agribusiness and prison officials in Colorado have
a better idea – prison labor.

Riccardi finds that the Colorado Department of Corrections
is launching a pilot program, contracting with more than
a dozen farms to provide inmates to pick melons, onions
and peppers. (Note the program is only new to Colorado,
chain gangs and forced slave labor in agriculture
is nothing new in America).

Though she and colleagues in the Colorado legislature
empowered local police to engage in Nazi-style stop and
"check for papers" harassment leading to the arrest
of thousands of migrants, now Colorado Legislator
Dorothy Butcher wants to force prisoners to pick peppers
for pennies "to make sure the agricultural industry
wouldn't go out of business."

Ironically, under the Colorado prison-crop picker plan,
farms will pay more for inmate labor than they pay for
undocumented migrants. According to Riccardi, the
prisoners will be paid [sic] (i.e. credited, apparently
Mr. Riccardi has never been in prison) with 60 cents
a day. And it is unlikely that individual prisoners
will refuse. Firstly, while the program will employ
perhaps as many as 700 prisoners, Colorado has over
22,000 prisoners with "agricultural experience".
Secondly and more importantly, prison overseers can
use a combination of punishments and inducements to
encourage their participation.

Where to begin? The federal government sells fewer
than 200 visas for farm laborers every year. Colorado
arrests undocumented immigrant laborers – who cannot
obtain necessary documents. Prisoners forced to work.
"Prisoners" are paid more than migrant farm workers.
Migrant field workers in Colorado earn less than
60 cents a day. The cost to hold someone in jail
or prison costs the taxpayers anywhere from $30-75
per day! The prospect of prison wardens harvesting
the labor of their inmates is akin to Wal-Mart managers
forcing "associates" to work off the clock or walk home.

All Politics are Local, National and International

Without any plan for his presidency, other than
enrichment of his friends, murder of millions, and
praying for Armageddon prior to November 2008, Bush
is now turning attention from Iraq and Iran to the
US-Mexican border. Once again, speaking with Bushisms
and contradictions, W. announced a need for guest-
worker programs all the while calling for security
to "fight terrorism".[2]

To quote Keith Olbermann, Bush's words are lies.
Rather than provide for the orderly and legal entry
of thousands who come here to work, Bush orders or
allows his deputies in the Nazi-like Department
of Homeland Security (Hitler called it the
Reichssicherheitshauptamt) to round up thousands
(including women and children).

These people who are denied legal admission to the
U.S., are arrested at work and their children nabbed
at school in the name of "a war on terror" or a policy
of "law and order" that is simply insane (part of
a White Supremacist megalomania), economically inefficient,
and horribly cruel. How long will it be until thousands
of detained immigrants are farmed out in slave-labor camps?
That is how the Nazis took care of their inferior
populations, isn't it?

This week, as he has done for the past months, a Texan-
Activist, Jay Johnson-Castro, will be walking to Austin
to protest the imprisonment of hundreds of immigrants
in a system of private prisons across the state. Bush
could order the release of these people … but instead,
corporate interests in the private prison industry and
the Christo-fascist wing of the Republic party demand
militarization of the border and mass incarceration.
The entire system is immoral, but legal – as international
treaties and international laws to the contrary have
no force inside the United States.
Millions of us are beginning to learn the truth about
this system of slave labor and the immigration traps.
How many of us need to act out to stop it?

Sources:
[1] Riccardi, Nicholas 2007. "Colorado to Use Inmates
to Fill Migrant Shortage", Los Angeles Times, 1 March.
Posted at Truth Out
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/030107F.shtml

[2] Daily News & Analysis. "Bush renews call for
comprehensive immigration reforms", Wednesday, April 11, 2007.
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1090197

BC Columnist Dr John Calvin Jones, PhD, JD has
a law degree and a PhD in Political Science. His
Website is virtualcitizens.com. Click here to
contact Dr. Jones. jcjones@virtualcitizens.com

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

14) REFLECTIONS OF PRESIDENT FIDEL CASTRO
"More than three billion people in the world condemned
to premature death from hunger and thirst."
March 28, 2007
Fidel Castro.
Translated by Granma International
[This email was sent as a service by Roland Sheppard.
My website is http://web.mac.com/rolandgarret . Read
my book, The View From The Painter's Ladder available
at Amazon.com]

"More than three billion people in the world condemned
to premature death from hunger and thirst."

THAT is not an exaggerated figure, but rather a cautious
one. I have meditated a lot on that in the wake of President
Bush’s meeting with U.S. automobile manufacturers.

The sinister idea of converting food into fuel was
definitively established as an economic line in U.S.
foreign policy last Monday, March 26.

A cable from the AP, the U.S. news agency that reaches
all corners of the world, states verbatim:

"WASHINGTON, March 26 (AP). President Bush touted the
benefits of ‘flexible fuel’ vehicles running on ethanol
and biodiesel on Monday, meeting with automakers
to boost support for his energy plans.

"Bush said a commitment by the leaders of the domestic
auto industry to double their production of flex-fuel
vehicles could help motorists shift away from gasoline
and reduce the nation's reliance on imported oil.

'"That's a major technological breakthrough for the
country,' Bush said after inspecting three alternative
vehicles. If the nation wants to reduce gasoline use,
he said “the consumer has got to be in a position to
make a rational choice.”

"The president urged Congress to 'move expeditiously'
on legislation the administration recently proposed
to require the use of 35 billion gallons of alternative
fuels by 2017 and seek higher fuel economy standards
for automobiles.

"Bush met with General Motors Corp. chairman and chief
executive Rick Wagoner, Ford Motor Co. chief executive
Alan Mulally and DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler Group
chief executive Tom LaSorda.

"They discussed support for flex-fuel vehicles, attempts
to develop ethanol from alternative sources like
switchgrass and wood chips and the administration's
proposal to reduce gas consumption by 20 percent
in 10 years.

"The discussions came amid rising gasoline prices.
The latest Lundberg Survey found the nationwide
average for gasoline has risen 6 cents per gallon
in the past two weeks to $2.61."

I believe that reducing and moreover recycling all
motors that run on electricity and fuel is an
elemental and urgent need for all humanity. The
tragedy does not lie in reducing those energy costs
but in the idea of converting food into fuel.

It is known very precisely today that one ton of
corn can only produce 413 liters of ethanol on
average, according to densities. That is equivalent
to 109 gallons.

The average price of corn in U.S. ports has risen
to $167 per ton. Thus, 320 million tons of corn
would be required to produce 35 billion gallons
of ethanol.

According to FAO figures, the U.S. corn harvest
rose to 280.2 million tons in the year 2005.

Although the president is talking of producing fuel
derived from grass or wood shavings, anyone can
understand that these are phrases totally lacking
in realism. Let’s be clear: 35 billion gallons
translates into 35 followed by nine zeros!

Afterwards will come beautiful examples of what
experienced and well-organized U.S. farmers can
achieve in terms of human productivity by hectare:
corn converted into ethanol; the chaff from that
corn converted into animal feed containing 26% protein;
cattle dung used as raw material for gas production.
Of course, this is after voluminous investments only
within the reach of the most powerful enterprises,
in which everything has to be moved on the basis
of electricity and fuel consumption. Apply that recipe
to the countries of the Third World and you will see
that people among the hungry masses of the Earth will
no longer eat corn. Or something worse: lend funding
to poor countries to produce corn ethanol based on
corn or any other food and not a single tree will
be left to defend humanity from climate change.

Other countries in the rich world are planning to
use not only corn but also wheat, sunflower seeds,
Rapeseed and other foods for fuel production. For the
Europeans, for example, it would become a business
to import all of the world’s soybeans with the aim
of reducing the fuel costs for their automobiles and
feeding their animals with the chaff from that legume,
particularly rich in all types of essential amino acids.

In Cuba, alcohol used to be produced as a byproduct
of the sugar industry after having made three extractions
of sugar from cane juice. Climate change is already
affecting our sugar production. Lengthy periods of drought
alternating with record rainfall, that barely make it
possible to produce sugar with an adequate yield during
the 100 days of our very moderate winter; hence, there
Is less sugar per ton of cane or less cane per hectare
due to prolonged drought in the months of planting and
cultivation.

I understand that in Venezuela they would be using
alcohol not for export but to improve the environmental
quality of their own fuel. For that reason, apart from
the excellent Brazilian technology for producing alcohol,
in Cuba the use of such a technology for the direct
production of alcohol from sugar cane juice is no more
than a dream or the whim of those carried away by that
idea. In our country, land handed over to the direct
production of alcohol could be much useful for food
production for the people and for environmental
protection.

All the countries of the world, rich and poor, without
any exception, could save millions and millions of
dollars in investment and fuel simply by changing
all the incandescent light bulbs for fluorescent
ones, an exercise that Cuba has carried out in all
homes throughout the country. That would provide
a breathing space to resist climate change without
killing the poor masses through hunger.

As can be observed, I am not using adjectives to
qualify the system and the lords of the earth.
That task can be excellently undertaken by news
experts and honest social, economic and political
scientists abounding in the world who are constantly
delving into to the present and future of our species.
A computer and the growing number of Internet networks
are sufficient for that.

Today, we are seeing for the first time a really
globalized economy and a dominant power in the
economic, political and military terrain that in no
way resembles that of Imperial Rome.

Some people will be asking themselves why I am talking
of hunger and thirst. My response to that: it is not
about the other side of the coin, but about several
sides of something else, like a die with six sides,
or a polyhedron with many more sides.

I refer in this case to an official news agency,
founded in 1945 and generally well-informed about
economic and social questions in the world: TELAM.
It said, and I quote:

" In just 18 years, close to 2 billion people will
be living in countries and regions where water will
be a distant memory. Two-thirds of the world’s
population could be living in places where that
scarcity produces social and economic tensions
of such a magnitude that it could lead nations
to wars for the precious 'blue gold.'

"Over the last 100 years, the use of water has
increased at a rate twice as fast as that of
population growth.

"According to statistics from the World Water
Council, it is estimated that by 2015, the number
of inhabitants affected by this grave situation
will rise by 3.5 billion people.

" The United Nations celebrated World Water Day
on March 23, and called to begin confronting, that
very day, the international scarcity of water,
under the coordination of the UN Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO), with the goal of highlighting
the increasing importance of water scarcity on
a global scale, and the need for greater integration
and cooperation that would make it possible to
guarantee sustained and efficient management
of water resources.

"Many regions on the planet are suffering from
severe water shortages, living with less than
500 cubic meters per person per year. The number
of regions suffering from chronic scarcity of
this vital element is increasingly growing.

"The principal consequences of water scarcity
are an insufficient amount of the precious liquid
for producing food, the impossibility of industrial,
urban and tourism development and health problems."

That was the TELEAM cable.

In this case I will refrain from mentioning other
important facts, like the melting ice in Greenland
and the Antarctic, damage to the ozone layer and
the growing volume of mercury in many species of
fish for common consumption.

There are other issues that could be addressed,
but with these lines I am just trying to comment
on President Bush's meeting with the principal
executives of U.S. automakers.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

LINKS AND VERY SHORT STORIES

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

The New Suburban Poverty
by EYAL PRESS
[from the April 23, 2007 issue]
http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20070423&s=press

Canadian Auto Workers occupy parts
plant in Scarborough, Ontario
By Julian Benson from Toronto
Thursday, 12 April 2007
http://www.marxist.com/canadian-auto-workers-occupation110407.htm

U.S. Is Extending Tours of Army
By DAVID S. CLOUD
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/world/middleeast/12military.html

Kurt Vonnegut, Counterculture’s Novelist, Dies
By DINITIA SMITH
April 12, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/books/12vonnegut.html?hp

Robert Fisk: Divide and rule - America's plan for Baghdad
"Revealed: a new counter-insurgency strategy to carve up
the city into sealed areas. The tactic failed in Vietnam.
So what chance does it have in Iraq?"
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/article2439530.ece

Published: 11 April 2007

Refugees Speak of Escape from Hell
Inter Press Service
Dahr Jamail
"DAMASCUS, Apr 11 (IPS) - Refugees from Iraq scattered
around Damascus describe hellish conditions in the country
they managed to leave behind."
April 11, 2007
http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/hard_news/archives/syria/000565.php#more

Manhattan: Leash-Free Dogs at Night in City Parks
By TIMOTHY WILLIAMS
The Parks and Recreation Department announced yesterday
that a policy of allowing dogs off leashes during overnight
hours will become effective next month. Beginning May 10,
owners with a license and proof of a current rabies
vaccination will be permitted to let their dogs roam
in designated areas of city parks from 9 p.m. to 9 a.m.
Under an unofficial policy, the department has for years
not given tickets to dog owners who let their pets run
free at night in parks.
April 11, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/11/nyregion/11mbrfs-dogs.html

How Trees Might Not Be Green in Carbon Offsetting Debate
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/10/443/

There is climate change censorship - and it's the
deniers who dish it out
"Global warming scientists are under intense pressure
to water down findings, and are then accused
of silencing their critics."
George Monbiot
Tuesday April 10, 2007
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2053521,00.html

American Tortured in Iraq Sues Rumsfeld
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040907J.shtml

And These Refugees Are Lucky
http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/hard_news/archives/syria/000561.php#more

Bush Renews Effort on Immigration Plan
By DAVID STOUT
April 9, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/washington/09cnd-prexy.html?hp

Ranchers and Army Are at Odds in Old West
By DAN FROSCH
"DENVER, April 6 — Mack Louden worries that his 30,000-acre
ranch sits in the cross hairs of the Army’s plans to expand
its Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site at Fort Carson, and he, along
with other Colorado ranchers, are increasingly upset
about the idea.
'Where we live, how we live, it’s all going to die a slow death
if the Army gets our land,' said Mr. Louden, a fourth-
generation rancher from Las Animas County, along the
southern edge of the state."
April 9, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/us/09hearing.html?ref=washington

Big Coal Invokes Reverse Nuremberg Defense
Massey Energy's CEO: Just Giving Orders, Not Carrying Them Out
By CORPORATE CRIME REPORTER
April 9, 2007
http://www.counterpunch.com/ccr04092007.html

The political situation in Venezuela – interview
with Yonie Moreno, member of the CMR in Venezuela
By Yonnie Moreno
Monday, 09 April 2007
www.handsoffvenezuela.org/political_situation_venezuela_moreno.htm

FOCUS | US Warplanes Attack Shiites as Civil War Rages in Iraq
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040807Z.shtml

FOCUS | Thousands in LA Demand Immigrant Rights
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040807Y.shtml

Pesticides Linked to Honeybee Population Decline
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_4279.cfm

Executive Pay: A Special Report
More Pieces. Still a Puzzle.
By ERIC DASH
April 8, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/business/yourmoney/08pay.html?ref=business

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND INFORMATION
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

DEMAND THE RELEASE OF SAMI AL-ARIAN

The National Council of Arab Americans (NCA) demands the immediate
release of political prisoner, Dr. Sami Al-Arian. Although
Dr. Al-Arian is no longer on a hunger strike we must still demand
he be released by the US Department of Justice (DOJ). After an earlier
plea agreement that absolved Dr. Al-Arian from any further questioning,
he was sentenced up to 18 months in jail for refusing to testify before
a grand jury in Virginia. He has long sense served his time yet
Dr. Al-Arian is still being held. Release him now!

See:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/16/1410255

ACTION:

We ask all people of conscience to demand the immediate
release and end to Dr. Al- Arian's suffering.

Call, Email and Write:

1- Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Fax Number: (202) 307-6777
Email: AskDOJ@usdoj.gov

2- The Honorable John Conyers, Jr
2426 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-5126
(202) 225-0072 Fax
John.Conyers@mail.house.gov

3- Senator Patrick Leahy
433 Russell Senate Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
(202)224-4242
senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov

4- Honorable Judge Gerald Lee
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
401 Courthouse Square, Alexandria, VA 22314
March 22, 2007
[No email given...bw]

National Council of Arab Americans (NCA)
http://www.arab-american.net/

Criminalizing Solidarity: Sami Al-Arian and the War of
Terror
By Charlotte Kates, The Electronic Intifada, 4 April 2007
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article6767.shtml

Related:

Robert Fisk: The true story of free speech in America
This systematic censorship of Middle East reality
continues even in schools
Published: 07 April 2007
http://news. independent. co.uk/world/ fisk/article2430 125.ece

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

[For some levity...Hans Groiner plays Monk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51bsCRv6kI0
...bw]

Excerpt of interview between Barbara Walters and Hugo Chavez
http://www.borev.net/2007/03/what_you_had_something_better.html

Which country should we invade next?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3g_zqz3VjY

My Favorite Mutiny, The Coup
http://www.myspace.com/thecoupmusic

Michael Moore- The Awful Truth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeOaTpYl8mE

Morse v. Frederick Supreme Court arguments
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_LsGoDWC0o

Free Speech 4 Students Rally - Media Montage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfCjfod8yuw

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

'My son lived a worthwhile life'
In April 2003, 21-year old Tom Hurndall was shot in the head
in Gaza by an Israeli soldier as he tried to save the lives of three
small children. Nine months later, he died, having never
recovered consciousness. Emine Saner talks to his mother
Jocelyn about her grief, her fight to make the Israeli army
accountable for his death and the book she has written
in his memory.
Monday March 26, 2007
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,2042968,00.html

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Introducing...................the Apple iRack
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-KWYYIY4jQ

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

"A War Budget Leaves Every Child Behind."
[A T-shirt worn by some teachers at Roosevelt High School
in L.A. as part of their campaign to rid the school of military
recruiters and JROTC--see Article in Full item number 4, below...bw]

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

THIS IS AN EXCELLENT VIDEO DESTRIBUTED BY U.S. LABOR AGAINST
THE WAR (USLAW) FEATURING SPEAKERS AT THE JANUARY 27TH
MARCH ON WASHINGTON FOCUSING ON THE DEMAND - BRING
THE TROOPS HOME NOW.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6935451906479097836&hl=en

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Defend the Los Angeles Eight!
http://www.committee4justice.com/

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

George Takai responds to Tim Hardaway's homophobic remarks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcJoJZIcQW4&eurl_

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Iran
http://www.lucasgray.com/video/peacetrain.html

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Another view of the war. A link from Amer Jubran
http://d3130.servadmin.com/~leeflash/

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Petition: Halt the Blue Angels
http://action.globalexchange.org/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=458
http://www.care2.com/c2c/share/detail/289327

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

A Girl Like Me
7:08 min
Youth Documentary
Kiri Davis, Director, Reel Works Teen Filmmaking, Producer
Winner of the Diversity Award
Sponsored by Third Millennium Foundation
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1091431409617440489

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Film/Song about Angola
http://www.prisonactivist.org/angola/

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

"200 million children in the world sleep in the streets today.
Not one of them is Cuban."
(A sign in Havana)
Venceremos
View sign at bottom of page at:
http://www.cubasolidarity.net/index.html
[Thanks to Norma Harrison for sending this...bw]

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

"Cheyenne and Arapaho oral histories hammer history's account of the
Sand Creek Massacre"

CENTENNIAL, CO -- A new documentary film based on an award-winning
documentary short film, "The Sand Creek Massacre", and driven by
Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho people who tell their version about
what happened during the Sand Creek Massacre via their oral
histories, has been released by Olympus Films+, LLC, a Centennial,
Colorado film company.

"You have done an extraordinary job" said Margie Small, Tobient
Entertainment, " on the Colorado PBS episode, the library videos for
public schools and libraries, the trailer, etc...and getting the
story told and giving honor to those ancestors who had to witness
this tragic and brutal attack...film is one of the best ways."

"The images shown in the film were selected for native awareness
value" said Donald L. Vasicek, award-winning writer/filmmaker, "we
also focused on preserving American history on film because tribal
elders are dying and taking their oral histories with them. The film
shows a non-violent solution to problem-solving and 19th century
Colorado history, so it's multi-dimensional in that sense. "

Chief Eugene Blackbear, Sr., Cheyenne, who starred as Chief Black
Kettle in "The Last of the Dogmen" also starring Tom Berenger and
Barbara Hershey and "Dr. Colorado", Tom Noel, University of Colorado
history professor, are featured.

The trailer can be viewed and the film can be ordered for $24.95 plus
$4.95 for shipping and handling at http://www.fullduck.com/node/53.

Vasicek's web site, http://www.donvasicek.com, provides detailed
information about the Sand Creek Massacre including various still
images particularly on the Sand Creek Massacre home page and on the
proposal page.

Olympus Films+, LLC is dedicated to writing and producing quality
products that serve to educate others about the human condition.

Contact:

Donald L. Vasicek
Olympus Films+, LLC
7078 South Fairfax Street
Centennial, CO 80122
http://us.imdb.com/Name?Vasicek,+Don
http://www.donvasicek.com
dvasicek@earthlink.net
303-903-2103

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

A NEW LOOK AT U.S. RADIOACTIVE WEAPONS
Join us in a campaign to expose and stop the use
of these illegal weapons
http://poisondust.org/

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

You may enjoy watching these.
In struggle
Che:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqcezl9dD2c
Leon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukkFVV5X0p4

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

FIGHTBACK! A Collection of Socialist Essays
By Sylvia Weinstein
http://www.walterlippmann.com/sylvia-weinstein-fightback-intro.html

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

[The Scab
"After God had finished the rattlesnake, the toad,
and the vampire, he had some awful substance left with
which he made a scab."
"A scab is a two-legged animal with a corkscrew soul,
a water brain, a combination backbone of jelly and glue.
Where others have hearts, he carries a tumor of rotten
principles." "When a scab comes down the street,
men turn their backs and angels weep in heaven, and
the devil shuts the gates of hell to keep him out."
"No man (or woman) has a right to scab so long as there
is a pool of water to drown his carcass in,
or a rope long enough to hang his body with.
Judas was a gentleman compared with a scab.
For betraying his master, he had character enough
to hang himself." A scab has not.
"Esau sold his birthright for a mess of pottage.
Judas sold his Savior for thirty pieces of silver.
Benedict Arnold sold his country for a promise of
a commision in the british army."
The scab sells his birthright, country, his wife,
his children and his fellowmen for an unfulfilled
promise from his employer.
Esau was a traitor to himself; Judas was a traitor
to his God; Benedict Arnold was a traitor to his country;
a scab is a traitor to his God, his country,
his family and his class."
Author --- Jack London (1876-1916)...Roland Sheppard
http://web.mac.com/rolandgarret]

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

END ALL U.S. AID TO ISRAEL!
Stop funding Israel's war against Palestine
Complete the form at the website listed below with your information.
https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Advocacy?
JServSessionIdr003=cga2p2o6x1.app2a&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=177

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Sand Creek Massacre
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FEATURED AT NATIVE AMERICAN FILM FESTIVAL:
http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/local/16035305.htm
(scroll down when you get there])
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING
WRITER/FILMMAKER DONALD L. VASICEK REPORT:
http://www.digitalcinemareport.com/sandcreekmassacre.html
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FINALIST IN DOCUMENTARY CHANNEL COMPETITION (VIEW HERE):
http://www.docupyx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=28&Itemid=41
VIEW "THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FILM MOVIE OF THE WEEK FOR FREE HERE:
http://twymancreative.com/twymanc.html

On November 29, 1864, 700 Colorado troops savagely slaughtered
over 450 Cheyenne children, disabled, elders, and women in the
southeastern Colorado Territory under its protection. This act
became known as the Sand Creek Massacre. This film project
("The Sand Creek Massacre" documentary film project) is an
examination of an open wound in the souls of the Cheyenne
people as told from their perspective. This project chronicles
that horrific 19th century event and its affect on the 21st century
struggle for respectful coexistence between white and native
plains cultures in the United States of America.

Listed below are links on which you can click to get the latest news,
products, and view, free, "THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" award-
winning documentary short. In order to create more native
awareness, particularly to save the roots of America's history,
please read the following:

Some people in America are trying to save the world. Bless
them. In the meantime, the roots of America are dying.
What happens to a plant when the roots die? The plant dies
according to my biology teacher in high school. American's
roots are its native people. Many of America's native people
are dying from drug and alcohol abuse, poverty, hunger,
and disease, which was introduced to them by the Caucasian
male. Tribal elders are dying. When they die, their oral
histories go with them. Our native's oral histories are the
essence of the roots of America, what took place before
our ancestors came over to America, what is taking place,
and what will be taking place. It is time we replenish
America's roots with native awareness, else America
continues its decaying, and ultimately, its death.

You can help. The 22-MINUTE SAND CREEK MASSACRE
DOCUMENTARY PRESENTATION/EDUCATIONAL DVD IS
READY FOR PURCHASE! (pass the word about this powerful
educational tool to friends, family, schools, parents, teachers,
and other related people and organizations to contact
me (dvasicek@earthlink.net, 303-903-2103) for information
about how they can purchase the DVD and have me come
to their children's school to show the film and to interact
in a questions and answers discussion about the Sand
Creek Massacre.

Happy Holidays!

Donald L. Vasicek
Olympus Films+, LLC
http://us.imdb.com/Name?Vasicek,+Don
http://www.donvasicek.com
dvasicek@earthlink.net
303-903-2103

"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FEATURED AT NATIVE AMERICAN FILM FESTIVAL:
http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/local/16035305.htm
(scroll down when you get there])
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING
WRITER/FILMMAKER DONALD L. VASICEK REPORT:
http://www.digitalcinemareport.com/sandcreekmassacre.html
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FINALIST IN DOCUMENTARY CHANNEL COMPETITION (VIEW HERE):
http://www.docupyx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=28&Itemid=41
VIEW "THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FILM MOVIE OF THE WEEK FOR FREE HERE:
http://twymancreative.com/twymanc.html

SHOP:
http://www.manataka.org/page633.html
BuyIndies.com
donvasicek.com.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Tell Bush and Congress:
Don't Release Luis Posada Carriles!
Extradite Posada to Venezuela
https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Advocacy?JServSessionIdr006=238mdc75w3.app8a&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=159

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
ARTICLES IN FULL:
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

1) All That You Can Be
Risk Management
by Lauren Collins
April 9, 2007
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2007/04/09/070409ta_talk_collins

2) No hope in Guantánamo
BY JOSHUA COLANGELO-BRYAN
MIAMI HERALD
Apr. 05, 2007
http://www.miamiherald.com/851/v-print/story/64032.html

3) WE'VE BEEN SURGING FOR YEARS
By Don Monkerud
TomPaine.com
April 6, 2007
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2007/04/06/weve_been_surging_for_years.php

4) Permanent drought predicted for Southwest
"Study says global warming threatens to create a
Dust Bowl-like period. Water politics could
also get heated."
By Alan Zarembo and Bettina Boxall
Times Staff Writers
April 6, 2007
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-swdrought6apr06,0,122112.story?coll=la-home-headlines

5) Democrats at War
WALL STREET JOURNAL
EDITORIAL
April 6, 2007; Page A10
[Via Email from: Walter Lippmann
walterlx@earthlink.net ...bw]

6) Ford Pays Chief $28 Million for 4 Months’ Work
By NICK BUNKLEY
April 6, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/06/business/06ford.html?ref=businessspecial

7) Comcast Chief Executive Receives $26 Million
By GERALDINE FABRIKANT
March 30, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/30/business/businessspecial/30comcast.pay.html?ex=1176091200&en=a355f91bce1d207c&ei=5070

8) No Bonuses for Top G.M. Executives
By NICK BUNKLEY
March 29, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/29/business/businessspecial/29gmpay.html?ex=1176091200&en=b3bcb33a8bceaa23&ei=5070

9) Cuban jet bombing suspect ordered free on bail in U.S.
"Venezuela and Cuba want Luis Posada Carriles in a 1976 plane bombing
that killed 73. But in this country, the former CIA operative
is charged with lying to immigration officials."
By Carol J. Williams
Times Staff Writer
April 7, 2007
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-posada7apr07,1,7020766.story?coll=la-news-a_section

10) City asks court to quit Abu-Jamal case
By MARYCLAIRE DALE, Associated Press Writer1
April 6, 2007
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070406/ap_on_re_us/mumia_abu_jamal

11) Hot and Cold
Editorial
April 8,2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/opinion/08sun1.html?hp

12) Doctor’s Index Predicts Fate for Migrants in the Desert
"...more than 100 adult male
immigrants had died of heatstroke annually in Pima
County."
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
April 8, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/us/08immig.html

13) Trail of Tears
By ELIZABETH ROYTE
(RE: THE LONG EXILE
A Tale of Inuit Betrayal and Survival in the High Arctic.
By Melanie McGrath.
268 pp. Alfred A. Knopf. $24.95.)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/books/review/Royte.t.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1176050987-kCJ3ZpwQ2uOi7Yadi5MjcA

14) Sociable Darwinism
By NATALIE ANGIER
April 8, 2007
(RE:EVOLUTION FOR EVERYONE
How Darwin’s Theory Can Change the
Way We Think About Our Lives.
By David Sloan Wilson.
390 pp. Delacorte Press. $24.)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/books/review/Angier.t.html?ref=review

15) Sweet Little Lies
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Op-Ed Columnist
April 9, 2007
http://select.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/opinion/09krugman.html?hp

16) 6-Year-Olds Under Arrest
By BOB HERBERT
Op-Ed Columnist
Avon Park, Fla.
April 9, 2007
http://select.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/opinion/09herbert.html?hp

17) Guantánamo Detainees Stage Hunger Strike
By TIM GOLDEN
April 9, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/us/09hunger.html

18) Army Is Cracking Down on Deserters
By PAUL von ZIELBAUER
April 9, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/us/09awol.html?ref=us

19) CLOSE CONTACT
To Woo Afghan Locals,
U.S. Troops Settle In
Tactic Wins Friends,
Isolates Insurgents,
But Boosts Casualties
By MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS
April 9, 2007; Page A1
WALL STREET JOURNAL
[VIA Email from: Walter Lippmann
walterlx@earthlink.net ...bw]

20) Crop Prices Soar,
Pushing Up Cost
Of Food Globally
New Demand for Biofuels
Feeds Inflation Pressure;
China, India Feel Pinch
By PATRICK BARTA
April 9, 2007; Page A1
The Wall Street Journal
[VIA Email from: Walter Lippmann
walterlx@earthlink.net ...bw]

21) Injured troops shipped back into battle
"Salon has uncovered further evidence that the military sent soldiers
with acute post-traumatic stress disorder, severe back injuries and
other serious war wounds back to Iraq."
By Mark Benjamin
April 9, 2007
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/04/09/injured_soldiers/print.html

22) Huge Protest in Iraq Demands U.S. Withdraw
By EDWARD WONG
April 10, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/world/middleeast/10iraq.html?ref=world

23) High Stakes: Chávez Plays the Oil Card
“Chávez poses a much bigger threat to America’s energy
security than Saddam Hussein ever did.”
By SIMON ROMERO and CLIFFORD KRAUSS
April 10, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/business/worldbusiness/10showdown.html

24) General Wants Increased Troops Into Fall
By THE NEW YORK TIMES
April 10, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/world/middleeast/10troops.html

25) U.S. Raid on an Immigrant Household
Deepens Anger and Mistrust
By NINA BERNSTEIN
April 10, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/nyregion/10suffolk.html?ref=nyregion

26) In East Harlem School Closing, Talk of a Class Divide
By DAVID GONZALEZ
April 10, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/nyregion/10citywide.html?ref=nyregion

27) Reflections by the Commander in Chief
A BRUTAL REPLY
Fidel Castro Ruz
April 10, 2007
http://www.cuba.cu/gobierno/discursos/2007/ing/f100407i.html

28) Now the South Erupts
Inter Press Service
Ali al-Fadhily*
http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/hard_news/archives/iraq/000564.php#more

29) Cuban Youth Searching for Their Inner Selves
Juventud Rebelde reveals the finding of its Third National Survey of Youth
2007-04-10 | 13:31:23 EST
http://www.juventudrebelde.co.cu/cuba/2007-04-10/cuban-youth-searching-for-their-inner-selves-/

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

1) All That You Can Be
Risk Management
by Lauren Collins
April 9, 2007
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2007/04/09/070409ta_talk_collins

In the wake of a rise in substantiated instances
of misconduct by its recruiters, the United States
military, it was reported last month, is considering
installing surveillance cameras in its recruiting
stations. The military may also want to assess the
tactics that its employees use in the virtual realm.
This admissions season, an Army recruiter has been
e-mailing recent college graduates with the offer
of hundreds of thousands of dollars in scholarship
money to pay for medical school, in exchange for
four years of service. Nothing new there. What’s
surprising is his assertion to students that they
would be better off in Baghdad than in Georgetown.

Susan Kahane, who is twenty-two, graduated from
Columbia last spring. When she took the MCAT,
in August, she checked a box to signal that she
wished to receive information about outside sources
of financial aid. Soon, she was inundated with
e-mails from the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force
(“FREE MEDICAL SCHOOL!!!”). One, sent on January 31st
by Captain Christopher D. Mayhugh, of the Army
Medical Service Corps, stood out. “Upon finishing
your residency,” the message read, “you will be
assigned to one of a variety of locations including
Germany, Italy and Hawaii and your obligation will
be complete.” (The Medical Service Corps’s Web page,
in contrast, notes prominently that its officers
have participated in combat operations in Korea,
Kosovo, Somalia, Panama, and Iraq.)

Mayhugh’s omission of Iraq, Kahane recalled last week,
“seemed a little bit strange.” Still, she said,
“These e-mails were often slightly tempting to me,
because of my worries about paying for medical school.”

On March 14th, Kahane received another e-mail from
Mayhugh, with the subject “Medical school scholarships
still available.” This time, rather than invoking
European and tropical destinations, Mayhugh addressed
the prospect of being posted to a less than desirable
locale. “What if you get sent to Iraq?” he wrote
in the letter’s final paragraph. He continued:

Well, consider this: there has been an average of
160,000 troops in the Iraq theater of operations during
the last 22 months, and a total of 2112 deaths, that
gives a firearm death rate of 60 per 100,000. The rate
in Washington, D.C. is 80.6 per 100,000. That means
that you are about 25% more likely to be shot and
killed in our Nation’s Capitol, which has some
of the strictest gun control laws in the nation,
than you are in Iraq.

Kahane recalled, “After reading it once, I felt
strongly that something was wrong, but I didn’t
know what.” She looked up the figures and did the
math herself, and found that all the statistics
in the e-mail were either outdated or incorrect,
and that, even if they had been correct, Mayhugh
seemed to be comparing a yearly figure for Washington
with a monthly one for Iraq. (Going by Mayhugh’s
numbers, there would be nearly fifteen gun murders
in Washington every day. In reality, there were
about three murders, of any kind, per week in 2006.
In the same period, an average of sixteen American
troops died each week in Iraq.) Kimberly Thompson,
an associate professor of risk analysis and decision
science at Harvard’s School of Public Health, agreed,
last week, to evaluate Mayhugh’s claim and found the
discrepancy even starker. In her estimate, the risk
of being killed in Iraq is ten times higher than
the risk of being killed in Washington, D.C. “The
recruiter’s e-mail message is really amazingly
misleading,” she said.

It turns out, as Kahane learned with a subsequent
Google search, that “D.C. is more dangerous than
Iraq” is a well-worn canard. Representative Steve
King, a Republican from Iowa, promulgated a variation,
involving his wife’s safety, last year on the floor
of the House, while Mayhugh’s paragraph was plucked,
verbatim, from an e-mail that circulated in 2005.
The realization that Mayhugh’s message derived—one
could see, with nominal research—from a Web fallacy
was dispiriting to Kahane. She had written a letter
to Mayhugh, but didn’t send it. “I thought, I guess
he knows the math isn’t right, so what’s the point
of telling him?” she said.

Reached last week at his office in Maryland, Mayhugh
stood by the e-mail, saying, “Most people’s perception
of Iraq is that ‘Oh, my God, people are being murdered
over there by the thousands.’ I think if you look at
any type of situation where you have several hundred
thousand people on the ground and now you throw in the
fact that what they’re doing is dangerous and they
have very big heavy vehicles and firearms with live
ammunition, the number of people being killed over
there is pretty small.”

He acknowledged that the paragraph had come from
a forwarded e-mail, but said that, before pasting
it into his pitch, he had done “some simple calculations”
that supported its conclusions. “In what I’ve seen
in dealing with the war and the misperceptions of it,”
he said, “it seemed to me like those would be the right
numbers.” He went on, “I work in D.C. on a daily basis,
and I’m afraid to get out of my car in a lot of places.
I hear about police officers being murdered every day
in D.C. and Baltimore. And I’ve had thousands of friends
and colleagues go to Iraq and come back safely.”

Illustration: TOM BACHTELL

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

2) No hope in Guantánamo
BY JOSHUA COLANGELO-BRYAN
MIAMI HERALD
Apr. 05, 2007
http://www.miamiherald.com/851/v-print/story/64032.html

On Monday, I was at Guantánamo Bay to meet with Jumah
Al Dossari, one of the detainees my firm represents.
As always, I spent the first few hours of our meeting
trying to convince Jumah to fight the desperation
and hopelessness that threaten what little spirit
he has left.

Jumah has been at Guantánamo for more than five
years. The government has never charged him with
a crime and does not accuse him of taking any action
against the United States. For several years, Jumah
has been held alone in solid-wall cells from which
he cannot see other detainees or communicate except
by yelling. He has spent 22 to 24 hours a day by
himself in these cells. He has been short shackled,
threatened with death and, once, severly beaten.
Interrogators have told him that he will be at
Guantánamo for the next 50 years and that there
is no law at Guantánamo.

Sometimes the idea of spending the rest of his
life locked up thousands of miles from his family
is too much for Jumah. On Oct. 15, 2005, I walked
into an interview room to visit him. There was
blood on the floor. I looked up and saw Jumah
hanging by his neck from the other side of a metal
mesh wall that divided his cell from our meeting
area. He was bleeding from a gash in his arm.

I couldn't reach Jumah because the door to the
cell was locked. I yelled for guards who came,
unlocked the door and cut the noose from Jumah's
neck. I was ordered out of the room but later learned
that Jumah had survived. Since that day, Jumah
has tried to kill himself three times. Last spring
he slashed his throat with a razor, spraying blood
on the ceiling of his cell.

During our meeting on Monday, we talked about Jumah's
court case, a bleak—and therefore dangerous—subject.
I explained again that the Bush administration insists
it may detain anyone it designates an ''enemy combatant''
forever without a trial. I explained how Congress blessed
that notion in last year's Military Commissions Act,
which bars foreign ''enemy combatants'' from going to
court to challenge that designation. I explained that
lawyers for the detainees had challenged the act as
unconstitutional, but that in February a federal appeals
had ruled against us on the grounds that people like
Jumah have no rights.

Desperately wanting to boost his spirits, I also told
Jumah that there was reason to be optimistic. We had
asked the Supreme Court to review the appeals court
decision and we felt pretty sure that our request
would be granted. Were that to happen, Jumah might
be a step closer to a court hearing.

At noon, I went to the galley—as the cafeteria at
Guantánamo is called—to get lunch for Jumah and myself.
While waiting for a burger, I glanced up at a television
tuned to CNN. Text ran across the bottom of the screen:
``Supreme Court refuses to hear Guantánamo detainee
appeals until alternative procedures are exhausted.''

Our request—the one reason I had given Jumah to be
optimistic—had been denied. The Supreme Court was
saying it might consider the detainees' cases, but
not until the detainees subjected themselves
to proceedings created by the Military Commissions Act.

It is a disturbing ruling because the government
says the purpose of these proceedings is not to
determine if a detainee is actually an ''enemy combatant''
but rather to determine if the military followed its own
rules in applying the ''enemy combatant'' label. For that
reason, detainees will have no chance to produce evidence
of their innocence that the military didn't consider
or to challenge the use of evidence obtained through
torture. Worse yet, these procedures will be held
before the same appeals court that recently found
the detainees have no rights at all.

I walked slowly back to the room where Jumah sat
shackled. I wondered if there was a good way to tell
a suicidal man that all three branches of our government
appear content to let him rot at Guantánamo. Nothing
came to mind.

Maybe I shouldn't have worried. Jumah's reaction
to bad legal news has become as muted as his emotions
generally. He long ago stopped believing that a court
will ever hear his case and thinks I'm naive for hoping
otherwise. Instead, Jumah believes that he has been
condemned to live forever on an island where there
is no law. He may well be right.

Joshua Colangelo-Bryan, an attorney, represents
several Guantánamo detainees.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

3) WE'VE BEEN SURGING FOR YEARS
By Don Monkerud
TomPaine.com
April 6, 2007
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2007/04/06/weve_been_surging_for_years.php

The number of U.S. forces involved in Iraq are at least twice the number
quoted in the media. The administration uses a number of deceptions,
definitional illusions and euphemisms -- including counting only "combat
forces" and "military personnel" -- to drastically undercount the invasion
force.

Even President Bush's January announcement of a "surge" of 21,500 U.S.
troops, opposed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has now morphed into 30,000
troops with an additional "headquarters staff" of 3,000 -- or more than 50
percent more than the official number. The currently reported total U.S.
military in Iraq is 145,000, forces which are required to occupy a country
slightly more than twice the size of Idaho.

The real number is almost impossible to find in government-released
information, even with a great amount of interpretation. It’s hidden
because few in the administration want to disclose the true extent of vast
U.S. resources invested in personnel, material, and other costs.

GlobalSecurity.org is a public policy organization that provides
background information on defense and homeland security. They note that
keeping track of American forces has become "significantly more difficult
as the military seeks to improve operational security and to deceive
potential enemies and the media as to the extent of American operations."

According to John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org, there are a number
of other reasons affecting the accurate counting of the number of military
forces involved in Iraq. Large numbers of troops are activated with
unspecified duties to unspecified areas; many small units from various
locations are being mobilized from the Army and National Guard, which
count units differently; and groups rotate in and out of Iraqi so quickly
it's impossible for anyone but the Pentagon to calculate how many are
there. The Pentagon tracks these numbers, but Pike says they aren't
telling.

"We only try to nail the numbers down when we think Americans are getting
ready to blow someone up," Pike says. "The Pentagon knows the numbers and
we have certainly not done anything to highball it. Certainly, if there's
a chance to release or hold numbers, they are parsimonious."

Additionally, private enterprise military "contractors" almost double the
number of U.S. forces in Iraq. After four contractors were hung from a
bridge in Fallujah in March 2004, the Bush administration stonewalled
congressional efforts to force the Pentagon to release information about
the number of contractors in Iraq. Finally, the Pentagon reported a total
of 25,000.

In "The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security,"
Deborah D. Avant, director for the Institute for Global and Internal
Studies at George Washington University, reports that official numbers are
difficult to find, but "This is the largest deployment of U.S. contractors
in a military operation."

In October, the military's first census of contractors totaled 100,000,
not counting subcontractors. And in February 2007, the Associated Press
reported 120,000 contractors (which would put Bush's "surge" closer to
50,000). Contractors, which some call mercenaries, provide support
services essential to maintaining the U.S. military presence in Iraq. Ten
times the number of contractors employed during the Persian Gulf War,
these contract mercenaries now cook meals, interrogate prisoners, fix flat
tires, repair vehicles, and provide guard duty.

Military personnel formerly filled these types of jobs until former
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld instituted his "Total Force" plan,
which relies on a smaller U.S. military force with "its active and reserve
military components, its civil servants, and its contractors." Senator
Jim Webb of Virginia called this a "rent-an-army."

What are the total of U.S. forces are in Iraq? The government reported
145,000 U.S. military forces in Iraq, but John Pike estimates the current
total at 150,000. Another 20,000 will arrive as part of the "surge," a
last gasp public relations effort to save the operation from total
failure.

John Pike estimates another 30,000 are "in the theater" to provide
"Operation Iraqi Freedom" support. The Army and Marines have another
10,000 to 20,000 in Kuwait, and a nearby Air Force wing-bombing group has
5,000. Current naval exercises in the Persian Gulf, which represents a
show of force against Iran, include 10,000 U.S. personnel, the carrier
groups Eisenhower and the Stennis, and 15 warships.

Add the 120,000 contract mercenaries and the forces involved in the Iraqi
operation and the total comes to 300,000 to 360,000, more than twice the
"official" figure of 145,000 troops. This isn't counting the more than
5,000 British combat troops and navy, down from a high of 40,000 during
the initial invasion, or the ragtag remnants of the highly vaunted
"Coalition of the Willing," which has dwindled since the beginning of the
occupation to 27, mostly small, countries such as Armenia, Estonia,
Moldavia, and Latvia.

Manipulated figures and private military contractors provide the Bush
Administration with political cover to escape public scrutiny and keep
injuries, deaths, and secret operations out of the public eye. A more
accurate and honest view of participation in the Iraqi occupation by the
government could give Americans more reason to oppose the waste of lives
and resources on this ill-conceived, poorly planned, and disastrous
venture.

--Don Monkerud is an California-based writer who follows cultural, social
and political issues. He can be reached at monkerud@cruzio.com.


*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

4) Permanent drought predicted for Southwest
"Study says global warming threatens to create a
Dust Bowl-like period. Water politics could
also get heated."
By Alan Zarembo and Bettina Boxall
Times Staff Writers
April 6, 2007
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-swdrought6apr06,0,122112.story?coll=la-home-headlines

The driest periods of the last century ˜ the Dust
Bowl of the 1930s and the droughts of the 1950s ˜
may become the norm in the Southwest United
States within decades because of global warming,
according to a study released Thursday.

The research suggests that the transformation may
already be underway. Much of the region has been
in a severe drought since 2000, which the study's
analysis of computer climate models shows as the
beginning of a long dry period.

The study, published online in the journal
Science, predicted a permanent drought by 2050
throughout the Southwest ˜ one of the fastest-
growing regions in the nation.

The data tell "a story which is pretty darn scary
and very strong," said Jonathan Overpeck, a
climate researcher at the University of Arizona
who was not involved in the study.

Richard Seager, a research scientist at
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia
University and the lead author of the study, said
the changes would force an adjustment to the
social and economic order from Colorado
to California.

"There are going to be some tough decisions on
how to allocate water," he said. "Is it going to
be the cities, or is it going to be agriculture?"

Seager said the projections, based on 19 computer
models, showed a surprising level of agreement.
"There is only one model that does not have
a drying trend," he said.

Philip Mote, an atmospheric scientist at the
University of Washington who was not involved in
the study, added, "There is a convergence of the
models that is very strong and very worrisome."

The future effect of global warming is the
subject of a United Nations report to be released
today in Brussels, the second of four installments
being unveiled this year.

The first report from the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change was released in February. It
declared that global warming had become a
"runaway train" and that human activities were
"very likely" to blame.

The landmark report helped shift the long and
rancorous political debate over climate change
from whether man-made warming was real to what
could be done about it.

The mechanics and patterns of drought in the
Southwest have been the focus of increased
scrutiny in recent years.

During the last period of significant, prolonged
drought ˜ the Medieval Climate Optimum from about
the years 900 to 1300 ˜ the region experienced
dry periods that lasted as long as 20 years,
scientists say.

Drought research has largely focused on the
workings of air currents that arise from
variations in sea-surface temperature in the
Pacific Ocean known as El Niño and La Niña.

The most significant in terms of drought is La
Niña. During La Niña years, precipitation belts
shift north, parching the Southwest.

The latest study investigated the possibility of
a broader, global climatic mechanism that could
cause drought. Specifically, they looked at the
Hadley cell, one of the planet's most powerful
atmospheric circulation patterns, driving weather
in the tropics and subtropics.

Within the cell, air rises at the equator, moves
toward the poles and descends over the subtropics.

Increasing levels of greenhouse gases, the
researchers said, warms the atmosphere, which
expands the poleward reach of the Hadley cell.
Dry air, which suppresses precipitation, then
descends over a wider expanse of the
Mediterranean region, the Middle East
and North America.

All of those areas would be similarly affected,
though the study examined only the effect on
North America in a swath reaching from Kansas to
California and south into Mexico.

The researchers tested a "middle of the road"
scenario of future carbon dioxide emissions to
predict rainfall and evaporation. They assumed
that emissions would rise until 2050 and then
decline. The carbon dioxide concentration in the
atmosphere would be 720 parts per million in
2100, compared with about 380 parts per million
today.

The computer models, on average, found about a
15% decline in surface moisture ˜ which is
calculated by subtracting evaporation from
precipitation ˜ from 2021 to 2040, as compared
with the average from 1950 to 2000.

A 15% drop led to the conditions that caused the
Dust Bowl in the Great Plains and the northern
Rockies during the 1930s.

Even without the circulation changes, global
warming intensifies existing patterns of vapor
transport, causing dry areas to get drier and wet
areas to get wetter. When it rains, it is likely
to rain harder, but scientists said that was
unlikely to make up for losses from a shifting
climate.

Kelly Redmond, deputy director of the Western
Regional Climate Center in Reno, who was not
involved in the study, said he thought the region
would still have periodic wet years that were
part of the natural climate variation.

But, he added, "In the future we may see fewer
such very wet years."

Although the computer models show the drying has
already started, they are not accurate enough to
know whether the drought is the result of global
warming or a natural variation.

"It's really hard to tell," said Connie
Woodhouse, a paleoclimatologist at the University
of Arizona. "It may well be one of the first
events we can attribute to global warming."

The U.S. and southern Europe will be better
prepared to deal with frequent drought than
most African nations.

For the U.S., the biggest problem would be water
shortages. The seven Colorado River Basin states
˜ Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, New Mexico,
Arizona and California ˜ would battle each other
for diminished river flows.

Mexico, which has a share of the Colorado River
under a 1944 treaty and has complained of U.S.
diversions in the past, would join the struggle.

Inevitably, water would be reallocated from
agriculture, which uses most of the West's
supply, to urban users, drying up farms.
California would come under pressure to build
desalination plants on the coast, despite
environmental concerns.

"This is a situation that is going to cause water
wars," said Kevin Trenberth, a scientist at the
National Center for Atmospheric Research
in Boulder, Colo.

"If there's not enough water to meet everybody's
allocation, how do you divide it up?"

Officials from seven states recently forged an
agreement on the current drought, which has left
the Colorado River's big reservoirs ˜ Lake Powell
and Lake Mead ˜ about half-empty. Without some
very wet years, federal water managers say,
Lake Mead may never refill.

In the next couple of years, water deliveries may
have to be reduced to Arizona and Nevada, whose
water rights are second to California.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

5) Democrats at War
WALL STREET JOURNAL
EDITORIAL
April 6, 2007; Page A10
[Via Email from: Walter Lippmann
walterlx@earthlink.net ...bw]

Democrats took Congress last fall in part by opposing the war in Iraq,
but it is becoming clear that they view their election as a mandate for
something far more ambitious -- to wit, promoting and executing their own
foreign policy, albeit without the detail of a Presidential election.

Their intentions were made plain this week with two remarkable acts by their
House and Senate leaders. Majority Leader Harry Reid endorsed Senator Russ
Feingold's proposal to withdraw from Iraq immediately, cutting off funds
entirely within a year. He promised a vote soon, as part of what the
Washington Post reported would also be a Democratic offensive to close
Guantanamo, reinstate legal rights for terror suspects, and improve
relations with Cuba.

Meanwhile, Speaker Nancy Pelosi made her now famous sojourn to Syria,
donning a head scarf and advertising that she was conducting shuttle
diplomacy between Jerusalem and Damascus. If there was any doubt that her
trip was intended as far more than a routine Congressional "fact-finding"
trip, House Foreign Affairs Chairman Tom Lantos put it to rest by declaring
that, "We have an alternative Democratic foreign policy. I view my job as
beginning with restoring overseas credibility and respect for the United
States."

Americans should understand how extraordinary this is. There have been
previous battles over U.S. foreign policy and fierce domestic criticism.
In the 1990s, these columns defended Bill Clinton against "the Republican
drift toward isolationism and political opportunism" amid the Kosovo
conflict. But rarely in U.S. history have Congressional leaders sought to
conduct their own independent diplomacy, with the Speaker acting as a Prime
Minister traveling with a Secretary of State in the person of Mr. Lantos.

Yes, Congressional Republicans have visited Syria too. But Ms. Pelosi isn't
some minority back-bencher. Without a Democrat in the White House, she and
Mr. Reid are the national leaders of their party. Even Newt Gingrich, for
all his grand domestic ambitions in 1995, took a muted stand on foreign
policy, realizing that in the American system the executive has the bulk of
national security power. He also understood he would do the country no
favors by sending a mixed message to our enemies -- at the time, Slobodan
Milosevic.

What was Ms. Pelosi hoping to accomplish, other than embarrassing President
Bush? "We were very pleased with reassurances we received from the president
that he was ready to resume the peace process," she told reporters after
meeting with dictator Bashar Assad. "We expressed our interest in using our
good offices in promoting peace between Israel and Syria."

She purported to convey a message from Israel's Ehud Olmert expressing
similar interest in "the peace process," except that the Israeli Prime
Minister felt obliged to issue a clarification noting that Ms. Pelosi had
got the message wrong. Israel hadn't changed its policy, which is that it
will negotiate only when Mr. Assad repudiates his support for terrorism and
stops trying to dominate Lebanon. As a shuttle diplomat, Ms. Pelosi needs
some practice.

Mr. Lantos probably got closer to their real intentions when he told
reporters that "This is only the beginning of our constructive dialogue
with Syria, and we hope to build on it." The Pelosi cavalcade is intended
to show that if only the Bush Administration would engage in "constructive
dialogue," the Syrians, Israelis and everyone else could all get along.

This is the same Syrian regime that has facilitated the movement of money
and insurgents to kill Americans in Iraq; that has been implicated by a U.N.
probe in the murder of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri; and that
has snubbed any number of U.S. overtures since the fall of Saddam Hussein in
2003. Perhaps if he works hard enough, Mr. Lantos can match the 22 visits to
Damascus that Bill Clinton's Secretary of State Warren Christopher made in
the 1990s trying to squeeze peace from that same stone.

In fact, Ms. Pelosi and Mr. Lantos both voted for the Syria Accountability
and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003 that ordered Mr. Bush to
choose from a menu of six sanctions to impose on Damascus. Mr. Bush chose
the weakest two sanctions and dispatched a new Ambassador to Syria in a
goodwill gesture in 2004. Only later, in the wake of the Hariri murder and
clear intelligence of Syria's role in aiding Iraqi Baathists, did Mr. Bush
conclude that Mr. Assad's real goal was to reassert control over Lebanon and
bleed Americans in Iraq.

With her trip, Ms. Pelosi has now reassured the Syrian strongman that
Mr. Bush lacks the domestic support to impose any further pressure on his
country. She has also made it less likely that Mr. Assad will cooperate with
the Hariri probe, or assist the Iraqi government in defeating Baathist and
al Qaeda terrorists.
* * *

Back in Washington, Harry Reid says his response to Mr. Bush's certain veto
of his Iraq spending bill will be to escalate. He now supports cutting off
funds and beginning an immediate withdrawal, even as General David
Petraeus's surge in Baghdad unfolds and shows signs of promise. If Mr. Bush
were as politically cynical as Democrats think, he'd let Mr. Reid's policy
become law. Then Democrats would share responsibility for whatever mayhem
happened next.

So this is Democratic foreign policy: Assure our enemies that they can
ignore a President who still has 21 months to serve; and wash their hands of
Baghdad and of their own guilt for voting to let Mr. Bush go to war. No
doubt Democrats think the President's low job approval, and public
unhappiness with the war, gives them a kind of political immunity. But we
wonder.

Once we leave Iraq, America's enemies will still reside in the Mideast; and
they will be stronger if we leave behind a failed government and bloodbath
in Iraq. Mr. Bush's successor will have to contain the damage, and that
person could even be a Democrat. But by reverting to their Vietnam message
of retreat and by blaming Mr. Bush for all the world's ills, Democrats on
Capitol Hill may once again convince voters that they can't be trusted with
the White House in a dangerous world.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

6) Ford Pays Chief $28 Million for 4 Months’ Work
By NICK BUNKLEY
April 6, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/06/business/06ford.html?ref=businessspecial

The Ford Motor Company paid its new chief executive,
Alan R. Mulally, $28.18 million in his first four months
on the job, the automaker said in a regulatory filing
yesterday.

His compensation included an $18.5 million bonus that
Ford, which reported a record $12.7 billion loss last
year, disclosed in September when it hired him from
Boeing.

Figures in Ford’s annual proxy statement show that his
pay was more than three times that of any other executive
at the company. That includes the executive chairman,
William Clay Ford Jr., who has kept a 2005 promise not
to accept any new salary, bonus or stock awards until
Ford consistently earns a profit.

The second-highest pay, $8.67 million, was also for only
a few months’ work; it went to James J. Padilla, who
retired as president and chief operating officer in July.

Three executives received bonuses for their roles
in reducing manufacturing capacity, cutting costs
and achieving other goals as part of Ford’s overhaul
plan, known as the Way Forward. The awards were part
of a retention program that the company recently
abandoned.

Mark Fields, president of the Americas division, earned
$2.29 million of his $5.57 million in total compensation
from that program. Lewis W. K. Booth, executive vice
president for Europe, received a $1.7 million retention
incentive, while Don R. Leclair, Ford’s chief financial
officer, received $1.32 million.

Ford said it spent $517,560 to give Mr. Fields use
of a company jet in 2006, a perk he stopped using
in January after it received considerable negative
publicity. Ford now buys first-class commercial airfares
to fly Mr. Fields from company offices in Dearborn, Mich.,
to his family’s home in South Florida each weekend.

Executive compensation at all three Detroit automakers
has been closely scrutinized since they began revamping
plans that will close dozens of factories and eliminate
tens of thousands of jobs. They are trying to overcome
multibillion-dollar losses and compete better with
foreign-based rivals like Toyota and Honda.

This year, as the automakers negotiate a new labor
agreement with the United Automobile Workers union,
workers are certain to resist demands for concessions
if they consider executive salaries to be excessive.

Union members have criticized the awarding of restricted
stock option bonuses to top executives at General Motors
— although G.M. paid no cash bonuses for the second
consecutive year — and a proposal at Ford to pay bonuses
to executives there. Ford later announced a program
to pay modest bonuses of at least $300 to all employees.

Mr. Mulally earned a base salary of $666,667, or $2 million
annualized. He was granted a $7.5 million signing bonus
and $11 million to make up for bonuses and stock options
he forfeited by leaving Boeing. Ford valued the stock and
option awards he received last year at $8.68 million.

In his final year at Boeing, where he headed the commercial
airplanes division, Mr. Mulally earned a total
of $9.96 million.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

7) Comcast Chief Executive Receives $26 Million
By GERALDINE FABRIKANT
March 30, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/30/business/businessspecial/30comcast.pay.html?ex=1176091200&en=a355f91bce1d207c&ei=5070

The Comcast Corporation, the nation’s largest cable company,
paid its chief executive, Brian L. Roberts, a total
of $26 million last year, according to its proxy
statement released today.

That figure included a salary of $2.5 million, a bonus
of $3 million and other payments including a cash
bonus of $8.4 million.

Mr. Roberts’s pay exceeded by just $2 million that
of his father, Ralph J. Roberts, who is chairman
of the executive and finance committees.

The pay package for Ralph Roberts, who was a founder
of the company but is no longer its chief executive
or chairman, has annoyed some investors over the years.
Mr. Roberts, who is 87, earned a total of $24.1 million
last year, a figure that included a salary of $1.8 million,
an option award of $3.7 million and another payment
of $10.3 million, which included $4.1 million related
to life insurance premiums.

David L. Cohen, the company’s executive vice president,
defended the compensation structure. "Our compensation
plan is carefully designed to align executive
compensation with the company’s annual and long-term
performance goals and with shareholder interests,”
he wrote in an e-mail message.

Comcast’s stock did better last year than it had done
previously, rising from $17.48 a share at the beginning
of the year to $28.22 a share at the end of the year.

In 2005, Glass Lewis & Company, a research firm that
advises institutional shareholders on governance issues,
argued that Brian Roberts, his father and three top managers
were grossly overpaid. At the time several investors said
privately that they were particularly annoyed that Ralph
Roberts continued to receive a lucrative pay package when
he was no longer chairman. In 2005, Comcast stock declined
21 percent. The company said that a portion of Ralph Roberts’
pay was determined by arrangements made when he was the
chief executive.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

8) No Bonuses for Top G.M. Executives
By NICK BUNKLEY
March 29, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/29/business/businessspecial/29gmpay.html?ex=1176091200&en=b3bcb33a8bceaa23&ei=5070

DETROIT, March 28 — General Motors, which significantly
improved its financial performance in 2006 yet did not
earn a profit, said on Wednesday that for a second
consecutive year, it would not pay cash bonuses
to top executives.

Such bonuses would undoubtedly have rankled members
of the United Automobile Workers union ahead of this
summer’s contract talks, although a G.M. spokeswoman,
Renee Rashid-Merem, declined to say whether the pending
negotiations were a factor.

“It’s a decision that’s made on an annual basis,”
Ms. Rashid-Merem said. She added that the decision
affected about 20 managers, including the chief
executive, Rick Wagoner, and the vice chairman,
Robert A. Lutz.

Full details on executives’ compensation will be
released next month when the company files its annual
proxy statement.

Last week, some U.A.W. members expressed anger
after G.M. disclosed in regulatory filings that
Mr. Wagoner and other top executives would receive
bonuses in the form of restricted stock options.
G.M. had not awarded stock options since 2003.

The union, which concluded a two-day collective
bargaining convention Wednesday in Detroit, also
grew irritated recently when executives at the
Ford Motor Company said they were considering
management bonuses. Instead, Ford said it would
give bonuses of at least $300 to all employees.

Union members say the leaders of Detroit’s automakers
should not receive incentives at a time that they
are eliminating tens of thousands of jobs and
cutting benefits for hourly workers and retirees.
Ford lost $12.7 billion last year, while G.M.
posted a $2 billion loss.

G.M.’s decision to forgo cash bonuses this year,
as it did in 2006 after the company lost $10.4 billion,
was first reported Wednesday afternoon
by Bloomberg News.

During this week’s bargaining convention, the U.A.W.’s
president, Ron Gettelfinger, repeatedly criticized
executives at the Delphi Corporation, the auto supplier
that declared bankruptcy in 2005, for collecting
bonuses while trying to cut hourly workers’ pay
and benefits. Delphi says the $37 million in incentive
pay recently approved by a bankruptcy judge is necessary
to keep top executives from leaving.

Mr. Gettelfinger did not specifically disparage executives
at the automakers, but he made clear that the union intended
to vigorously fight any demands made during the contract
talks that workers agree to concessions.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

9) Cuban jet bombing suspect ordered free on bail in U.S.
"Venezuela and Cuba want Luis Posada Carriles in a 1976 plane bombing
that killed 73. But in this country, the former CIA operative
is charged with lying to immigration officials."
By Carol J. Williams
Times Staff Writer
April 7, 2007
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-posada7apr07,1,7020766.story?coll=la-news-a_section

MIAMI — A federal judge Friday ordered Cuban militant Luis Posada
Carriles freed from a New Mexico jail, ruling he be allowed to live
under electronic surveillance with his family in Miami while awaiting
trial May 11 on charges of lying to immigration authorities.

The move to free the 79-year-old, who is suspected of blowing up a
Cuban airliner in 1976 and bombing Havana hotels in the late 1990s,
sparked outrage in Cuba. The Communist Party newspaper Granma posted
the news on its website under a headline that read: "Blackmail Gets
Results."

Posada has never been charged in U.S. courts in connection with those
terrorist acts, his critics contend, because he likely threatened to
disclose other violence committed during his decades of covert work
with the CIA.

A Bay of Pigs veteran who once served time in Panama for plotting to
kill Cuban leader Fidel Castro, Posada has become a political
conundrum for the Bush administration. The president and his
Republican allies have benefited from the support of influential
Cuban exiles in Miami, many of whom view Posada as a patriotic
freedom fighter.

Posada entered the United States illegally in March 2005, about eight
months after he and three other Florida-based Cuban militants were
pardoned on illegal weapons and conspiracy charges by outgoing
Panamanian President Mireya Moscoso.

The move came four years into Posada's eight-year sentence, and was
seen as a favor to Bush, whose reelection in November 2004 was riding
on the continued backing of Miami Cubans.

The other three men, all U.S. citizens, arrived here to a hero's
welcome while Posada — Cuban-born and Venezuela-naturalized — made
his way home clandestinely. Posada held a Miami news conference,
fueling foreign outcry that the U.S. government was providing refuge
for a terrorist. He was arrested in May 2005. Cuba and Venezuela want
Posada extradited to stand trial for the Cubana de Aviacion bombing
that killed all 73 on board the Caracas to Havana flight.

Posada escaped from prison in Venezuela in 1985 while he awaited a
third trial in the jetliner bombing off Barbados. He was acquitted
twice.

After his 2005 arrest, Posada first was held in an immigration lockup
in El Paso — where he told officials he had made his way to the
United States with the help of a smuggler via Mexico and Texas.

Cuban media, however, reported that Posada actually was picked up
from Mexico's Yucatan peninsula by a shrimp boat owned by Cuban
American developer Santiago Alvarez and brought to a Gulf Coast
marina. Alvarez is in jail following a guilty plea on weapons
violations charges.

The El Paso immigration court ordered Posada deported in September
2005, but U.S. authorities were unable to persuade any of the seven
allied countries contacted to accept him. A federal judge ruled that
he couldn't be extradited to Cuba or Venezuela because of the
possibility he would be tortured or abused in the custody of those
governments.

Last fall, Posada's Miami lawyer, Eduardo Soto, filed a writ of
habeas corpus seeking his release. Another Texas judge ordered the
federal government to charge Posada with a crime by Feb. 1 or release
him.

Then a federal grand jury in January indicted Posada on immigration
violations and transferred him to a prison in Otero County, N.M. —
voiding the deadline by placing him in custody pending a criminal
proceeding.

On Friday, shortly before the court closed for Easter weekend, U.S.
District Judge Kathleen Cardone in El Paso ordered Posada released.
She did not address a government request to keep him jailed pending
an appeal.

Posada's El Paso attorney, Felipe D.J. Millan, could not be reached
for comment. But he told the Associated Press it was unlikely Posada
would be released over the holiday weekend.

"He deserves to go home and live in peace and enjoy his family,"
Millan said. "Obviously we'll do whatever we need to do to post bond.
We'll try to get him [out] as soon as possible."

Cardone's nine-page ruling required Posada to post a $250,000 bond,
and mandated that his wife and two adult children put up $100,000
bond to ensure their compliance with other conditions of his release,
including 24-hour home confinement and wearing an electronic
monitoring device.

carol.williams@latimes.com

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

10) City asks court to quit Abu-Jamal case
By MARYCLAIRE DALE, Associated Press Writer1
April 6, 2007
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070406/ap_on_re_us/mumia_abu_jamal

Prosecutors want the entire 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to recuse
itself from the latest appeal for death-row inmate Mumia Abu-Jamal because
Gov. Ed Rendell ˜ whose wife serves on the court ˜ was district attorney
during his trial.

Abu-Jamal, a former radio reporter and Black Panther, was convicted in
1982 of killing a police officer. In his latest appeal, his attorneys say
prosecutors practiced racial discrimination during jury selection; an
allegation prosecutors deny.

"Since Mr. Rendell was the elected district attorney at the time in
question, and so would have been responsible for the supposed 'routine'
racially discriminatory practices of Philadelphia prosecutors, Abu-Jamal's
accusations necessarily implicate Mr. Rendell personally," Assistant
District Attorney Hugh J. Burns Jr. wrote in a motion last week.

A federal judge in 2001 overturned Abu-Jamal's death sentence but upheld
his conviction. Both sides appealed that ruling to the 3rd Circuit, whose
members include the governor's wife, Marjorie O. Rendell.

Prosecutors could simply ask for Judge Rendell to recuse herself but they
want to avoid any possible grounds for a future appeal.

Abu-Jamal was convicted in the Dec. 9, 1981, shooting death officer Daniel
Faulkner after the officer pulled over Abu-Jamal's brother. He remains on
death row during the appeals.

His writings and taped speeches on the justice system have made Abu-Jamal
a popular figure among activists who believe he was the victim of a racist
justice system. Abu-Jamal is black; Faulkner was white.

Abu-Jamal's lawyer, Robert R. Bryan of San Francisco, opposes Byrne's
motion, according to court records. He did not return telephone messages
seeking comment.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

11) Hot and Cold
Editorial
April 8,2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/opinion/08sun1.html?hp

Last week began with a Supreme Court decision declaring
that the federal government had the authority to regulate
greenhouse gas emissions and all but ordering the Bush
administration to do so. It ended with a report from
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — the
world’s authoritative voice on global warming — warning
that failure to contain these emissions will have
disastrous environmental effects, especially in poorer
countries, which are least able to defend themselves
and their people against the consequences of climate
change.

One would hope that these events would shake President
Bush out of his state of denial and add his authority
to the chorus of governors, legislators and business
leaders calling for an aggressive regulatory and
technological response to the dangers of global warming.
They haven’t. When asked about the Supreme Court decision,
the president said he thought he was already doing enough.

He argued further that there was little point in the
United States’ doing any more unless other polluters
like China acted as well. That ignores the reality
that no developing country is going to move unless
the United States — which produces one-fourth
of the world’s emissions with only 5 percent
of its population — takes the lead.

The report from the intergovernmental panel was
the second of three due this year. The first
concluded with “90 percent certainty” that humans
had caused the rise in atmospheric temperatures
over the last half-century. The most recent
focused on the consequences, few of them positive.

The northern latitudes will have longer growing
seasons. But elsewhere climate change will lead
to more severe storms, the flooding of tropical
islands and coastlines inhabited by hundreds of
millions of people, the likely extinction of at
least one-fourth of the world’s species and,
in poorer countries in Asia and Africa, drought
and hunger.

Some of these changes have begun. “We’re no longer
arm-waving with models,” said Martin Parry, the
co-chairman of the team that wrote the report.
But the report also makes clear that while
emissions already accumulated in the atmosphere
make some damage inevitable, the worst can be
avoided if the world’s nations take swift action
to stabilize and then reverse emissions.

What must be avoided, the report said, is a rise
of 3 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit, the point at which
truly devastating effects will begin to kick in.
But such a rise is almost inevitable over the
next century if the world continues to do
business as usual.

The panel’s next paper will discuss alternatives
to business as usual. These policies will almost
certainly require a major shift in the way energy
is produced and used, as well as massive investments
in new technologies. They will also be expensive.
But what the world’s scientists are telling us,
with increasing confidence, is that the costs
of doing nothing will be far greater than the
costs of acting now.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

12) Doctor’s Index Predicts Fate for Migrants in the Desert
"...more than 100 adult male
immigrants had died of heatstroke annually in Pima
County."
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
April 8, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/us/08immig.html

TUCSON, April 7 (AP) — An emergency room physician
has devised a scientific index to predict the likelihood
that illegal immigrants will die while walking through
the Arizona desert in extreme heat conditions.

The physician, Dr. Samuel Keim, concluded that the
probability of death reached 50 percent when the
temperature climbed to 104 degrees.

“It’s like a weather forecast,” said the Rev. Robin
Hoover, whose Humane Borders group maintains water
stations at desert sites in southern Arizona and
northern Mexico. “If he can forecast it to the
U.S. Border Patrol, more of their agents can be
scattered out looking for people in trouble.”

Dr. Keim said he hoped to begin issuing daily
forecasts by May, but he had not determined how
to disseminate the information and with whom
to share it.

“We’re still negotiating that with various different
entities,” he said, declining to give specifics
because of worries that the intense political
debate surrounding illegal immigration could
scare off participants.

Deaths of migrants on the Arizona-Mexico border
have soared in recent years as tighter border
security sends people to more-remote desert
areas. Some migrants cross 50 or more miles
of desert.

In July 2005, Border Patrol agents recovered
72 dead illegal immigrants in the agency’s
Tucson sector. Nearly all died from heat
exposure.

Ron Bellavia, commander of the Border Patrol’s
rescue operations in the Tucson area, said
an index like Dr. Keim’s “would be an appropriate
measure to probably reduce exposure or
environmental injuries.”

The forecasts could also be shared with groups
near Mexican migrant-staging areas, where the
warnings could be posted, Mr. Hoover said.

For years, the Border Patrol and the Mexican
government have issued announcements about the
desert’s heat-related perils, but Dr. Keim said
he did not know whether migrants read or heeded
them.

Dr. Keim matched heatstroke victims with dates
of death and desert temperatures using data
collected from 2002 to 2006 in Pima County.

Dr. Keim, an associate professor at the University
of Arizona and an emergency room physician in Tucson,
said that in recent years more than 100 adult male
immigrants had died of heatstroke annually in Pima
County.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

13) Trail of Tears
By ELIZABETH ROYTE
(RE: THE LONG EXILE
A Tale of Inuit Betrayal and Survival in the High Arctic.
By Melanie McGrath.
268 pp. Alfred A. Knopf. $24.95.)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/books/review/Royte.t.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1176050987-kCJ3ZpwQ2uOi7Yadi5MjcA

Throughout human history, seemingly simple turns of events
have changed the fates of individuals and nations. In 1906,
Thomas Watt Coslett invented a way to keep iron corset
stays from rusting, and the bottom fell out of the
whale-bone market. The whalers who remained on the
eastern shore of Hudson Bay switched to trading for
the creamy pelts of the Arctic fox, which local Inuit,
on the Ungava Peninsula, began to trap in ever greater
numbers. But when prices for skins fell in 1950, at
a time when fox populations had also crashed, trappers —
formerly subsistence hunters — moved to trading posts
and begged rations from the Canadian police.

Meanwhile the cold war raged, and the Canadian
government became increasingly concerned about
its sovereignty in the east Arctic archipelago.
The United States and Canada jointly ran a weather
station on Ellesmere Island, but Canadian officials
wanted permanent residents there. The remedy to both
the geopolitical and welfare problems was simple:
uproot the Ungava Inuit and plant them 1,200 miles
north, on Ellesmere. In “The Long Exile,” Melanie
McGrath tells the story of this forced relocation —
a tale of almost unrelenting horror — with so much
moral vigor and descriptive verve that one quits
reading only long enough to shake one’s head in
disbelief. And then, with a shiver, reads on.

To succeed on Hudson Bay, the Inuit needed to know
everything about their immediate surroundings: the
landmarks, the animals’ travel and migration routes,
the location of fresh-water springs, berries, bird
eggs and willow-worm cocoons to dip into seal fat
for dinner. Describing the land’s natural features
with lyrical precision, McGrath emphasizes that
the harsh physical realities of this place shaped
not only how the Inuit lived but also their
personalities, making a strong case that psychology
is destiny. At one time, expressing rage, lust or
ambition were considered so threatening to Inuit
group survival that persistent offenders were
banished. But while serenity and self-restraint
were adaptive in the Inuit’s ancestral environment,
their unwillingness to speak out, on Ellesmere,
would almost kill them.

It was the late summer of 1953 when the Canadian
government deposited three reluctant Inuit families,
including a master carver named Paddy Aqiatusuk,
on a narrow Ellesmere beach. They had been promised
abundant game and a return ticket in one year’s
time if they were unhappy. They were, in fact,
instantly miserable.

At 81 degrees north latitude, Ellesmere is, McGrath
notes, the harshest terrain that humans have ever
continuously inhabited. A high arctic desert, its
interior is “an impenetrable mass of frozen crags
and deep fjords.” The Inuit soon learned that marine
mammals were scarce, as were caribou, fox and fresh
water. Their clothing wasn’t warm enough, and their
sleds and harnesses were all wrong for the rocky
terrain. The rough waters made hunting by kayak
impossible, and the dry wind made their dogs’ lungs
bleed. Sufficient snow for snow houses arrived late,
leaving the settlers in flimsy canvas tents until
late winter. There wasn’t enough fuel for fires.
The air was almost 30 degrees colder than back home,
and the near constant wind made it feel more than
50 degrees worse. Four months of darkness “made
hunting an almost daily terror,” McGrath writes.
Ellesmere supported a small musk ox population,
but the police detachment, 40 miles from the Inuit
encampment, forbade killing them. The starving
Inuit ate bird feathers, made broth from boot
liners. “The children leaked diarrhea then vomit
which the women in the camp fed to the dogs rather
than have it go to waste.”

Too reticent to complain, even when to save her
family from starvation, Aqiatusuk’s 6-year-old
granddaughter was forced onto the ice to hunt in
total darkness, the Inuit persevered. When they
finally screwed up their courage and asked to go
home, the police refused. It was logistically
complicated: the Inuit must cope. Government careers
were on the line: the colony had to succeed. Its
inhabitants were the equivalent of national flags
fluttering in the wind.

McGrath, wickedly talented, brings every bit of
this to life (helped by her Inuit subjects’
preternatural memory for details). We hear the
gnash of the ice (“a terrible, raw, geologic sound”),
feel the pangs of hunger and thirst. We feel, too,
the Inuit’s aching sense of abandonment and betrayal,
their utter disorientation in a land where they knew
nothing of the animal routes, the sea’s eddies and
currents or the habits of wind and ice. Such details
are not a matter of comfort, they are a matter
of survival. McGrath is a meticulous researcher
— she took the trouble to learn the names and
colors of lichens that grow on rocks beneath
bird colonies and fox lookouts — and she writes
as if she’d lived in the Arctic for years. The
book moves quickly, to a drumbeat of doom. As
the Inuit approach their new home, “the frail
summer had already begun to sicken and the sky
pressed down on the land like a dead hand.”

McGrath, who has written three previous books,
is smart to focus on Aqiatusuk and his extended
family. They humanize her tale, which includes
a history of exploration in the eastern Canadian
Arctic and of the relentless exploitation of Inuits
by whites. Aqiatusuk was the adoptive father of
a boy named Josephie, whose real father was the
American Robert Flaherty, the director of “Nanook
of the North.” Filmed on the Ungava Peninsula
in the 1920s, the so-called documentary idealized
the Inuit as innocents in an unblemished land.
The movie colored the Western view of Inuit life
in the Arctic for generations as it traveled the
globe winning prizes, immortalizing a world that
never existed. Actually, the Inuit way of life
was already tainted by white fur traders by the
time Flaherty arrived (he himself was financially
backed by a trader), and the film’s starring family
was entirely contrived, just like the settlement
on Ellesmere, a place with no history or purpose
beyond politics. According to McGrath, Flaherty
made Nanook out of admiration for the Inuit’s “raw
unquestioning confidence,” qualities shattered by
the move to Ellesmere. As an adult, Josephie Flaherty,
whose mother starred in “Nanook” (and cohabited
with Flaherty), would follow Aqiatusuk to Ellesmere
and die there, a broken man. But his daughter Martha,
the child hunter and granddaughter of Robert Flaherty,
eventually escaped and later forced the Canadian
government to reckon with its crimes.

As the years wore on, the Inuit gradually learned
how to survive on Ellesmere. They constructed huts
from scrap wood, revamped their sleds and dog harnesses.
They learned the beluga’s migration route and would
eventually hunt over a range of 6,864 square miles
each year. In 1962, the government sent a teacher
to the island, but only two school books: one on
how to run a bank, the other called “The Roads
of Texas.”

Forty years after the first families left Ungava
for Ellesmere, the Canadian government held hearings
to investigate the relocation program. At its conclusion,
the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples called
the relocation “one of the worst human rights violations
in the history of Canada.” The country was shocked
by the abuse and arrogance of its leaders, who
eventually made financial reparations of 10 million
Canadian dollars to the survivors and their families.
But the government has yet to apologize.

Elizabeth Royte, whose “Garbage Land: On the Secret
Trail of Trash,” has recently been published
in paperback, is a frequent contributor to the Book Review.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

14) Sociable Darwinism
By NATALIE ANGIER
April 8, 2007
(RE:EVOLUTION FOR EVERYONE
How Darwin’s Theory Can Change the
Way We Think About Our Lives.
By David Sloan Wilson.

390 pp. Delacorte Press. $24.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/books/review/Angier.t.html?ref=review

Just as in the classic clashes of nature, where every
mutational upgrade in a carnivore’s strength or cunning
is soon countered by a speedier or more paranoid model
of antelope, so the pitched struggle between evolutionary
theory and its deniers has yielded a bristling diversity
of ploys and counterploys. The heavyhanded biblical
literalism of creationist science evolves into the
feints and curlicues of intelligent design, and the
casual dismissiveness with which scientists long
regarded the anti-evolutionists gives way to a belated
awareness that, gee, the public doesn’t seem to realize
how fatuous the other side is, and maybe it’s time
to combat the creationist phylum head on. And so,
over the last few years, scientists have unleashed
a blitzkrieg of books in defense of Darwinism,
summarizing the Everest of supportive evidence
for evolutionary theory, filleting the arguments
of the naysayers or reciting, yet again, the story
of Charles Darwin, depressive naturalist extraordinaire,
whose increasingly pervasive avuncular profile has
lofted him to logo status on par with Einstein and
the Nike swoosh.

David Sloan Wilson, an evolutionary biologist at
Binghamton University, takes a different and decidedly
refreshing approach. Rather than catalog its successes,
denounce its detractors or in any way present
evolutionary theory as the province of expert tacticians
like himself, Wilson invites readers inside and shows
them how Darwinism is done, and at lesson’s end urges
us to go ahead, feel free to try it at home. The result
is a sprightly, absorbing and charmingly earnest book
that manages a minor miracle, the near-complete
emulsifying of science and the “real world,” ingredients
too often kept stubbornly, senselessly apart. Only when
Wilson seeks to add religion to the mix, and to show
what natural, happy symbionts evolutionary biology
and religious faith can be, does he begin to sound
like a corporate motivational speaker or a political
candidate glad-handing the crowd.

In Wilson’s view, Darwin’s theory of evolution by
natural selection has the beauty of being both
simple and profound. Unlike quantum mechanics or
the general theory of relativity, the basic concepts
behind evolutionary theory are easy to grasp; and
once grasped, he argues, they can be broadly applied
to better understand ourselves and the world — the
world both as it is and as it might be, with the
right bit of well-informed coaxing. Wilson has long
been interested in the evolution of cooperative and
altruistic behavior, and much of the book is devoted
to the premise that “goodness can evolve, at least
when the appropriate conditions are met.” As he sees
it, all of life is characterized by a “cosmic” struggle
between good and evil, the high-strung terms we apply
to behaviors that are either cooperative or selfish,
civic or anomic. The constant give-and-take between
me versus we extends down to the tiniest and most
primal elements of life. Short biochemical sequences
may want to replicate themselves ad infinitum, their
neighboring sequences be damned; yet genes get together
under the aegis of cells and reproduce in orderly
fashion as genomes, as collectives of sequences,
setting aside some of their immediate selfish urges
for the sake of long-term genomic survival. Cells
further collude as organs, and organs pool their
talents and become bodies. The conflict between being
well behaved, being good, not gulping down more than
your share, and being selfish enough to get your fair
share, “is eternal and encompasses virtually all species
on earth,” he writes, and it likely occurs on any other
planet that supports life, too, “because it is predicted
at such a fundamental level by evolutionary theory.”
How do higher patterns of cooperative behavior emerge
from aggregates of small, selfish units? With carrots,
sticks and ceaseless surveillance. In the human body,
for example, nascent tumor cells arise on a shockingly
regular basis, each determined to replicate without
bound; again and again, immune cells attack the
malignancies, destroying the outlaw cells and themselves
in the process. The larger body survives to breed, and
hence spawn a legacy far sturdier than any tumor mass
could manage.

As with our bodies, so with our behaviors. Wilson
explores the many fascinating ways in which humans
are the consummate group-thinking, team-playing animal.
The way we point things out to one another, for example,
is unique among primates. “Apes raised with people
learn to point for things that they want but never
point to call the attention of their human caretakers
to objects of mutual interest,” Wilson writes, “something
that human infants start doing around their first birthday.”
The eyes of other apes are dark across their entire span
and thus are hard to follow, but the contrast between
the white sclera and colored iris of the human eye makes
it difficult for people to conceal the direction in which
they are looking. In the interdependent, egalitarian
context of the tribe, the ancestral human setting,
Wilson says, “it becomes advantageous for members
of the team to share information, turning the eyes
into organs of communication in addition to organs
of vision.” Humans are equipped with all the
dispositional tools needed to establish and maintain
order in the commons. Studies have revealed a deep
capacity for empathy, a willingness to trust others
and become instant best friends; and an equally
strong urge to punish cheaters, to exact revenge
against those who buck group rules for private gain.

Of course, even as humans bond together in groups
and behave with impressive civility toward their
neighbors, they are capable of treating those outside
the group with ruthless savagery. Wilson is not naïve,
and he recognizes the ease with which humans fall into
an us-versus-them mind-set. Yet he is a self-described
optimist, and he believes that the golden circles
of we-ness, the conditions that encourage entities
at every stratum of life to stop competing and instead
pool their labors into a communally acting mega-entity,
can be expanded outward like ripples on a pond until
they encompass all of us — that the entire human race
can evolve the culturally primed if not genetically
settled incentive to see our futures for what they are,
inexorably linked on the lone blue planet we share.

Toward the end of the book he offers a series of
evolutionarily informed suggestions on how we might
help widen the geometry of good will, beginning with
the italicized, boldface pronouncement that “we are
not fated by our genes to engage in violent conflict.”
Our bloody past does not foretell an inevitably bloody
future, and violent behaviors that make grim sense
in one context can become maladaptive in another.
“The Vikings of Iceland were among the fiercest people
on earth, and now they are the most peaceful,” he
observes. “In principle, it is possible to completely
eliminate violent conflict by eliminating its preferred
‘habitat.’ ” For their universal appeal and basal power
to harmonize a crowd, he recommends more music and
dancing and asks, “Could we establish world peace if
everyone at the United Nations showed up in leotards?”
He also believes that the world’s religions should
be tapped for their “wisdom.” This is a fine idea
in the abstract, but given current events and the
fissuring of the world along so many theo-sectarian
lines, I wish we could forgo the sermon and just
strike up the band.

Natalie Angier is a science columnist for The Times.
Her latest book, “The Canon: A Whirligig Tour Through
the Beautiful Basics of Science,” will be published in May.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

15) Sweet Little Lies
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Op-Ed Columnist
April 9, 2007
http://select.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/opinion/09krugman.html?hp

Four years into a war fought to eliminate a nonexistent
threat, we all have renewed appreciation for the power
of the Big Lie: people tend to believe false official
claims about big issues, because they can’t picture their
leaders being dishonest about such things.

But there’s another political lesson I don’t think has
sunk in: the power of the Little Lie — the small accusation
invented out of thin air, followed by another, and another,
and another. Little Lies aren’t meant to have staying power.
Instead, they create a sort of background hum, a sense that
the person facing all these accusations must have done
something wrong.

For a long time, basically from 9/11 until the last remnants
of President Bush’s credibility drowned in New Orleans,
the Bush administration was able to go big on its deceptions.
Most people found it inconceivable that an American president
would, for example, assert without evidence that Saddam and
Al Qaeda were allies. Mr. Bush won the 2004 election because
a quorum of voters still couldn’t believe he would grossly
mislead them on matters of national security.

Before 9/11, however, the right-wing noise machine mainly
relied on little lies. And now it has returned to its roots.

The Clinton years were a parade of fake scandals: Whitewater,
Troopergate, Travelgate, Filegate, Christmas-card-gate.
At the end, there were false claims that Clinton staff
members trashed the White House on their way out.

Each pseudoscandal got headlines, air time and finger-wagging
from the talking heads. The eventual discovery in each
case that there was no there there, if reported at all,
received far less attention. The effect was to make
an administration that was, in fact, pretty honest and
well run — especially compared with its successor —
seem mired in scandal.

Even in the post-9/11 environment, little lies never
went away. In particular, promoting little lies seems
to have been one of the main things U.S. attorneys,
as loyal Bushies, were expected to do. For example,
David Iglesias, the U.S. Attorney in New Mexico,
appears to have been fired because he wouldn’t bring
unwarranted charges of voter fraud.

There’s a lot of talk now about a case in Wisconsin,
where the Bush-appointed U.S. attorney prosecuted the
state’s purchasing supervisor over charges that a court
recently dismissed after just 26 minutes of oral
testimony, with one judge calling the evidence “beyond
thin.” But by then the accusations had done their job:
the unjustly accused official had served almost four
months in prison, and the case figured prominently
in attack ads alleging corruption in the Democratic
governor’s administration.

This is the context in which you need to see the wild
swings Republicans have been taking at Nancy Pelosi.

First, there were claims that the speaker of the House
had demanded a lavish plane for her trips back to
California. One Republican leader denounced her
“arrogance of extravagance” — then, when it became
clear that the whole story was bogus, admitted that
he had never had any evidence.

Now there’s Ms. Pelosi’s fact-finding trip to Syria,
which Dick Cheney denounced as “bad behavior” — unlike
the visit to Syria by three Republican congressmen
a few days earlier, or Newt Gingrich’s trip to
China when he was speaker.

Ms. Pelosi has responded coolly, dismissing the
administration’s reaction as a “tantrum.” But it’s
more than that: the hysterical reaction to her trip
is part of a political strategy, aided and abetted
by news organizations that give little lies their
time in the sun.

Fox News, which is a partisan operation in all but
name, plays a crucial role in the Little Lie strategy
— which is why there is growing pressure on Democratic
politicians not to do anything, like participating
in Fox-hosted debates, that helps Fox impersonate
a legitimate news organization.

But Fox has had plenty of help. Even Time’s Joe Klein,
a media insider if anyone is, wrote of the Pelosi trip
that “the media coverage of this on CNN and elsewhere
has been abysmal.” For example, CNN ran a segment about
Ms. Pelosi’s trip titled “Talking to Terrorists.”

The G.O.P.’s reversion to the Little Lie technique
is a symptom of political weakness, of a party reduced
to trivial smears because it has nothing else to offer.
But the technique will remain effective — and the U.S.
political scene will remain ugly — as long as many
people in the news media keep playing along.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

16) 6-Year-Olds Under Arrest
By BOB HERBERT
Op-Ed Columnist
Avon Park, Fla.
April 9, 2007
http://select.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/opinion/09herbert.html?hp

When 6-year-old Desre’e Watson threw a tantrum in her
kindergarten class a couple of weeks ago she could not
have known that the full force of the law would be
brought down on her and that she would be carted off
by the police as a felon.

But that’s what happened in this small, backward city
in central Florida. According to the authorities,
there were no other options.

“The student became violent,” said Frank Mercurio,
the no-nonsense chief of the Avon Park police.
“She was yelling, screaming — just being
uncontrollable. Defiant.”

“But she was 6,” I said.

The chief’s reply came faster than a speeding bullet:
“Do you think this is the first 6-year-old we’ve
arrested?”

The child’s tantrum occurred on the morning of March 28
at the Avon Elementary School. According to the police
report, “Watson was upset and crying and wailing and
would not leave the classroom to let them study, causing
a disruption of the normal class activities.”

After a few minutes, Desre’e was, in fact, taken to
another room. She was “isolated,” the chief said.
But she would not calm down. She flailed away at the
teachers who tried to control her. She pulled one
woman’s hair. She was kicking.

I asked the chief if anyone had been hurt. “Yes,”
he said. At least one woman reported “some redness.”

After 20 minutes of this “uncontrollable” behavior,
the police were called in. At the sight of the two
officers, Chief Mercurio said, Desre’e “tried to
take flight.”

She went under a table. One of the police officers
went after her. Each time the officer tried to grab
her to drag her out, Desre’e would pull her legs
away, the chief said.

Ultimately the child was no match for Avon Park’s
finest. The cops pulled her from under the table
and handcuffed her. The officers were not fooling
around. In the eyes of the cops the 6-year-old was
a criminal, and in Avon Park she would be treated
like any other felon.

There was a problem, though. The handcuffs were
not manufactured with kindergarten kids in mind.
The chief explained: “You can’t handcuff them on
their wrists because their wrists are too small,
so you have to handcuff them up by their biceps.”

As I sat listening to Chief Mercurio in a spotless,
air-conditioned conference room at the Avon Park
police headquarters, I had the feeling that I had
somehow stumbled into the middle of a skit on
“Saturday Night Live.” The chief seemed like the
most reasonable of men, but what was coming out
of his mouth was madness.

He handed me a copy of the police report: black
female. Six years old. Thin build. Dark complexion.

Desre’e was put in the back of a patrol car and
driven to the police station. “Then,” said Chief
Mercurio, “she was transported to central booking,
which is the county jail.”

The child was fingerprinted and a mug shot was taken.
“Those are the normal procedures for anyone who
is arrested,” the chief said.

Desre’e was charged with battery on a school official,
which is a felony, and two misdemeanors: disruption
of a school function and resisting a law enforcement
officer. After a brief stay at the county jail,
she was released to the custody of her mother.

The arrest of this child, who should have been placed
in the care of competent, comforting professionals
rather than being hauled off to jail, is part of
an outlandish trend of criminalizing very young
children that has spread to many school districts
and law enforcement agencies across the country.

A highly disproportionate number of those youngsters,
like Desre’e, are black. In Baltimore last month,
the police arrested, handcuffed and hauled away
a 7-year-old black boy for allegedly riding a dirt
bike on the sidewalk. The youngster was released
and the mayor, Sheila Dixon, apologized for the
incident, saying the arrest was inappropriate.

Last spring a number of civil rights organizations
collaborated on a study of disciplinary practices
in Florida schools and concluded that many of them,
“like many districts in other states, have turned
away from traditional education-based disciplinary
methods — such as counseling, after-school detention,
or extra homework assignments — and are looking
to the legal system to handle even the most minor
transgressions.”

Once you adopt the mindset that ordinary childhood
misbehavior is criminal behavior, it’s easy to start
seeing young children as somehow monstrous.

“Believe me when I tell you,” said Chief Mercurio,
“a 6-year-old can inflict injury to you just
as much as any other person.”

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

17) Guantánamo Detainees Stage Hunger Strike
By TIM GOLDEN
April 9, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/us/09hunger.html

A long-term hunger strike has broken out at the American
detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, with more than
a dozen prisoners subjecting themselves to daily force-
feeding to protest their treatment, military officials
and lawyers for the detainees say.

Lawyers for several hunger strikers said their clients’
actions were driven by harsh conditions in a new maximum
security complex. About 160 of the roughly 385 Guantánamo
detainees have been moved to the complex since December.

Thirteen detainees are now on hunger strikes, the largest
number to endure the force-feeding regimen on an extended
basis since early 2006, when the military broke a long-
running strike with a new policy of strapping prisoners
into restraint chairs while they are fed by plastic
tubes inserted through their nostrils.

The hunger strikers are now monitored so closely that
they have virtually no chance to starve themselves.
Yet their persistence underscores how the struggle
between detainees and guards at Guantánamo has
continued even as the military has tightened its
control in the past year.

“We don’t have any rights here, even after your Supreme
Court said we had rights,” one hunger striker, Majid
al-Joudi, told a military doctor, according to medical
records released recently under a federal court order.
“If the policy does not change, you will see a big
increase in fasting.”

A military spokesman at Guantánamo, Cmdr. Robert Durand
of the Navy, played down the significance of the current
strike, calling the prisoners’ complaints “propaganda.”

But the protests come as criticism of Guantánamo
continues to rise in the United States and abroad. Last
week, after the Supreme Court denied a new appeal
on behalf of the detainees, the head of the International
Committee of the Red Cross delivered a rare public
reprimand to the Bush administration, saying the
prisoners’ ability to contest their detention was
inadequate.

Newly released Pentagon documents show that during
earlier hunger strikes, before the use of the restraint
chairs, some detainees lost more than 30 pounds in
a matter of weeks. By comparison, the current hunger
strike — in which 12 of the 13 detainees were being
force-fed as of Friday — seems almost symbolic.

For instance, the medical records for Mr. Joudi,
a 36-year-old Saudi, showed that when he was hospitalized
on Feb. 10, he had been fasting for 31 days and had
lost more than 15 percent of his body weight.

By the time he was transferred a few days later to
a “feeding block” where more serious hunger strikers
are segregated from other prisoners, his condition
had stabilized and his weight was nearly back to an
ideal level for a man his size. (His exact weight
gain was not recorded.) Mr. Joudi was subsequently
flown home and turned over to the Saudi authorities,
his lawyer said.

Lawyers for several detainees held in the new maximum
security complex, known as Camp 6, compared it to
“supermax” prisons in the United States. The major
differences, they said, are that the detainees have
limited reading material and no television, and only
10 of the Guantánamo prisoners have been charged.

The Camp 6 inmates are generally locked in their
8-foot-by-10-foot cells for at least 22 hours a day,
emerging only to exercise in small wire cages and
to shower. Besides those times, they can talk with
other prisoners only by shouting through food slots
in the steel doors of their cells.

“My wish is to die,” one reported hunger striker
in the camp, Adnan Farhan Abdullatif, a 27-year old
Yemeni, told his lawyer on Feb. 27, according
to recently declassified notes of the meeting.
“We are living in a dying situation.”

Commander Durand, the Guantánamo spokesman, dismissed
such accounts as part of an effort by the prisoners
and their lawyers to discredit the detention mission.
He described the new unit as much more comfortable
than the detainees’ previous quarters, and denied
that they suffered any greater sense of isolation
in the new cell blocks.

“This was designed to improve living conditions,”
Commander Durand said, “and we think it has.”

Camp 6 was originally designed as a modern, medium-
security prison complex for up to 200 inmates, with
common areas where they could gather for meals and
a large fenced athletic field where they could jog
or play soccer outside the high concrete walls.

But after a riot last May and the suicides of three
prisoners in June, the unit was retrofitted before
opening to limit the detainees’ freedom and reduce
the risk that they might hurt themselves or attack
guards, military officials said.

As Camp 6 was opening, senior officials expressed
concern about how prisoners would react to its greater
isolation. Most had been held in makeshift blocks
of wire-mesh cells that — while often hot, noisy and
lacking privacy — allowed them to communicate easily,
pray together and even pass written messages.

Guantánamo’s other maximum-security unit, Camp 5,
has cells that face each other across a short hallway,
allowing the roughly 100 detainees there to converse
fairly easily. In Camp 6, the prisoners can see one
another from their cells only when one of them is being
moved. At other times, they look out on the stainless-
steel picnic tables in the common areas they are not
allowed to use.

Lawyers for several Camp 6 detainees said their clients
were despondent about the move even though, as military
officials note, the new cells are 27 square feet larger
than the old ones and have air-conditioning, nicer toilets
and sinks, and a small desk anchored to the wall.

“They’re just sitting on a powder keg down there,” said
one lawyer, Sabin Willett, who, like others, described
growing desperation among the prisoners. “You’re going
to have an insane asylum.”

Lawyers who visited Guantánamo recently said the detainees
reported a higher number of hunger strikers than had
the military — perhaps 40 or more. Military officials said
there were sometimes “stealth hunger strikers,” who pretend
to eat or surreptitiously vomit after eating, but they
dismissed the detainees’ estimates as exaggerations.

Because reporters are prevented from speaking with detainees
or visiting most of their cell blocks, it is difficult
to verify the conflicting accounts.

Hunger strikes have been part of life at Guantánamo
almost since the detention center opened in January 2002.

They reached a peak in September 2005, when more than
130 detainees were classified as hunger strikers,
having refused at least nine consecutive meals, military
records show. As the strikes went on, some detainees
being force-fed continued to lose weight by vomiting
or siphoning their stomachs with the feeding tubes.
But by early February 2006, shortly after the military
began using restraint chairs during the forced feedings,
the number of hunger strikers plunged to three.

The number rose again sharply but briefly last May,
reaching 86 after three detainees attempted suicide
and a riot broke out as the guards searched for contraband.
Yet even then, no more than seven strikers were forced
into the restraint chair regimen.

Three detainees who had been hunger strikers hung
themselves on June 10. After July, no more than three
detainees subjected themselves to extended forced feeding.

That number began to grow again as detainees were
moved into Camp 6 in December. By mid-March, the
number of hunger strikers reached 17. For the first
time, as many as 15 detainees continued with the
strikes despite being force-fed in the restraint
chairs.

Military officials have described the restraint chair
regimen as unpleasant but necessary. They originally
said prisoners needed to be restrained while digesting,
so they could not purge what they were fed.

Now, the rationale has changed. The restraints are
generally applied “for safety of the detainee and
medical staff,” records show, and they are kept on
for as little as 15 minutes at a time, rather than
the two hours commonly used before. Afterward, the
prisoners are moved to a “dry cell” and monitored
to make sure they do not vomit.

Even so, some detainees describe the experience as
painful, even gruesome.

One Sudanese detainee, Sami al-Hajj, a 38-year-old
former cameraman for Al Jazeera, described feeling
at one point that he could not bear the tube for another
instant. “I said I would begin to scream unless they
took it out,” he wrote in a recent diary entry given
to his lawyer. “They finally did.”

Stephen H. Oleskey, who represents Saber Lahmar, an
Algerian religious scholar whom military officials
accused of propagating a religious legal ruling that
was linked to the suicides, said of his client: “The
man has been in segregation — virtual isolation —
for over nine months. Physically and emotionally,
he’s collapsing. We think this punishment does
exceed what the law allows, and that he won’t
survive.”

Military officials said Mr. Lahmar and other detainees
had received adequate medical attention.

Margot Williams and William Glaberson contributed reporting.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

18) Army Is Cracking Down on Deserters
By PAUL von ZIELBAUER
April 9, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/us/09awol.html?ref=us

Army prosecutions of desertion and other unauthorized
absences have risen sharply in the last four years,
resulting in thousands more negative discharges and
prison time for both junior soldiers and combat-tested
veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Army
records show.

The increased prosecutions are meant to serve as a
deterrent to a growing number of soldiers who are
ambivalent about heading — or heading back — to Iraq
and may be looking for a way out, several Army lawyers
said in interviews. Using courts-martial for these
violations, which before 2002 were treated mostly
as unpunished nuisances, is a sign that active-duty
forces are being stretched to their limits, military
lawyers and mental health experts said.

“They are scraping to get people to go back, and people
are worn out,” said Dr. Thomas Grieger, a senior Navy
psychiatrist. Though there are no current studies to
show how combat stress affects desertion rates, Dr. Grieger
cited several examples of soldiers absconding or refusing
to return to Iraq because of psychiatric reasons brought
on by wartime deployments.

At an Army base in Alaska last year, for example, “there
was one guy who literally chopped off his trigger finger
with an axe to prevent his deployment,” Dr. Grieger said
in an interview.

The Army prosecuted desertion far less often in the late
1990s, when desertions were more frequent, than it does
now, when there are comparatively fewer.

From 2002 through 2006, the average annual rate of Army
prosecutions of desertion tripled compared with the five-
year period from 1997 to 2001, to roughly 6 percent
of deserters, from 2 percent, Army data shows.

Between these two five-year spans — one prewar and one
during wartime — prosecutions for similar crimes,
like absence without leave or failing to appear for
unit missions, have more than doubled, to an average
of 390 per year from an average of 180 per year,
Army data shows.

In total, the Army since 2002 has court-martialed
twice as many soldiers for desertion and other unauthorized
absences as it did on average each year between 1997
and 2001. Deserters are soldiers who leave a post
or fail to show up for an assignment with the intent
to stay away. Soldiers considered absent without leave,
or AWOL, which presumes they plan to return, are classified
as deserters and dropped from a unit’s rolls after 30 days.

Most soldiers who return from unauthorized absences
are punished and discharged. Few return to regular duty.

Officers said the crackdown reflected an awareness by
top Army and Defense Department officials that desertions,
which occurred among more than 1 percent of the active-duty
force in 2000 for the first time since the post-Vietnam era,
were in a sustained upswing again after ebbing in 2003,
the first year of the Iraq war.

At the same time, the increase highlights a cycle long
known to Army researchers: as the demand for soldiers
increases during a war, desertions rise and the Army
tends to lower enlistment standards, recruiting more
people with questionable backgrounds who are far more
likely to become deserters.

In the 2006 fiscal year, 3,196 soldiers deserted, the
Army said, a figure that has been climbing since the 2004
fiscal year, when 2,357 soldiers absconded. In the first
quarter of the current fiscal year, which began Oct. 1,
871 soldiers deserted, a rate that, if it stays on pace,
would produce 3,484 desertions for the fiscal year, an
8 percent increase over 2006.

The Army said the desertion rate was within historical
norms, and that the surge in prosecutions, which are
at the discretion of unit commanders, was not a surprise
given the impact that absent soldiers can have during
wartime.

“The nation is at war, and the Army treats the offense
of desertion more seriously,” Maj. Anne D. Edgecomb,
an Army spokeswoman, said. “The Army’s leadership will
take whatever measures they believe are appropriate
if they see a continued upward trend in desertion,
in order to maintain the health of the force.”

Army studies and interviews also suggest a link between
the rising rate of desertions and the expanding use
of moral waivers to recruit people with poor academic
records and low-level criminal convictions. At least
1 in 10 deserters surveyed after returning to the Army
from 2002 to mid-2004 required a waiver to enter the
service, a report by the Army Research Institute found.

“We’re enlisting more dropouts, people with more law
violations, lower test scores, more moral issues,”
said a senior noncommissioned officer involved in
Army personnel and recruiting. “We’re really scraping
the bottom of the barrel trying to get people to join.”
(Army officials agreed to discuss the issue on the
condition that they not be quoted by name.)

The officer said the Army National Guard last week
authorized 34 states and Guam to enlist the lowest-
ranking group of eligible recruits, those who scored
between 16 and 30 on the armed services aptitude test.
Federal law bars recruits who scored lower than
16 from enlisting.

Desertions, while a chronic problem for the Army,
are nowhere near as common as they were at the height
of the Vietnam War. From 1968 to 1971, for instance,
about 5 percent of enlisted men deserted.

But the rate of desertion today, after four years
of fighting two ground wars, is “being taken much more
seriously because we were losing so many soldiers out
of the Army that there was a recognized need to attack
the problem from a different way,” said an Army criminal
defense lawyer.

In interviews, the lawyer and two other Army lawyers
each traced the spike in prosecutions to a policy
change at the beginning of 2002 that required
commanders to welcome back soldiers who deserted
or went AWOL.

Before that, most deserters, who are often young,
undistinguished soldiers who have fallen out of favor
with their sergeants, were given administrative
separations and sent home with other-than-honorable
discharges.

The new policy, ordered by the secretary of the army,
effectively eliminated the incentive among squad
sergeants to urge returning AWOL soldiers to stay
away for at least 30 days, when they would be
classified as deserters under the old rules and
dropped from the roll.

But some unit commanders, wary of scrutiny from
their superiors, go out of their way to improperly
keep deserted soldiers on their rosters, and on
the Army’s payroll, two officers said in interviews.
To counter that, the Army adopted a new policy
in January 2005 requiring commanders to formally
report absent soldiers within 48 hours.

Such problems are costly. From October 2000 to
February 2002, the Army improperly paid more than
$6.6 million to 7,544 soldiers who had deserted
or were otherwise absent, according to a July 2006
report by the Government Accountability Office.

Most deserters list dissatisfaction with Army
life or family problems as primary reasons for
their absence, and most go AWOL in the United
States. But since 2003, 109 soldiers have been
convicted of going AWOL or deserting war zones
in Iraq or Afghanistan, usually during their
scheduled two-week leaves in the United States,
Army officials said.

With the Iraq war in its fifth year, a new subset
of deserter is emerging, military doctors and
lawyers said: accomplished soldiers who abscond
reluctantly, as a result of severe emotional
trauma from their battle experiences.

James, a 26-year-old paratrooper twice deployed
to Iraq and Afghanistan, went AWOL in July after
being reassigned to Fort Bliss, Tex., an Army
post in the mountainous high-desert region near
El Paso.

“The places I was in in Iraq and Afghanistan look
exactly like Fort Bliss,” said James, who agreed
to talk about his case on the condition that his
last name not be printed. “It starts messing with
your head — ‘I’m really back there.’ ”

In December, he and another deserter, Ronnie, 28,
who also asked that his last name not be used,
tried to surrender to the authorities at Fort
Bliss. A staff sergeant told them not to bother,
James said.

James and Ronnie, who both have five years of service,
suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder and abuse
alcohol to self-medicate, said Dr. David M. Walker,
a former Air Force psychiatrist who has examined
both men.

With help from lawyers, James and Ronnie returned
to Fort Bliss on Tuesday. They were charged with
desertion and face courts-martial and possibly
a few months in a military brig.

“If I could stay in the military, get help, that’s
what I want,” said Ronnie, who completed an 18-month
combat tour in Kirkuk, Iraq, with the 25th Infantry
Division in 2004.

The Army said combat-related stress had not caused
many soldiers to desert.

Major Edgecomb, the spokeswoman, said more than
80 percent of the past year’s deserters had been
soldiers for less than three years, and could not
have been deployed more than once.

Morten G. Ender, a sociologist at the United States
Military Academy at West Point, said soldiers’
decisions to go AWOL or desert might come in response
to a family crisis — a threat by a spouse to leave
if they deploy again, for instance, or a child-
custody battle.

“It’s not just that they don’t want to be in a war
zone anymore,” Dr. Ender said. “We saw that a lot
during Vietnam, and we see that a lot in the military now.”

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

19) CLOSE CONTACT
To Woo Afghan Locals,
U.S. Troops Settle In
Tactic Wins Friends,
Isolates Insurgents,
But Boosts Casualties
By MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS
April 9, 2007; Page A1
WALL STREET JOURNAL
[VIA Email from: Walter Lippmann
walterlx@earthlink.net ...bw]

WAYGAL, Afghanistan -- One sunny morning last month, a group of
bearded men stood beside the gurgling Waygal River and stared as a
helicopter loaded with heavily armed Americans dropped out of the
sky and into their cornfield. The moment the rear ramp opened, the
soldiers ran for cover behind stone terraces and leafless trees.

They had reason to be wary. These mountains are notorious for
sheltering Taliban and al Qaeda fighters, and the soldiers were the
first Americans to set foot in Waygal since the Afghan war began in
2001.

But instead of a hail of bullets, the soldiers got an invitation to
dinner. When First Lt. Eric Malmstrom, a fresh-faced University of
Pennsylvania graduate, approached the hirsute reception committee,
village leader Ghulam Sakhi's most pressing question was, "Why didn't
you come sooner?"

A year ago, U.S. commanders here would have been reluctant to insert
a small force of infantrymen into a remote village. But, along the
Pech River and tributaries such as the Waygal, one 750-man U.S. Army
battalion is trying a risky, grueling way to isolate the insurgents
and win the support of the villagers. Instead of operating out of
safe rear bases and commuting to the war, for the past year the
soldiers of the First Battalion, 32nd Infantry Regiment have lived on
the battlefield, in a series of small, rudimentary encampments
situated among the disputed villages themselves.

It's an intimate style of warfare and, for the Americans, a brutal
one. They go weeks without showers or decent food. They live every
day exposed to enemy fire, and it has cost them dearly. Over the past
year, 1-32 has lost 19 men, almost half of the deaths in the entire
5,000-man brigade.

The Americans and their Afghan National Army allies live among the
people on the valley floor, while the insurgents -- Taliban, al Qaeda
and other fighters of various stripes -- are up in the steep, rocky
ridges. When the insurgents attack, they fire down on American
soldiers and Afghan civilians alike. "The semiotics of it are great,"
says Lt. Col. Chris Cavoli, commander of 1-32, a unit of the 10th
Mountain Division. "You can't buy press like that. The way the fight
is constructed is to deliver one message: We're here to protect you,
and the bad guys are here to ruin your lives."

The battalion's progress comes amid warnings that elsewhere in
Afghanistan, the Taliban are resurgent and public faith is sagging in
the government of President Hamid Karzai. The United Nations
secretary general reported last month that the insurgents are
"emboldened by their strategic successes, rather than disheartened by
tactical failures." A February study by the Center for Strategic and
International Studies, a Washington think tank, said the situation in
Afghanistan is "both more perilous and more complex" than at any
other time since the U.S.-led coalition toppled the Taliban regime
after Sept. 11, 2001.

Critics say the setbacks have come in part because the U.S., distracted
by the war in Iraq, has too little manpower in Afghanistan to engage in
community policing.

Striking Results

Here, however, the results are striking. A year ago, the Pech Valley,
the main artery through the area, was a gantlet of roadside bombings
and rocket-propelled grenade fire. Lately there have been just two or
three roadside bombs a month, and the locals frequently report them
to Afghan or U.S. troops before they explode.

A year ago, it took five hours to drive the 19 miles from Asadabad,
the nearest big town, to Nangalam, site of the nearest sizable U.S.
military base. The road was little more than a goat trail. Now a
U.S.-funded, $7.5 million project is turning it into a two-lane,
paved road connecting the Pech Valley to, in effect, the rest of the
world.

Col. Cavoli, a 42-year-old Princeton graduate who spent much of his
youth in Italy, argues that the key to defeating the insurgents is
having a "persistent presence" among the people, not just "persistent
raiding." Placing American and Afghan troops around villages creates
a security bubble, he says, that allows the U.S. to pour money into
economic-development projects.

"The basic idea is to kill the enemy to convince the people that you
can and will protect them," says the colonel, a compact man with
receding hair and an easy grin. "Then in the breathing space created,
you've got to do something to connect the people to the government."

The road is central to Col. Cavoli's strategy: It demonstrates the
goodwill of the American and Afghan governments by giving the
residents a commercial link they desperately need. Already, a hotel
is under construction in Nangalam and gas stations are appearing
along the river. Once the hard surface is in place, it will be more
difficult for insurgents to plant roadside bombs.

The construction provides jobs to hundreds of local men who might
otherwise be tempted to join the insurgency. And the road lures the
insurgents out of the mountains in a way that, Army officers argue,
will inevitably alienate them further from the population. The road
is popular with the locals; attacking it is not. The Americans now
plan more roads, including a $7.5 million stretch to Waygal, the
village where Lt. Malmstrom and his men landed recently.

In December, the Army and Marine Corps issued a new counterinsurgency
doctrine that closely hews to Col. Cavoli's approach, arguing that
killing the enemy is less important than building ties to the local
populace -- and to do that, American troops may have to take on more
risk themselves. "If military forces remain in their compounds, they
lose touch with the people, appear to be running scared and cede the
initiative to the insurgents," the new manual says.

Col. Cavoli is "on the cutting edge of a new approach to
counterinsurgency," says Col. John Nicholson, commander of the 3rd
Brigade Combat Team. Col. Nicholson's brigade, which includes 1-32,
has tripled the number of outposts it inherited from the units it
replaced last year. But 1-32 did so in the most hostile part of the
brigade's turf. "There is no better case study of modern
counterinsurgency than the recent performance" of Col. Cavoli's men,
Col. Nicholson says.

Over the past couple of months, the Army has tried to put the tactic
to work in Iraq, as part of its desperate effort to quell insurgency
and sectarian violence in Baghdad. U.S. commanders there are setting
up neighborhood security stations, manned by Americans and Iraqis,
but it is still too early to see the results. Applying the technique
in Iraq is complicated because much of the mayhem is between one
Iraqi faction and another. U.S. troops are caught in the middle,
supporting an Iraqi government that many Sunni Muslims suspect is the
tool of their Shiite Muslim rivals.

Even replicating the battalion's progress elsewhere in Afghanistan
would be difficult. Col. Cavoli's 750 men have spent a year fighting
for public acceptance along just a few dozen miles of river valleys.
The military's counterinsurgency doctrine specifies that, at a
minimum, one soldier is required for every 50 residents. Although the
insurgency is concentrated in the east and south, applying the
formula to the entire country would require more than 600,000 troops,
a force a dozen times the size of the international coalition now in
Afghanistan.

Nonetheless, the Pentagon has taken notice of 1-32's gains, and Col.
Cavoli's next posting will be to teach counterinsurgency techniques
to officers from other NATO nations, which make up about half of the
coalition in Afghanistan.

For 1-32, the tactic developed almost by accident. The battalion
arrived in Afghanistan in early 2006, and it soon became apparent to
Col. Cavoli that the Pech Valley would have to be the focus of his
efforts.

The Marines they replaced had fought out of two large bases, in
Asadabad, where the Pech empties into another river, and upstream
near Nangalam. When the Marines attacked, the insurgents would fade
away, only to return to the valley as soon as the Americans went back
to their bases, according to Col. Cavoli.

Last April, he ordered one of his company commanders to fight his way
west and set up temporary outposts on the Pech between Asadabad and
Nangalam. At Patrol Base California, one of several along the river,
soldiers lived in the open -- rain, snow or sun -- and slept next to
their Humvees, using large, dirt-filled barriers to shield them from
insurgent attacks. They did without showers and ate packaged meals.

It was supposed to be a short-term fix. Days stretched into weeks and
weeks into months, however, as Col. Cavoli realized that his best
hope of separating the insurgents from the locals was to keep his men
in place. These days they have cots and have built themselves
cramped, sandbag bunkers with plywood roofs. But when it rains, their
hooches run deep with mud or water, and the small weight-lifting pit
turns into a café-au-lait pool.

Fending for Themselves

The men still clean themselves with baby wipes and use half of a
55-gallon drum as a toilet. Every couple of days they get trays of
hot food trucked in, but they frequently fend for themselves,
grilling pizzas, toasting biscuits or deep-frying chicken patties
over an open fire. Unlike at the major bases, there is no Internet or
phone service, no refuge from the war.

"I live like an animal here," says Spc. Marcus Whited, a 26-year-old
from Wichita, Kan., manning a machine gun atop a Humvee at the camp
entrance. "I've never in my life smelled odors like this."

When the soldiers got word in January that their yearlong combat tour
would be extended by four months, the colonel gave orders that each
platoon rotate to Asadabad every two weeks for showers and a couple
of days of rest.

"It's a hell of a thing to ask men to live like that day after day
after day," Col. Cavoli says. But it's no accident; the colonel
doesn't want his men living visibly better than their Afghan
neighbors.

The men at Patrol Base California have been in some 60 firefights.
Usually, insurgents move out of the mountains to stony redoubts on
the ridges overlooking the U.S. positions, then open fire with
machine guns, rifles and rocket-propelled grenades. The Americans,
and the Afghan soldiers who share their encampments, return fire with
machine guns, automatic grenade launchers, mortars and missiles.
Howitzers located in big bases miles away rain shells down on the
mountaintops until the insurgents die or withdraw.

The proximity of the soldiers to the local residents has indeed led
to the intimacy that Col. Cavoli seeks. First Lt. Michael Harrison, a
platoon leader in the battalion's Dog Company, studied law and
nuclear engineering at West Point, where he was a minor troublemaker,
doing punishment marches for such offenses as keeping a rice cooker
in his room. But along the Pech River, the 25-year-old has a fan club
of neighborhood urchins -- a counterweight to insurgent propaganda
that, the military says, claims the Americans are here to convert
Muslims to Christianity and eat their children.

When the lieutenant approaches Patrol Base California, he lowers the
bullet-proof window on his Humvee, reaches out and slaps high-fives
with the children. "Michael!" they shout as he passes, mimicking his
two-finger peace sign.

"Whassup, Hussein? Haircut!" Lt. Harrison says to a close-shaved
orphan boy in a dirty-white jersey and loose trousers. He gives a set
of baby bottles to a boy whose sister died after giving birth.

When he isn't patrolling, the lieutenant spends much of his time
sounding out the locals, listening to their troubles and trying to
arrange solutions. One recent day he sat on a bit of carpet, sipping
sweet yellow tea with a group of police auxiliary officers outside
their sandbagged station. Ras Mohamed, a 34-year-old police chief,
pointed across the Pech to a small brown-brick house, halfway up the
valley wall.

"Last year the enemy was coming all the way down there and shooting
at jingle trucks," he said, referring to the decorated freight trucks
seen everywhere in Afghanistan. "Now they don't dare."

Authority of Elders

Another day Lt. Harrison chatted up village elders in a small police
bunker along the river. The Afghans talked about how they used to set
up roadblocks along the valley and ambush Russian tanks with
rocket-propelled grenades during the 10-year war with the Soviet
Union.

"We never talked to them; we just shot at them," said Mohammad
Shareen, a 45-year-old elder wearing a black watch cap with a Nike
swoosh.

The soldiers intentionally reinforce the authority of elders, who
traditionally have the power to expel or ostracize miscreants and can
serve as a bulwark against younger, hotter heads. The U.S. required
the Afghan road contractor to hire at least 450 workers from the Pech
Valley itself, but left it to the elders to decide who got what
positions.

Lt. Harrison "never does anything without asking the elders first,"
said Mir Azfal, a 25-year-old police auxiliary officer.

The Americans have provided other benefits as well, installing small
hydropower generators along the Pech River, handing out school
supplies for children and setting up makeshift clinics for the ill.

"The enemy is more isolated from the people than last year," says
35-year-old Lt. Col. M. Farid Ahmadi, who commands the 400-man Afghan
National Army battalion that lives and fights alongside 1-32. "When
we separate the...evildoers from the people, it's easy to kill,
capture or destroy them. It's difficult to do when the enemy is among
the people."

Some areas, particularly south of the Pech River, have proved
resistant to Col. Cavoli's approaches, however. Elders in the village
of Matin initially rejected a U.S. offer to build a bridge connecting
them with the new road -- a sign, the soldiers thought, of their ties
to the insurgency. Recently the elders changed their minds. Still,
Lt. Harrison's night patrols watch for insurgents leaving Matin and
crossing the shallows of the Pech to plant explosives on the valley
road.

Farther south, the Army has found few winnable hearts or minds in the
Korangal Valley, an area ethnically and linguistically distinct from
the northern bank of the Pech. The people of the Korangal have
longtime links to the insurgency, according to the military. The
fighting on the mountaintops in that area has been particularly
bloody over the past year.

"The ones who liked us before like us now," says Pvt. Adam Boguskie,
21, of Spencer County, Ky., his heavy machine gun pointing toward the
snowy ridgeline south of the Pech. "The ones who hated us before hate
us now. It's all about money. If the Taliban had money, the locals
would be bringing them Pepsis up there."

The men of 1-32 are due to go home to Fort Drum, N.Y., in June, some
16 months after they arrived in Afghanistan, and Col. Cavoli has been
worried that the troops who follow will abandon the relationships his
men have spent so much time establishing. Last month his replacement,
Lt. Col. Bill Ostlund of the 173rd Airborne Brigade, paid an advance
visit to Afghanistan, where Col. Cavoli pitched his
up-close-and-personal approach to counterinsurgency.

"It would be easy for me as a commander to put people in [rear bases
at] Asadabad and Jalalabad and spend a year painting rocks," Col.
Cavoli told Col. Ostlund. Pointing to the Pech Valley on a wall map,
he continued: "But the people we're trying to help are up here."


*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

20) Crop Prices Soar,
Pushing Up Cost
Of Food Globally
New Demand for Biofuels
Feeds Inflation Pressure;
China, India Feel Pinch
By PATRICK BARTA
April 9, 2007; Page A1
The Wall Street Journal
[VIA Email from: Walter Lippmann
walterlx@earthlink.net ...bw]

Soaring prices for farm goods, driven in part by demand for
crop-based fuels, are pushing up the price of food world-wide and
unleashing a new source of inflationary pressure.

The rise in food prices is already causing distress among consumers
in some parts of the world -- especially relatively poor nations like
India and China. If the trend gathers momentum, it could contribute
to slower global growth by forcing consumers to spend less on other
items or spurring central banks to fight inflation by raising
interest rates.

Politicians in markets where food costs are a particularly sensitive
matter are moving to counter rising prices before they take a bigger
economic toll or fuel unrest. But it remains unclear whether those
policies will be enough to contain the current pressures, or whether
a longer-term bout of food-price inflation -- similar in ways to the
recent climb in prices for oil and other commodities -- is in the
offing.

One of the chief causes of food-price inflation is new demand for
ethanol and biodiesel, which can be made from corn, palm oil, sugar
and other crops. That demand has driven up the price of those
commodities, leading to higher costs for producers of everything from
beef to eggs to soft drinks. In some cases, producers are passing the
costs along to consumers. Several years of global economic growth --
led by China and India -- is also raising food consumption, further
fanning the inflationary pressures.

Food-price inflation has been climbing -- in some cases sharply -- in
India, China, Europe, and even smaller economies like Turkey, South
Africa and Poland. In Hungary, it is running at more than 13% a year,
compared with less than 3% in 2005. In China, food prices are
climbing at a 6% pace, more than three times the speed of a year ago.
Prices are also up in Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom. They may
even be picking up in Japan, the world's second-largest national
economy, though the signs are tentative since overall prices there
are only just starting to rise after a prolonged economic downturn.

The U.S., too, is seeing some stirrings, with food costs rising 3.1%
in February from the year before -- a rate one percentage point
higher than in mid-2005. Economists say U.S. food prices are expected
to rise faster than the general rate of inflation this year.
Wholesale prices of meat, poultry and eggs have already increased.

If the trend continues, U.S. consumers are likely to see higher
prices at the supermarket for everything from milk to cereal to soda
pop, since corn is used to feed livestock and make high-fructose corn
syrup, a key ingredient in many soft drinks. A spokesman for the
National Chicken Council, a poultry-industry group, recently
testified to a congressional subcommittee that Americans should
expect higher chicken prices because of what the group described as
"the ethanol crisis."

Doomsday predictions of a major food shortage in China and elsewhere
have circulated for years but haven't materialized. And some
economists believe the recent increase in crop demand probably can be
met without severely straining the global economy. They think prices
could come back down over time, especially if some countries that
have more land that could be put under cultivation -- particularly
Brazil -- can greatly increase production. Technological advances,
such as better seed varieties, could also help boost production to
keep up with demand.

In the meantime, higher farm prices aren't bad for everyone. They
could help boost incomes for the rural poor in developing nations,
who have been bypassed by gains in the manufacturing and service
sectors. In some cases, the rising demand for food also reflects the
growing wealth of once-destitute populations around the globe.

So far, higher prices haven't sparked a major rise in overall global
inflation, which remains relatively low and stable by historical
standards. Moreover, food prices are notoriously volatile, and some
of the increases are due to short-term or local factors that could
reverse in time.

But many economists believe the forces causing the current bout of
food inflation will persist, or recur in years ahead. Many countries
are facing shortages of land and water that didn't exist during past
food-price spikes, so they can't easily plant more to ease the
strain.

Researchers at Swiss bank UBS AG note that average food prices in
China have grown faster in the past five years than in the previous
five, as more agricultural land is taken up for factories or
high-rise condominiums. Changes in diets are also exacerbating the
problem, as rising incomes allow the Chinese and consumers in many
other places to eat more.

Some economists contend that China and India appear to be reaching a
point at which nothing short of a bumper crop of key commodities will
be enough to meet local needs and prevent further surges in food
prices. In fact, China and India have achieved historically high
production of some crops in recent years, only to see prices continue
to climb.

Global grain stocks are at their lowest level in 30 years, after
several years of strong global economic growth, and could become even
tighter if farmers divert more crops to make ethanol or other fuels.
By some estimates, about 30% of the U.S. grain harvest is likely to
be devoted to ethanol production by 2008, up from 16% in 2006.

All of this puts the world's central banks in a bind. Although they
have confronted spurts in energy prices, many of them haven't had to
cope with prolonged increases in food prices since the 1970s. Since
then, food-price inflation has remained relatively benign, even as
incomes world-wide have climbed, allowing consumers to beef up their
diets.

In more recent years, central banks have tried to ignore surges in
food prices as long as they didn't get too out of hand, mostly
because they tended to be short-lived. A change in weather, for
example, could quickly turn a food shortage into a glut, sending
prices tumbling.

But a more sustained bout of food-price inflation, if it emerges,
could force banks to keep interest rates higher than they would
otherwise be. India, for one, has increased interest rates several
times over the past year in part to combat food-price inflation.

"In 1972, the last time grain stocks were this low, the story didn't
end well in terms of inflation," says Carl Weinberg, chief economist
at High Frequency Economics in Valhalla, N.Y. In those days,
inflation soared not just because of higher oil costs but also
because of a global jump in food costs, all of which helped trigger a
major U.S. recession and a global slowdown. "Food prices were an
important part of what started [inflation] rolling" in the 1970s, Mr.
Weinberg says.

But since the 1970s, the Federal Reserve and some other central banks
have come to believe that they can avoid raising interest rates in
the face of transitory increases in food and energy prices if they
have established enough credibility as inflation fighters to keep
such price increases from spilling over to the rest of the economy.

Today, the inflation risks may be greatest in developing economies.
In the Philippines, food accounts for 50% of the basket of goods
included in the consumer-price index, an inflation benchmark. In
Thailand, it's about 35%, according to data from Macquarie Bank Ltd.
In the U.S., food makes up only about 15% of the CPI.

In one bustling open-air market in downtown Shanghai, shoppers say
they are paying as much as two times the price they paid last year
for green vegetables, and the cost of meat and vegetable oils have
also soared.

Such blows to the pocketbook "give us more pressure for daily life,"
says Xu Wen, a 53-year-old retiree who was purchasing some rolled
noodles in a small shop last week. Already, she says, she and her
husband are spending almost half their monthly income on food -- a
percentage that continues to increase over time. "We ordinary people
have no way out," she says. "This is something the government needs
to be concerned about."

Government officials are taking pains to show they are addressing the
problem. In December, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao toured a Beijing
supermarket to check up on prices, and China has begun limiting the
construction of corn-based ethanol plants to ensure there is enough
corn for humans and livestock. Chinese officials have even banned new
golf courses on farm land and have been unwinding subsidies they once
paid to grain distributors to sell excess corn overseas.

Still, analysts estimate Chinese stockpiles of surplus corn now stand
at only about 30 million metric tons, down from more than 100 million
tons at the end of the past decade, as demand picks up. (The Chinese
government doesn't provide official estimates of its stockpiles).

That would imply that China only has two to three months of surplus
supply based on current consumption trends, making the country highly
vulnerable if it has a bad crop. Although China remains a net
exporter of corn now, analysts believe it will become a net importer
sometime in the next few years.

Some economists say China will have to take more aggressive steps to
prevent future food problems. These changes could include allowing
the proliferation of large -- but more efficient -- corporate farms
similar to the ones that drove many small growers out of business in
the U.S. in recent decades. Such a push would be extremely difficult
for China because it needs to preserve jobs for the tens of millions
of people who live in rural areas.

Pressures are also building in India. Monika Katyal, a 32-year-old
homemaker, complains that she has had to cut back on purchases of
many luxuries, such as cosmetics, as her family's monthly bill for
groceries has climbed as much as 50% in recent months.

"I came here to do some shopping for myself, but now it doesn't look
like I will be able to do that," she said recently, as she studied
the price on a bottle of ketchup in a New Delhi grocery.
In addition to raising interest rates, Indian officials have also
lifted import duties on corn and barred exports of wheat, to make
sure supplies are available for domestic consumption.

But it isn't clear whether those and other moves will be enough to
make a big difference in the long run. The main problem is that
yields of some crops aren't growing fast enough to keep up with
India's rapidly increasing food demand. India's corn production, for
example, has climbed about 4% a year since 2001, says Amit Sachdev, a
New Delhi-area agriculture-industry analyst, while demand has been
increasing nearly 5.5% a year.

"If I look at the trend line, [it] indicates to me that the
requirements are going up much faster than what you can produce" in
India, he says.

--Lauren Etter, Conor Dougherty, Hanting Tang, Kersten Zhang and
Binny Sabharwal contributed to this article.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

21) Injured troops shipped back into battle
"Salon has uncovered further evidence that the military sent soldiers
with acute post-traumatic stress disorder, severe back injuries and
other serious war wounds back to Iraq."
By Mark Benjamin
April 9, 2007
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/04/09/injured_soldiers/print.html

Apr. 09, 2007 | On March 9, Army Spc. Thomas Smith was ordered to
board a plane from Fort Benning, Ga., to deploy back to Iraq, even
though he was known to be suffering from chronic post-traumatic
stress disorder from a previous tour there. Only weeks prior,
military doctors determined that Smith should not be allowed around
weapons because of his PTSD symptoms, which included bouts of sudden,
extreme anger. Smith's medical records, obtained by Salon, also show
that doctors had "highly recommended" that Smith not be deployed
because of his condition.

But that did not stop Smith's commanders from ordering him to Iraq as
his unit, the 3,900-strong 3rd Brigade of the 3rd Infantry Division,
was rushing to move out as part of President Bush's so-called surge
plan for securing Baghdad.

"I was told to have my bags in at midnight that night," for the
flight, Smith said. "I was sitting there looking at these letters in
my hand from my doctors," he recalled in a telephone interview. In
order to follow the doctors' recommendations, Smith said, "I had to
check myself into the hospital." He avoided the flight by just a few
hours. Smith's condition was serious enough that the doctors there
kept him hospitalized for nearly two weeks.

On March 11, two days after Smith checked himself in, Salon reported
on claims by numerous soldiers from Smith's brigade that commanders
were pressing injured troops to deploy to Iraq. Soldiers at Fort
Benning said that two doctors from the division met with 75 injured
soldiers, including Smith, on Feb. 15, in what the troops said was an
effort to reevaluate -- and downgrade -- their health problems so
that they could be deployed with the rest of the unit. In several
cases, medical records provided to Salon supported those allegations,
showing the soldiers to be healthier, on paper, than they were prior
to that meeting.

It remains unclear how many injured troops from the 3rd Brigade were
deployed last month. But others continue to come forward who, like
Smith, had serious medical problems and narrowly avoided being
shipped back to Iraq. The concern of these soldiers is not only that
they could worsen their injuries by being deployed, but that they
could also be a danger to themselves and the soldiers around them.
Their stories add new evidence to accusations that brigade
commanders, in desperate need of more troops for the surge were
willing to deploy broken soldiers.

Hunter Smart, who until recently was a captain in the 3rd Brigade,
has experience preparing unit status reports. These detailed accounts
showing how many soldiers in a unit are able to deploy to a war zone,
make their way up to decision makers in the Pentagon. Smart says he
believes brigade commanders were manipulating the reports and
pressing injured soldiers to deploy to Iraq. "The unit status report
is a big deal," Hunter explained in a phone interview. "You list by
name and number the number of soldiers that are hurt and non-
deployable," he said. "There was a concerted effort to keep those
numbers down."

Smart was caught up in those efforts himself. He had suffered a back
injury during a previous tour in Iraq when his Bradley Fighting
Vehicle crashed, and his injuries were so severe, the Army finally
allowed him medical retirement last month, after determining he was
no longer fit to serve.

Medical retirement from the Army is a lengthy, paperwork-intensive
process, one that had started for Smart last December. But to his
astonishment, Smart's commanders pushed to deploy him in March, even
as the paperwork for his medical retirement was working its way
through the bureaucracy. "They were definitely wanting me to be
deployed," Smart said. "Up until a few weeks ago, I was set to go on
a plane," he said.

Smart saved an e-mail exchange in which his battalion commander, Lt.
Col. Todd Ratliff, suggests that if the paperwork for Smart's medical
retirement was not complete when the unit deployed, Smart might be
forced to come along. "If for some reason you are still around when
we deploy there is a chance we may take you to support us in Kuwait,"
Ratliff wrote in an e-mail to Smart on Feb. 16.

Smart fought against his redeployment, using the resources available
to him as an officer to carefully shepherd his medical retirement
papers through the Army bureaucracy just in time. But the experience
left him worried about injured enlisted soldiers who were not so
lucky -- and left him furious at those in charge. Military commanders
"could care less about the soldier's physical and mental welfare, as
long as they can shoot straight," Smart said. "Our military is
stretched to its breaking point," he added. "Commanders are being
backed into a corner in order to produce units that on paper are
ready to deploy. They are casting the moral and ethical implications
-- and soldiers -- to the side."

Smith, the enlisted soldier who was hospitalized, began noticing
symptoms of his PTSD within months of returning from Iraq in January
2005, a tour that included significant time in Ramadi, a hotbed of
the insurgency. It was nasty, face-to-face work, Smith said, which
included a lot of "kicking down doors."

Smith's medical records are sadly typical of soldiers beset by PTSD.
His doctors have documented agitation, irritability, anxiety,
nightmares, flashbacks and a heightened startle response. He has a
hard time going out in public. "My family had noticed some big
differences with me," after his tour in Iraq, he recalled, including
his sudden, intense anger. "They said, 'Hey, you need help.'"

Smith sought treatment, and doctors soon diagnosed chronic PTSD. He
is now heavily medicated, taking anti-psychotic pills and
antidepressants.

His records show him struggling with his symptoms as the brigade was
gearing up to deploy. On Feb. 8, several military doctors completed a
"report of mental status evaluation" on Smith. "It is highly
recommended that patient be placed on non-deployable status and have
no access to weapons," the doctors wrote. On Feb. 20, another doctor
circled "violence risk" on another of Smith's health-assessment forms.

But two weeks after that violence-risk notation, Smith found himself
just hours away from stepping on to a plane to Iraq. He was running
out of time and options. His company commander had already gone to
bat for him, with no luck. Smith claims that on two separate
occasions, his company commander took his doctors' notes to the
brigade commander, Col. Wayne W. Grigsby Jr., in an effort to
persuade Grigsby to leave Smith behind in doctors' care. "I've got to
hand it to my company commander for trying," Smith said. But Smith
said his company commander told him that Grigsby wouldn't budge.
Smith resorted to checking himself into the hospital.

Privacy rules restrict what Army commanders can say about an
individual soldier's medical file. Public affairs officials for the
3rd Infantry Division did not respond to questions for this report on
the plight of soldiers who were deployed with injuries. The division
surgeon, Lt. Col. George Appenzeller, confirmed in an interview last
month that medical officials met with 75 soldiers on Feb. 15.
However, Appenzeller maintained that it was to conduct medical exams,
update paperwork and make sure injured troops were getting the best
healthcare possible.

Grigsby, the 3rd Brigade commander, said in an interview last month
that the well-being of his soldiers was among his top priorities. He
did not deny deploying injured troops, but he asserted that the
injured soldiers who were deployed were to be confined to relatively
safe jobs. He said those troops would work in a capacity that
strictly followed each soldier's "physical profile," a document
prepared by doctors spelling out a soldier's physical limitations.

But one injured soldier who was deployed to Iraq in March wrote in an
e-mail to Salon that her back condition has worsened significantly.
"Now my left leg has started to go numb and they are telling me to
double up on my meds, which I can't," she wrote. "They are not
putting us in safe jobs at all. I still wear all of my gear and by
the end of the day the pain is more than unbearable," she added. "I
break my [physical] profile pretty much on a daily basis. At this
point I will either go back [home] in a wheel chair or paralyzed or
worse."

"Do what you can," she pleaded in the e-mail, "for the [injured
soldiers] that come after me."

As Salon revealed in a second report on March 26, the commanders of
the 3rd Brigade shipped dozens of injured soldiers to Fort Irwin,
Calif., in January as the brigade conducted a month of desert-warfare
training. The injured soldiers were put up in two large tents, doing
odd jobs and biding their time. Some military experts said they
believed commanders were attempting to artificially boost manpower
statistics by making it appear that a healthier percentage of the
brigade was out in the desert training for Iraq deployment.

Both Smith and Smart were among the dozens of soldiers who spent
weeks in those tents. Neither could properly train. Smith had already
been diagnosed with PTSD at that time, and would awaken at night
agitated by the sound of mortars going off in the desert that were
used for training. Neither Smith nor Smart was treated for his
medical problems while in the desert.

In Smart's case, that went directly against the recommendations of
his doctors. "I believe taking a month off from his treatment plan
will be detrimental to his condition," one chiropractor wrote in
Smart's file in late December. "Lack of treatment for this prolonged
period of time could cause a setback in his condition that may be
difficult to recover."

Military families are angered by the treatment of injured soldiers
based at Fort Benning. Janie Smith, Thomas' mother, says she was
horrified that the Army tried to send her ailing son back to Iraq,
which prompted her to contact the media about his predicament.

She described him as an outgoing, personable boy. But the 26-year-old
man who came back from Iraq is quiet, withdrawn and sometimes
suddenly, frighteningly angry, she says. In a restaurant, he sits
facing the door, ready to confront an enemy at any moment. His hands
constantly shake. "He is an entirely different person," Janie
explained in a phone interview.

Janie said she was glad when her son first joined the Army. "I was
really proud of him," she recalled. But while she is still proud of
her son, her feelings for the Army have changed. "They don't care,"
she said. "I don't know what I'm going to do now."

The Army's inspector general and the Government Accountability Office
have both launched inquiries since Salon first reported on the
deployment of injured troops. There is no indication of when either
will issue its findings.

-- By Mark Benjamin

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

22) Huge Protest in Iraq Demands U.S. Withdraw
By EDWARD WONG
April 10, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/world/middleeast/10iraq.html?ref=world

BAGHDAD, April 9 — Tens of thousands of protesters loyal
to Moktada al-Sadr, the Shiite cleric, took to the streets
of the holy city of Najaf on Monday in an extraordinarily
disciplined rally to demand an end to the American military
presence in Iraq, burning American flags and chanting
“Death to America!”

Residents said that the angry, boisterous demonstration
was the largest in Najaf, the heart of Shiite religious
power, since the American-led invasion in 2003. It took
place on the fourth anniversary of the fall of Baghdad,
and it was an obvious effort by Mr. Sadr to show the
extent of his influence here in Iraq, even though he
did not appear at the rally. Mr. Sadr went underground
after the American military began a new security push
in Baghdad on Feb. 14, and his whereabouts are unknown.

Mr. Sadr used the protest to try to reassert his image
as a nationalist rebel who appeals to both anti-American
Shiites and Sunni Arabs. He established that reputation
in 2004, when he publicly supported Sunni insurgents
in Falluja who were battling United States marines,
and quickly gained popularity among Sunnis across Iraq
and the region. But his nationalist credentials have
been tarnished in the last year, as Sunni Arabs have
accused Mr. Sadr’s militia, the Mahdi Army, of torturing
and killing Sunnis.

Iraqi policemen and soldiers lined the path taken by
the protesters, and there were no reports of violence
during the day. The American military handed security
oversight of the city and province of Najaf to the Iraqi
government in December, and the calm atmosphere showed
that the Iraqi security forces could maintain control,
keeping suicide bombers away from an obvious target.
In March, when millions of Shiite pilgrims flocked
to the holy cities of the south, Iraqi security forces
in provinces adjoining Najaf failed to stop bombers
from killing scores of them.

Vehicles were not allowed near Monday’s march, and
Baghdad had a daylong ban on traffic to prevent
outbreaks of violence.

During the protest in Najaf, Sadr followers draped
themselves in Iraqi flags and waved them to symbolize
national unity, and a small number of conservative Sunni
Arabs took part in the march.

“We have 30 people who came,” said Ayad Abdul Wahab,
an agriculture professor in Basra and an official in
the Iraqi Islamic Party, a leading fundamentalist Sunni
Arab group. “We support Moktada in this demonstration,
and we stress our rejection of foreign occupation.”

He and his friends together carried a 30-foot-long
Iraqi flag.

In the four years of war, the only other person who
has been able to call for protests of this scale has
been Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, Iraq’s most
powerful Shiite cleric, who, like Mr. Sadr, has
a home in Najaf.

The protest was in some ways another challenge to the
Shiite clerical hierarchy, showing that in the new Iraq,
a violent young upstart like Mr. Sadr can command the
masses right in the backyard of venerable clerics like
Ayatollah Sistani. Mr. Sadr has increasingly tapped
into a powerful desire among Shiites to stand up
forcefully to both the American presence and militant
Sunnis, and to ignore calls for moderation from older
clerics.

Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, an American military
spokesman in Baghdad, said that American officers
had helped officials in Najaf plan security for the
event, but that the Iraqis had taken the lead.

Colonel Garver and other American officials tried
to put the best possible light on the event, despite
the fiery words. “We say that we’re here to support
democracy,” he said. “We say that free speech and
freedom of assembly are part of that. While we don’t
necessarily agree with the message, we agree with
their right to say it.”

The protest unfolded as heavy fighting continued
in parts of Diwaniya, a southern city where American
and Iraqi forces have been battling cells of the Mahdi
Army since Friday. Mr. Sadr issued a statement on Sunday
calling for the Mahdi militiamen and the Iraqi forces
there to stop fighting each other, but those words
went unheeded. Gun battles broke out on Monday, and
an American officer said at a news conference that
at least one American soldier had been killed and
one wounded in four days of clashes.

That fighting and the protest in Najaf, as well as
Mr. Sadr’s mysterious absence, raise questions about
how much control he actually maintains over his militia.
Mr. Sadr is obviously still able to order huge numbers
of people into the streets, but there has been talk
that branches of his militia have split off and now
operate independently. In Baghdad, some Mahdi Army
cells have refrained in the last two months from
attacking Americans and carrying out killings of
Sunni Arabs, supposedly on orders from Mr. Sadr,
but bodies of Sunnis have begun reappearing in some
neighborhoods in recent weeks.

The protest in Najaf was made up mostly of young men,
many of whom drove down from the sprawling Sadr City
section of Baghdad, some 100 miles north, the previous
night. They gathered Monday morning in the town of Kufa,
where Mr. Sadr has his main mosque, and walked a few
miles to Sadrain Square in Najaf. Protesters stomped
on American flags and burned them. “No, no America;
leave, leave occupier,” they chanted. At Sadrain Square,
the protesters listened to a statement read over
loudspeakers that was attributed to Mr. Sadr.

“Oh Iraqi people, you are aware, as 48 months have
passed, that we live in a state of oppression,
unjust repression and occupation,” the statement
read. “Forty-eight hard months — that make four years
— in which we have gotten nothing but more killing,
destruction and degradation. Tens of people are being
killed every day. Tens are disabled every day.”

Mr. Sadr added: “America made efforts to stoke
sectarian strife, and here I would like to tell you,
the sons of the two rivers, that you have proved your
ability to surpass difficulties and sacrifice yourselves,
despite the conspiracies of the evil powers against you.”

An Interior Ministry employee in a flowing tan robe,
Haider Abdul Rahim Mustafa, 23, said that he had come
from Basra “to demand the withdrawal of the occupier.”

“The occupier supported Saddam and helped him to become
stronger, then removed him because his cards were burned,”
he said, using an Arabic expression to note that Saddam
Hussein was no longer useful to the United States.
“The fall of Saddam means nothing to us as long
as the alternative is the American occupation.”

Estimates of the crowd’s size varied wildly. A police
commander in Najaf, Brig. Gen. Abdul Karim al-Mayahi,
said there were at least half a million people. Colonel
Garver said that military reports had estimates of
5,000 to 7,000. Residents and other Iraqi officials
said there were tens of thousands, and television
images of the rally seemed to support their estimates.

The colonel declined to give any information on the
whereabouts of Mr. Sadr, though American military
officials said weeks ago that they believed he is
in Iran. Mr. Sadr’s aides declined to say where he
is, but previously they have said he remained in Iraq.

In Diwaniya, hospital officials said their wards were
overwhelmed by casualties. There was a shortage
of food and oxygen, and ambulances were being blocked
from the scene of combat, said Dr. Hamid Jaati, the
city’s health director. The main hospital received
13 dead Iraqis and 41 injured ones over the weekend,
he added.

The fighting started Friday after the provincial
council and governor called for the Iraqi Army and
American forces to take on the Sadr militiamen. The
governor and 28 of 40 council members belong to
a powerful Shiite party called the Supreme Council
for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, which is the
main rival to the Sadr organization. Sadr officials
have accused the party of using the military to
carry out a political grudge, but the governor,
Khalil Jalil Hamza, denied that on Monday.

In Diyala Province, northeast of Baghdad, a suicide
car bomb killed three civilians and wounded four
thers on Sunday night, police officials said Monday.
Also in Diyala, a local politician was fatally shot
on Monday in Hibhib, and three bodies were found
in Khalis.

Iraqi employees of The New York Times contributed
reporting from Najaf and Diwaniya.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

23) High Stakes: Chávez Plays the Oil Card
“Chávez poses a much bigger threat to America’s energy
security than Saddam Hussein ever did.”
By SIMON ROMERO and CLIFFORD KRAUSS
April 10, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/business/worldbusiness/10showdown.html

CARACAS, Venezuela, April 9 — With President Hugo Chávez
setting a May 1 deadline for an ambitious plan to wrest
control of several major oil projects from American and
European companies, a showdown is looming here over access
to some of the most coveted energy resources outside
the Middle East.

Moving beyond empty threats to cut off all oil exports
to the United States, officials have recently stepped
up the pressure on the oil companies operating here,
warning that they might sell American refineries meant
to process Venezuelan crude oil even as they seek new
outlets in China and elsewhere around the world.

“Chávez is playing a game of chicken with the largest
oil companies in the world,” said Pietro Pitts, an oil
analyst who publishes LatinPetroleum, an industry
magazine based here. “And for the moment he is winning.”

But this confrontation could easily end up with
everyone losing.

The biggest energy companies could be squeezed out
of the most promising oil patch in the Western
Hemisphere. But Venezuela risks undermining the
engine behind Mr. Chávez’s socialist-inspired
revolution by hampering its ability to transform
the nation’s newly valuable heavy oil into riches
for years to come.

As Mr. Chávez asserts much greater control over
Venezuela’s oil industry, his national oil company,
Petróleos de Venezuela, is already showing signs of
stress. Management has become increasingly politicized,
and money for maintenance and development is being
diverted to pay for a surge in public spending.

During the last several decades, control of global
oil reserves has steadily passed from private companies
to national oil companies like Petróleos de Venezuela.
According to a new Rice University study, 77 percent
of the world’s 1.148 trillion barrels of proven
reserves is in the hands of the national companies;
14 of the top 20 oil-producing companies are state-
controlled.

The implications are potentially stark for the
United States, which imports 60 percent of its oil.
State companies tend to be far less efficient and
innovative, and far more politicized. No place
captures the shift in power to nationalist governments
like Venezuela.

“We are on a collision course with Chávez over oil,”
said Michael J. Economides, an oil consultant in Houston
who wrote an influential essay comparing Mr. Chávez’s
populist appeal in Latin America with the pan-Arabism
of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi of Libya two decades ago.
“Chávez poses a much bigger threat to America’s energy
security than Saddam Hussein ever did.”

Consider the quandary facing Exxon Mobil after its
chairman, Rex W. Tillerson, recently suggested that
Exxon might be forced to abandon a major Venezuelan
oil project because of its growing troubles with
Mr. Chávez.

The energy world took notice. So did Mr. Chávez’s
government.

Only a day later, Venezuelan agents raided Exxon’s
offices here in the San Ignacio towers, a bastion
for this country’s business elite. The government
said that the raid was part of a tax investigation,
but energy analysts said the exchange of threat and
counterthreat was all too clear.

Politics and ideology are driving the confrontation
here as Mr. Chávez seeks to limit American influence
around the world, starting in Venezuela’s oil fields.
Mr. Chávez views the Bush administration as a threat,
in part because it indirectly supported a coup that
briefly removed him from power five years ago. Yet
the United States remains Venezuela’s largest customer.

Mr. Chávez recently decreed that Venezuela would take
control of heavy oil fields in the Orinoco Belt,
a region southeast of Caracas of so much potential
that some experts say it could give the country more
reserves than Saudi Arabia. The United States Geological
Survey describes the area as the “largest single
hydrocarbon accumulation in the world,” making it
highly coveted despite Mr. Chávez’s erratic policies.

By setting a May 1 deadline for what some foreign oil
executives consider an expropriation, the Venezuelan
leader risks losing Exxon, ConocoPhillips and other
companies, which are loath to put their employees and
billions of dollars in assets under Venezuelan management.

A departure of expertise and investment could weaken
an oil industry already unsettled by being transformed
into Mr. Chávez’s most crucial tool for carrying out
his reconfiguration of Venezuelan society.

Mr. Chávez has raised taxes on foreign oil companies
and forced other oil ventures to come under his
government’s control. And he has purged more than
17,000 employees from Petróleos de Venezuela after
a debilitating strike about four years ago.

The talks have bogged down over how much the oil
companies’ stakes in four big Orinoco projects are
worth, whether Venezuela’s cash-short oil company
would pay for the assets in oil instead of cash and,
most important, who would manage the reduced operations
of the foreign oil companies.

Still prevented from producing oil in places like Saudi
Arabia and Mexico, the companies desperately want
to hold on to their Venezuelan reserves. Companies
like Exxon, whose Venezuelan assets were nationalized
in the 1970s and returned to it in the 1990s, know
the pitfalls of operating here and figure that
Mr. Chávez will not be around forever.

With oil prices at high levels, oil-rich countries
as varied as Angola, Norway and Russia are also waiting
to see how the talks unfold. Governments in Kazakhstan
and Nigeria are trying to negotiate better terms with
foreign oil companies as well. But none are doing
so with Mr. Chávez’s revolutionary flourish.

“It is a defining moment,” said Christopher Ruppel,
a geopolitical risk analyst at John S. Herold Inc.,
the energy consulting firm.

Last week, Rafael Ramírez, Venezuela’s energy
minister, sent a chilling signal to the oil companies,
saying Venezuela might sell refineries in Texas and
Louisiana that process crude from Exxon’s Venezuelan
oil fields. Analysts say Venezuela could be setting
the stage to produce much less oil in ventures with
American oil companies for export to the United States.

The oil companies decline to talk publicly about the
negotiations, but people in the industry say Exxon
and ConocoPhillips, two of the largest American companies
in Venezuela, are digging in their heels. The companies,
however, lack a united front: Chevron is expected to
accept Mr. Chávez’s terms, since it is also negotiating
access to a large natural gas project in Venezuela.

“If the majors want to negotiate a settlement, they
have to be able to let Chávez save face and look
like he has won this with his people,” said Michael
S. Goldberg, head of the international dispute
resolution group at Baker Botts, a law firm in
Houston that represents many of the major oil
companies around the world.

For decades, Venezuela has been a leading supplier
of oil to American refineries, a resilient economic
relationship that remains intact despite deteriorating
political ties. Venezuela is the fourth-largest
supplier of oil to the United States, accounting
for more than 10 percent of American oil imports.

Once Venezuela’s heavy oil is counted, its reserves
may surpass those of Saudi Arabia or Canada, though
the oil will be worthless without ventures to extract
it. American oil producers are drawn here by Venezuela’s
80 billion barrels of proven oil reserves, among the
largest outside the Middle East.

But Mr. Chávez is chipping away at those ties by
forming ventures with state oil companies from China,
Iran, India and Brazil. Venezuelan exports of oil and
refined products to the United States fell 8.2 percent
to a 12-year low in 2006 of about 1.3 million barrels
a day, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Meanwhile, Mr. Chávez has accepted higher shipping
costs to reach China, expanding exports tenfold to
about 160,000 barrels a day since 2004.

“If the United States wants to diversify its oil
supplies for reasons of national security, then
Venezuela should be allowed to diversify its customer
base for the same reason,” said Mazhar al-Shereidah,
an Iraqi-born petroleum economist who is one of
Venezuela’s leading energy experts.

But even under the best of circumstances, China’s
retooling of its refineries to handle Venezuela’s
sour, or high-sulfur, crude oil could take five to
seven years. And it is not clear whether Mr. Chávez’s
new foreign energy partners are prepared to invest
heavily until they are confident they can trust him.

In a country where many facets of life are politicized,
output levels are no exception. Venezuela says it
produces 3.3 million barrels a day, but OPEC officials
say production is closer to 2.5 million, 1 million
barrels less than in 1999 when Mr. Chávez’s presidency
began.

No one sees an immediate crisis at Petróleos de Venezuela.
But its windfall from high oil prices masks the devilish
complexity and rising costs of producing heavy oil.

Meanwhile, the company acknowledged last month that
spending on “social development” almost doubled in 2006,
to $13.3 billion, while its spending on exploration badly
trailed its global peers. And Petróleos de Venezuela’s
work force has ballooned to 89,450, up 29 percent since
2001 even as production declined.

Independent analysts are alarmed by a troubling increase
in explosions and refining accidents during the last
two years, which authorities brush off as sabotage.
Mr. Ramírez, the energy minister, declined repeated
requests for an interview.

With heavily subsidized domestic oil consumption surging,
the government spends an estimated $9 billion to keep
gasoline prices under 20 cents a gallon. Moreover,
Mr. Chávez uses Petróleos de Venezuela to finance other
nationalizations, like its $739 million purchase
of an electric utility in Caracas from the
AES Corporation.

Petróleos de Venezuela’s cash is said to be running
short as Mr. Chávez uses its revenue to cement political
alliances with Bolivia, Cuba and Nicaragua. The company
has borrowed more than $11 billion since the start
of the year, a rapid debt buildup that reflects
a wager by Mr. Chávez that oil prices will remain high
indefinitely.

Simon Romero reported from Caracas, Clifford Krauss
from Houston.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

24) General Wants Increased Troops Into Fall
By THE NEW YORK TIMES
April 10, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/world/middleeast/10troops.html

WASHINGTON, April 9 — The top American commander in Iraq
has recommended that reinforced troop levels in Iraq be
maintained at least through September, Pentagon officials
said Monday.

The commander, Gen. David H. Petraeus, recommended that
the current level of 20 ground combat brigades be
maintained into the fall, they said.

Pentagon officials are examining options for how to
maintain the buildup. A leading option is to extend
the deployment of four ground combat brigades and an
aviation brigade, which have a combined strength of
more than 15,000 troops.

President Bush announced in January that five additional
combat brigades were to be deployed in Iraq as part
of a troop buildup.

Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, the day-to-day commander
of American forces in Iraq and the second-ranking
official there, has advised that the increased troop
levels are needed through February 2008.

Additional deployments and tour extensions would
be required to maintain such an increase into the
early part of 2008.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

25) U.S. Raid on an Immigrant Household
Deepens Anger and Mistrust
By NINA BERNSTEIN
April 10, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/nyregion/10suffolk.html?ref=nyregion

EAST HAMPTON, N.Y. — Awakened by banging on the front door
and the shouts of strangers inside her family’s sprawling
suburban home, Erica Leon, 12, thought at first that the
house was on fire.

Then her bedroom door burst open, she said, and armed men
in blue bulletproof vests pushed in, demanding to know
if she was hiding someone. They pressed on to the room
where 4-year-old Carson was asleep with their mother,
and pulled off the covers.

“They started screaming at my mom real bad,” Erica said.
“I wasn’t crying, but I was, like, terrified. Like,
who are you guys?”

They were federal immigration agents hunting for an
illegal immigrant — Erica’s long-absent father, Patrizio
Wilson Garcia, who was ordered deported after his 2003
divorce from Erica’s mother, Adriana, and has not lived
in the house since. But they had entered a three-generation
immigrant household where everyone was an American citizen
by naturalization or birth.

To the Leon family, Hispanics who have owned their house
here on Copeces Lane for seven years, the early-morning
raid on Feb. 20 seemed like the ultimate indignity in
a history of hostile scrutiny. But to some residents,
it was an overdue response by federal authorities to
long-simmering concerns about illegal immigration on
Long Island’s East End.

Since 2000, neighbors’ complaints about the family’s
volleyball games, their many cars, their living
arrangements, even the fallen tree limbs in their yard,
have prompted more than 18 inspections by town code
enforcers and repeated surveillance by the town police,
records show. Often officials found nothing to cite;
occasionally they issued notices of violations that
ended in court fines. Typically, the Leons complied
with official demands, only to face fresh complaints.

Federal immigration officials would not say what had
prompted the raid, which swept into four other East
Hampton houses and rounded up three dozen illegal
immigrants. But the operation had nothing to do with
town code enforcement, the officials said, or with
Steve Levy, the Suffolk County executive, who has
won national attention by vowing to move against
illegal immigrants the federal government ignores.

They also said Erica’s grandmother let them in,
providing consent for a search that others in the
household could not legally stop.

Residents on both sides see the raid — the first in
recent memory in this wealthy beachfront community —
as the latest escalation in a wave of crackdowns driven
by complaints against immigrants at every level
of government. And it points to a sense of frustration
in both camps that is making Suffolk County one of
the hotbeds of the nation’s immigration debate.

“People here are fed up,” said Richard Herrlin,
a neighbor of the Leons’ who welcomed the raid and
described himself as a builder of $20 million mansions.
“It’s possible the feds showed up because the town
officials have done nothing for years, because the
town is terrified of being accused of racial
insensitivity.”

For him and some others in the neighborhood, where
large wooded lots and winding roads bring to mind
rural New England, irritation over what they described
as the Leons’ noise, trash and traffic has fed on deeper
anger over an influx of Hispanic illegal immigrants
on the East End. There are festering grievances about
taxes, schools crowded with Spanish speakers and
homes turned into rooming houses.

For the Leons and other immigrant families, meanwhile,
confusion over what civil rights, if any, apply in
such raids heightens new feelings of vulnerability.

“Your house is supposed to be where you’re safe,
right?” said Andres Leon, 22, Erica’s uncle. “When
you see police, you’re supposed to feel protected.
But the way they acted, we don’t feel protected;
we feel violated.”

Ms. Leon, now remarried, had even obtained an order
of protection against Mr. Garcia before their divorce
ended his temporary legal status and led to the
deportation order.

In a strange twist, that became the legal basis for
a Fugitive Operations team of seven agents to bang
on the Leons’ door at 5 a.m.

Like the family’s American life, the house, on 3.8
acres in a middle-class section, is still a work in
progress. But it is now valued at about $1 million,
nearly four times what the Leons paid for it in 2000,
before they added 70 percent more finished space,
step by step, with earnings from housecleaning,
carpentry and a home beauty salon.

The first to arrive in the United States, more than
25 years ago, was Ramon Leon, who works as a cabinetmaker
for Central Kitchen Corporation in Southampton. It took
him years to win permanent residency under the 1986
immigration amnesty, and years more to bring his wife,
Elena, and three children — Adriana, Jazmin and Andres
— to join him legally. Erica and her little sister had
to be left behind in Ecuador for seven years and joined
their mother only three years ago. The household now
comprises six adults and five children.

By the spring of 2002, neighbors were complaining that
two volleyball courts built by the Leons had become
the site of large, sometimes raucous sporting events
that drew dozens of people.

All over East Hampton, such games were a flashpoint
between longtime residents and Latino immigrants,
whose numbers were soaring. And the clashes fueled
resentments that helped elect local politicians who
promised to crack down on illegal immigrants or
“quality of life” violations.

Despite complaints and petitions, officials were
unable to shut down the games. At the Leons’, for
example, the East Hampton police reported no violations
after surveillance over a three-day weekend in 2002
found 15 to 40 people, most of them playing volleyball;
20 vehicles “all registered and legally parked”;
and “very little noise.”

But the games had stopped by 2004, after Adriana, 30,
married Norman Aguilar, who took over his father-in-
law’s share of the mortgage. “I don’t want any problems,”
said Mr. Aguilar, who was born in Costa Rica and is
a manager at a newspaper distribution company, as well
as an agent for a financial services company, Primerica.
“I just want to live in peace.”

By then, however, neighborhood complaints seemed
to have a life of their own. When Jazmin Leon opened
her one-chair home beauty salon — allowed under the
residential code — neighbors tried to shut it down
over the scissors sign seen through the picture window.
When Mr. Aguilar painted a rock white, a neighbor
produced town surveys to show that it jutted over
his property line by three or four inches.

“My wife wanted to sell the house,” Mr. Aguilar said.
“I told her no, anywhere you go, you’ll have the same
problems. I feel like for us it’s, like, getting harder
in this town. The laws that they’re putting on us,
it’s, like, against Hispanic people.”

Some residents say the town does not enforce codes the
same way against city people in time shares, or houses
crowded with Irish summer workers.

“Profiling is not about who you raid, it’s who you
don’t raid — who gets the winks and who gets the
handcuffs,” said Amado Ortiz, 60, an American-born
architect who joined the board of OLA, a Latino
immigrant advocacy group, after being “radicalized,”
he said, by an increasingly anti-Hispanic climate.

William E. McGintee, the town supervisor, dismissed
such complaints of bias as “nonsense.”

“We don’t have a large influx of illegal immigrants
from Russia,” he said. “We have Ecuadoreans, we have
Peruvians, we have Mexicans. We don’t know who
is living in those houses; we get complaints,
and it’s complaint-driven.”

But the limited effect of such complaints only
heightens the frustration of residents like Lucinda
Murphy, a registered nurse who volunteered that
she and her husband, Sean, a television news
producer, had often called the police about
cars parked at the Leons’.

Ms. Murphy, who has three children, voiced larger
misgivings about illegal immigrants with children
in the local school. She called them “freeloaders.”

“I’m paying taxes, they’re not,” she said. “Yet
their kids still get to go to school with the
privileges of my kids. I resent it.”

City dwellers with weekend houses on Copeces Lane
have also complained about the Leons, upset that
property values could be hurt by the less-upscale
Latinos, said Richard Dunn, 65, an East Hampton
teacher.

“This is a town that’s driven by money and real
estate,” he said. “People who are so concerned
about Latinos feel they’re being driven out.”

His own house is cleaned by Adriana Leon and her
mother. “I have nothing but good feelings for them,”
he said.

On the morning of the raid, Mr. Aguilar, 40, had
already left for work. He returned to find the
shaken family reading the Bible together in the
kitchen.

For a time, the house became a gathering place
for immigrants rounded up at other houses that
morning, who were mostly released with notices
to appear at deportation proceedings. Their accounts
of the raids galvanized a group of local clergy,
Hispanic activists and even a religious organization
based in Costa Rica that flew in counselors.

“It would appear that in the war against terrorism,
agents of our nation are now acting in the role
of terrorizers,” the group of local clergy, East
End Clergy Concerned, wrote their congressman in
a letter asking for an investigation.

Mr. Aguilar tried to file a complaint about the
raid with the town police but was rebuffed. “We don’t
conduct investigations on another law enforcement agency,”
Todd Sarris, the chief of police, explained.

Nor was the raid a mistake, said Christopher Shanahan,
director of deportation and removal for Immigration
and Customs Enforcement in the New York region.

“We would like to find fugitive aliens at 100 percent
of the locations we go to, but it’s not an exact
science,” he said.

No records are kept to show how often the teams
find the fugitives they are seeking. And the rules
for the searches are murky.

Unlike a criminal search warrant, which requires
a judge to review the evidence and find probable
cause for a search, the “administrative warrant”
used by immigration agents is approved only by
the team’s supervisor — and is valid only with
the consent of the occupants, Mr. Shanahan said.

But in what he described as standard practice,
that consent bears little resemblance to what
laymen or constitutional scholars expect. Once
Erica’s grandmother let agents over the threshold,
Mr. Shanahan said, there was no turning back.

“Due to officer safety needs, they can look into
other areas, to clear rooms,” he said. But he added:
“If officers did something to humiliate people,
I want to know about it. We are very adamant that
we want our officers to be professional.”

On a recent afternoon, back from a seventh-grade
civics lesson on the separation of powers, Erica
spoke about what had changed since the raid.

“My mom wanted me to sleep in her room so I wouldn’t
be scared,” she said. “Sometimes, we have heard,
they take parents away from the children, or they
take children from the parents.”

When the agents left, she remembered, “they said
they might come back.”

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

26) In East Harlem School Closing, Talk of a Class Divide
By DAVID GONZALEZ
April 10, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/nyregion/10citywide.html?ref=nyregion

Lourdes Velasquez has seen it all in East Harlem. In the
old days, it was a neighborhood for poor and working-class
families. In the bad days, it was beset by guns and drugs.
And now?

Doormen. New high-rise buildings. Higher prices at the local
supermarket. Young couples pushing strollers that cost more
than a month’s rent in yet-to-be-renovated buildings.

While she resented these gentrifiers who “discovered” the
only neighborhood she has known for all of her 35 years,
she also tried to ensure that her daughter, Chrystal, would
be able to deal with the changes. She sent the girl to
St. Francis de Sales School on East 97th Street off Lexington
Avenue, paying $3,000 a year to give her the kind of Catholic
education that enabled previous generations of working-class
children to become professionals.

But now St. Francis de Sales School itself may be joining
the gentry.

Ms. Velasquez and the other parents of almost 200 students
in the school’s eight grades were abruptly told in early
March that the school would close in June. But officials
at the Archdiocese of New York, as well as other parents
and clergy familiar with recent events, said they expected
that the school would reopen in a year, possibly as a more
expensive private academy or preschool.

“They just want us out to make room for the new and
improved people,” Ms. Velasquez said. “There is a plan
for this neighborhood. I mean, look at First Avenue.
They got doormen! It’s all connected. Look at Second
Avenue. Why do they want to finish the subway now?
These are not different issues. It’s all connected.”

A little more than a decade ago, archdiocesan officials
considered the school exemplary in its efforts to educate
students in East Harlem. Then it was known as St. Francis
de Sales & St. Lucy Academy, with some 600 students
in two buildings. (Full disclosure: this reporter wrote
a long article about the school’s success and was later
made an honorary eighth-grade graduate).

Falling enrollment led to St. Lucy’s closing three
years ago. St. Francis de Sales continued as its own
school in its building on East 97th Street, serving
the working-class families, even as new and more
expensive housing was springing up all over the
neighborhood, including a high-rise next door. Parents
saw the school — located in a pristine, if bland,
red-brick building — as a haven that nurtured their
dreams for their children.

But as the neighborhood changed, so did things at the
school. A new pastor, the Rev. Victor Muzzin, came
in about three years ago, inheriting a school that
had had a stormy relationship with its previous
pastor. A new principal soon followed.

Father Muzzin said he arrived at the parish to find
$1,000 in its account and the school in debt. The
school, he said, now has a $250,000 deficit. Tuition
was raised only recently to $3,000 a year from $2,600
a year. Numbers like that, he said, made it hard to
keep it open.

“I am not the kind of pastor who wakes up and says,
‘Gee, I have a $250,000 debt.’ I saw it coming three
years earlier,” Father Muzzin said. “There was no
hope for me to save this school.”

An archdiocesan spokeswoman said that the decision
to close the school was the parish’s, but that the
archdiocese accepted it. Nor was it tied to the recent
announcement that another shuttered Catholic school
in Greenwich Village will reopen as a Catholic
academy, with annual tuition approaching $25,000,
said the spokeswoman, Jacqueline Lofaro.

“They felt they could not support the school in its
current incarnation,” Ms. Lofaro said. “What they
plan to do is step back for a year and reopen it
as some kind of parish school.”

Just what kind remains to be seen. Father Muzzin
said he had no plans at the moment, and that he
was not inclined to rent out the school building
to another private, secular school. Many parents
said that might be because he wants to open a more
expensive academy there.

A little over a year ago, Father Muzzin said as
much in the Sunday bulletin distributed at Mass.
In it, he described how the school — which parents
said served primarily black and Latino students —
needed to attract a greater “variety of people”
from the area.

“Some parents have to wake up to the realization
that they cannot afford Catholic Education,”
he wrote. “Period.”

The pastor’s message became clearer a few lines
later: “I see the day in the not distant future
when it will become the school of choice of all
the Catholic parents in the neighborhood who now
send their children to prestigious and pricey
private schools,” he wrote. “Why spend $25,000
when you can get the same thing for much, much
less?”

The bluntness of his comments riled many parents,
who felt betrayed. After several generations of the
church’s siding with the poor, parents saw in the
remarks their pastor declaring a preferential option
for the middle class.

“But he wants the black and Hispanic children out
first,” said Helen Torres, whose granddaughter
Alexis attends the school. “Ninety-sixth Street
is an up-and-coming area. But 30 years ago, it was
us, the immigrants and the working class who donated
our little pennies faithfully. He is turning his
back on this community.”

Father Muzzin countered that many of the students
in the school were actually from other neighborhoods
and commuted there with their parents, who worked
at nearby hospitals. (A former teacher said the
school has always drawn about a third of its students
from commuters).

“They dump their kids here, but they’re not creating
a community,” Father Muzzin said. “What has changed
is East Harlem is now creating community. From the
dump it was in the ’90s, now it is a flourishing
community.”

He added that there were other Catholic schools
in East Harlem that had improved. But he noted that
with all the changes in the southern fringe of the
neighborhood, middle-class parents needed other
educational options, too.

“They pay $3,000 rent for an apartment, and they
have these jobs, which are O.K. and provide them
with money, but at the end of the day they are
under the same pressure as the poor who want to
do good for themselves,” he said. “There is the
poor middle class. What has the church done for them?”

He suggested that while he could not see himself
opening an academy charging $25,000 a year or more,
some local families might respond to a Catholic school
charging $12,000.

“These are the people who come to church and leave
the little money that keeps the place open before
the marshal comes to close it down,” he said.

Last Wednesday, children and parents huddled outside
the school in the drizzle at the start of Easter recess.
Down the block, a construction crew went about finishing
a glass and metal sliver of a building that sprouted
on what had been a parking lot. Across the street,
an otherwise plain red-brick building that had been
renovated only recently was for sale as a townhouse.

Benedicta Almeida, a retired seamstress, slowly walked
away with her granddaughter, Faith Angelique, a first
grader at the school. The child, whom she is raising,
was doing well when she attended preschool at
St. Francis de Sales. First grade has been a little
rockier: her mother died from cancer last year.

“It has been a trauma,” she said. “She did not eat
or sleep for a while. She still cries.”

Ms. Almeida feels like crying herself. She, like
many other parents, said the closing came without
warning. She has yet to find another school for
the girl.

“This has affected her,” she said. “She is disoriented.
She asks me: ‘Where am I going? What will happen to me?’ ”

Ms. Velasquez is asking the same questions when
it comes to her neighborhood. First St. Lucy’s closed.
Now St. Francis de Sales. She is not taking a chance
with another local school and plans to send her daughter,
Chrystal, now a sixth grader, to a school on the West Side.

“I am all for progress, but do they have to push
us out?” she asked. “My daughter has been in two
schools that closed. It’s ridiculous. Everybody
is going to leave. It’s ridiculous, but that’s what
they want us to do.”

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

27) Reflections by the Commander in Chief
A BRUTAL REPLY
Fidel Castro Ruz
April 10, 2007
http://www.cuba.cu/gobierno/discursos/2007/ing/f100407i.html

George W. Bush is undoubtedly the most genuine representative of a system of
terror forced on the world by the technological, economic and political
superiority of the most powerful country known to this planet. For this
reason, we share the tragedy of the American people and their ethical
values. The instructions for the verdict issued by Judge Kathleen Cardone,
of the El Paso Federal Court last Friday, granting Luis Posada Carriles
freedom on bail, could only have come from the White House.

It was President Bush himself who ignored at all times the criminal and
terrorist nature of the defendant who was protected with a simple accusation
of immigration violation leveled at him. The reply is brutal. The government
of the United States and its most representative institutions had already
decided to release the monster.

The backgrounds are well-known and reach far back. The people who trained
him and ordered him to destroy a Cuban passenger plane in midair, with 73
athletes, students and other Cuban and foreign travelers on board, together
with its dedicated crew; those who bought his freedom while the terrorist
was held in prison in Venezuela, so that he could supply and practically
conduct a dirty war against the people of Nicaragua, resulting in the loss
of thousands of lives and the devastation of a country for decades to come;
those who empowered him to smuggle with drugs and weapons making a mockery
of the laws of Congress; those who collaborated with him to create the
terrible Operation Condor and to internationalize terror; the same who
brought torture, death and often the physical disappearance of hundreds of
thousands of Latin Americans, could not possibly act any different.

Even though Bush‚s decision was to be expected, it is certainly no less
humiliating for our people. Thanks to the revelations of „Por Esto!‰ a
Mexican publication from the state of Quintana Roo later complemented by our
own sources, Cuba knew with absolute precision how Posada Carriles entered
from Central America, via Cancun, to the Isla Mujeres departing from there
on board the Santrina, after the ship was inspected by the Mexican federal
authorities, heading with other terrorists straight to Miami.

Denounced and publicly challenged with exact information on the matter,
since April 15, 2005, it took the government of that country more than a
month to arrest the terrorist, and a year and two months to admit that Luis
Posada Carriles had entered through the Florida coast illegally on board the
Santrina, a presumed school-ship licensed in the United States.

Not a single word is said of his countless victims, of the bombs he set off
in tourist facilities in recent years, of his dozens of plans financed by
the government of the United States to physically eliminate me.

It was not enough for Bush to offend the name of Cuba by installing a
horrible torture center similar to Abu Ghraib on the territory illegally
occupied in Guantánamo, horrifying the world with this procedure. The cruel
actions of his predecessors seemed not enough for him. It was not enough to
force a poor and underdeveloped country like Cuba to spend 100 billion
dollars. To accuse Posada Carriles was tantamount to accusing himself.

Throughout almost half a century, everything was fair game against our small
island lying 90 miles away from its coast, wanting to be independent.
Florida saw the installation of the largest station for intelligence and
subversion that ever existed on this planet.

It was not enough to send a mercenary invasion on the Bay of Pigs, costing
us 176 dead and more than 300 wounded at a time when the few medical
specialists they left us had no experience treating war wounds.

Earlier still, the French ship La Coubre carrying Belgian weapons and
grenades for Cuba had exploded on the docks of Havana Harbor. The two well
synchronized explosions caused the deaths of more than 100 workers and
wounded others as many of them tool part in the rescue attempts.

It was not enough to have the Missile Crisis of 1962, which brought the
world to the brink of an all-consuming thermonuclear war, at a time when
there were bombs 50 times more powerful than the ones dropped on Hiroshima
and Nagasaki.

It was not enough to introduce in our country viruses, bacteria and fungi to
attack plantations and flocks; and incredible as it may seem, to attack
human beings. Some of these pathogens came out of American laboratories and
were brought to Cuba by well-known terrorists in the service of the United
States government.

Add to all this the enormous injustice of keeping five heroic patriots
imprisoned for supplying information about terrorist activities; they were
condemned in a fraudulent manner to sentences that include two life
sentences and they stoically withstand cruel mistreatment, each of them in a
different prison.

Time and again the Cuban people have fearlessly faced the threat of death.
They have demonstrated that with intelligence, using appropriate tactics and
strategies, and especially preserving unity around their political and
social vanguard, there can be no force on this earth capable of defeating
them.

I think that the coming May Day celebration would be the ideal day for our
people, --using the minimum of fuel and transportation-- to show their
feelings to the workers and the poor of the world.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

28) Now the South Erupts
Inter Press Service
Ali al-Fadhily*
http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/hard_news/archives/iraq/000564.php#more

BASRA, Apr 11 (IPS) - The eruption of demonstrations in the
south of Iraq this week could rob the occupation forces of
what was considered a critical bastion of support.

The southern areas of Iraq have long been said to be secure,
and people there peaceful towards the occupation forces. Iraqis
living in the south were also believed to be cooperative with
the occupation to the extent that they supported administrative
steps taken by successive Iraqi governments.

The majority of the population of the south are Shia Muslims,
and Iraq has had Shia- dominated governments under the occupation.

But demonstrations against the occupation and the United States
by hundreds of thousands of angry Shias in Najaf, Kut and other
cities across the south Apr. 9 mark a sharp break from a policy
of cooperation. Protesters demanded an end to the U.S.-led
occupation, burnt U.S. flags and chanted "Death to America!"

Brig. Gen. Abdul Karim al-Mayahi, a police commander in Najaf,
told reporters that at least half a million people joined the
demonstration there.

Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, a U.S. military spokesman in Baghdad,
told reporters, "We say that we're here to support democracy.
We say that free speech and freedom of assembly are part of that.
While we don't necessarily agree with the message, we agree with
their right to say it."

Clashes after the demonstration left at least one U.S. soldier
dead and another wounded in Diwaniyah, 180 km south of Baghdad.

"We have been patient and we have sacrificed a lot thinking the
situation would be better one day soon," Hussein Ali, a teacher
from Diwaniyah told IPS. "The result we see now is that we were
dragged into a swamp of hatred between brothers, and that all
the bloodshed was for the sake of war leaders to get more power
and fortune."

Fighting is continuing in Diwaniyah between the occupation
forces and the Mehdi Army led by Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.
Additional U.S. and Iraqi troops have been brought into the city
to make arrests and carry out door-to-door raids in search
of illegal weapons and wanted militiamen.

Muqtada al-Sadr, quiet for a considerable period after clashing
with U.S. troops early on in the occupation period, publicly
called on his militia to attack occupation troops.

So far this month, five occupation troops have been killed
every day on average, according to U.S. Department
of Defence figures.

The new Shia armed uprising, which appears to be in its early
days, is a further blow to occupation forces that are already
stretched thin.

"Four years of patience and what do we get?" Ali Hashim,
a merchant from the southern city Basra told IPS. "We got
nothing but the loss of our country to those who spoke a lot
but did nothing. The United States failed us and sold us cheap
to those who would have no mercy on us."

Mahmood al-Lamy, a historian from Basra told IPS the situation
there was critical.

"Basra is the biggest southern city and the only Iraqi city
that has a port near the Gulf. It is now controlled by various
militias who fight each other from time to time over an oil
smuggling business that is flourishing under the occupation."

Lamy said residents fear that "the situation here will be
a lot worse in the coming months due to disputes that are
appearing between major parties."

Lamy was referring to the withdrawal last month of the al-Fadhila
Party from the Shia Islamic Coalition Parliament Group, and the
dismissal of two ministers from the al-Sadr movement as
a punishment for contacting U.S. officials in Nasiriyah
in southern Iraq.

The Shia political group is increasingly divided over many
issues, and it seems unlikely that it will hold together.
But many of the groups are increasingly opposed to the
occupation.

"We were late to realise that we were wrong about U.S.
intentions," Salman Yassen of the Basra city municipality
council told IPS. "We waited four years while U.S. and Iraqi
authorities kept us busy fighting each other while they were
setting the plan of stealing our oil and tearing our country
apart so that their allies would feel safe."

Four years of the occupation of Iraq have seen many changes
in U.S. strategies, ambassadors and tactics, but the changes
may be too little, too late.

"The delay in moving politically has cost Iraq, the U.S.
and many other countries a great deal," former Iraqi police
colonel Ahmed Jabbar told IPS in Baghdad. "The least to be
said is that the world would have been better off without
this occupation and the catastrophic security disturbance
it has caused."

*(Ali, our correspondent in Baghdad, works in close collaboration
with Dahr Jamail, our U.S.-based specialist writer on Iraq who
travels extensively in the region)

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

29) Cuban Youth Searching for Their Inner Selves
Juventud Rebelde reveals the finding of its Third National Survey of Youth
2007-04-10 | 13:31:23 EST
http://www.juventudrebelde.co.cu/cuba/2007-04-10/cuban-youth-searching-for-their-inner-selves-/

The Cuban Center for Youth Studies (CESJ in Spanish) carried
out an important investigation – not only learn about young
people more deeply, but to encourage further studies.

The Third National Survey of Youth was given to more than
3,000 youngsters, ranging from 15 to 29 years of age, all
living in urban areas in all the provinces of the island.
The survey looked into conditions and influences, which
included their socio-demographic characteristics, housing
and economic conditions, education and employment situation,
and leisure opportunities.

Below, JR describes the youth interviewed and the
survey findings.

Looking Inside

For French writer Honore de Balzac, marriage was
“in the end, a passionate battle where spouses ask
for God’s blessing because loving ‘until death do
us part’ is the most frightful of tasks.” Maybe
this is why our youth suffer gamophobia (the fear
of marriage). Consequently, as the survey reveals,
most of them are still singles.

Another of the questions addressed is the sensitive
problem of housing, a major challenge facing Cuban
society as a whole, and which is also experienced
by youth. More than the 50 percent of them live
in houses with construction problems.

Interviewees complained about space and structural
conditions of their houses, considering them insufficient
for their development. Housing issues, family dependence
and a lack of privacy are their principal dilemmas.

Still, it’s revealing that 72.3 percent have their
own room or a minimally shared room. Overcrowding
tends to be more frequent in substandard housing.

The Pocket Economy

Although the Cuban economy moved forward and overcame
the harsh recession of the 1990s, people’s pockets
didn’t seem to catch up that fast. The household budget
of Cubans must still adjust to shortages.

Most interviewees are economically dependent on
other people. Most of them live in the eastern
region of the island, are women and range between
the ages of 15 and 29.

The survey demonstrated that youth spend their incomes
in the same way as the rest of the population: on food,
clothes, shoes, and household expenses. Women and young
adult share their income in accordance with other people’s
needs or with those of the home.

Seeking the Other Half

Some youngsters read through the horoscope to learn
of their fortune in affairs of the heart, or to look
for secret aphrodisiacs or some other sort of aid to
make them luckier in their pursuits. If you ask them
about one of their main goals, with no hesitation they
will answer: finding a partner. The same sentiments
were expressed by the investigators, especially the
women. They give top priority to this goal. Meanwhile
youth over 25 vehemently defended the right to be single.

Love and common likes are fundamental to a successful
relationship, asserted the youth, with all agreeing
that this was regardless of sex or age.

Regarding the prior study (the Second National Survey
of Youth), some of the youth’s priorities have shifted
in importance. Having children, in particular, has
dropped from the third to the seventh position —
an alarming sign given the unbalanced aging of
Cuban society.

Issues of greatest interest for this cohort were
those related to employment, leisure, personal
problems and future plans.

Employment on the Mind

The study demonstrated that over the 36 percent
of youth are students, while high school graduates
are 50 percent of this population and university
graduates 35.5 percent.

The largest part of the younger generation are
workers (37.7 percent). This group is made up mainly
of manual laborers, technicians, and service workers
— most of them working for the government.

When the study was carried out, most unemployed youth
spent their time doing house chores; the rest could
be divided into two groups: those who didn’t work
or study and those actively looking for employment.

Just as in the second national survey, the state
sector —along with the developing sector (tourism,
joint ventures, and publicly-run corporations) —
continue to be the most popular among youth.

Interviewees say their choice of field of employment
is closely related to the country’s economic situation,
the search for better working conditions as well
as the pay offered.

Prejudices and Stereotypes

Although hardly no teenagers and youth said they
had experienced rejection or mistreatment, they
highlighted certain prejudices and stereotypes that
go against the principles of Cuba’s socialist system.

A small number had experienced rejection within
society, owing to difference of opinion, their
economic situation, sex, or skin color.

Racial stereotypes have promoted discriminatory
behavior among adolescence and youth, especially
within the family and among couples.

The availability and use of free time was also
underlined as a problem. The majority said to have
little options for leisure. Likewise, there is a
tendency to fulfill those needs using personal
resources and not those provided by the government.

The primary aspirations of adolescence and youth
regarding family, studies, and employment go hand
in hand with the principles of Cuban society. Their
main aspirations are to find a partner, to strengthen
their present relationship, to go to college and work
in a field that allows them to satisfy their spiritual
and material needs.

Youth shift between reality and longings, between
dilemmas and the dreams of solving them. Cuban youth,
with its contradictions and challenges, is constructing
the destiny of our country — leading the way to humanism,
like the morning precedes the day.

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*


LINKS AND VERY SHORT STORIES

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Robert Fisk: Divide and rule - America's plan for Baghdad
"Revealed: a new counter-insurgency strategy to carve up
the city into sealed areas. The tactic failed in Vietnam.
So what chance does it have in Iraq?"
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/article2439530.ece

Published: 11 April 2007

Refugees Speak of Escape from Hell
Inter Press Service
Dahr Jamail
"DAMASCUS, Apr 11 (IPS) - Refugees from Iraq scattered
around Damascus describe hellish conditions in the country
they managed to leave behind."
April 11, 2007
http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/hard_news/archives/syria/000565.php#more

Manhattan: Leash-Free Dogs at Night in City Parks
By TIMOTHY WILLIAMS
The Parks and Recreation Department announced yesterday
that a policy of allowing dogs off leashes during overnight
hours will become effective next month. Beginning May 10,
owners with a license and proof of a current rabies
vaccination will be permitted to let their dogs roam
in designated areas of city parks from 9 p.m. to 9 a.m.
Under an unofficial policy, the department has for years
not given tickets to dog owners who let their pets run
free at night in parks.
April 11, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/11/nyregion/11mbrfs-dogs.html

How Trees Might Not Be Green in Carbon Offsetting Debate
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/10/443/

There is climate change censorship - and it's the
deniers who dish it out
"Global warming scientists are under intense pressure
to water down findings, and are then accused
of silencing their critics."
George Monbiot
Tuesday April 10, 2007
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2053521,00.html

American Tortured in Iraq Sues Rumsfeld
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040907J.shtml

And These Refugees Are Lucky
http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/hard_news/archives/syria/000561.php#more

Bush Renews Effort on Immigration Plan
By DAVID STOUT
April 9, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/washington/09cnd-prexy.html?hp

Ranchers and Army Are at Odds in Old West
By DAN FROSCH
"DENVER, April 6 — Mack Louden worries that his 30,000-acre
ranch sits in the cross hairs of the Army’s plans to expand
its Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site at Fort Carson, and he, along
with other Colorado ranchers, are increasingly upset
about the idea.
'Where we live, how we live, it’s all going to die a slow death
if the Army gets our land,' said Mr. Louden, a fourth-
generation rancher from Las Animas County, along the
southern edge of the state."
April 9, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/09/us/09hearing.html?ref=washington

Big Coal Invokes Reverse Nuremberg Defense
Massey Energy's CEO: Just Giving Orders, Not Carrying Them Out
By CORPORATE CRIME REPORTER
April 9, 2007
http://www.counterpunch.com/ccr04092007.html

The political situation in Venezuela – interview
with Yonie Moreno, member of the CMR in Venezuela
By Yonnie Moreno
Monday, 09 April 2007
www.handsoffvenezuela.org/political_situation_venezuela_moreno.htm

FOCUS | US Warplanes Attack Shiites as Civil War Rages in Iraq
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040807Z.shtml

FOCUS | Thousands in LA Demand Immigrant Rights
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040807Y.shtml

Pesticides Linked to Honeybee Population Decline
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_4279.cfm

Executive Pay: A Special Report
More Pieces. Still a Puzzle.
By ERIC DASH
April 8, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/business/yourmoney/08pay.html?ref=business

Matt Renner | Pentagon Office Created Phony Intel on Iraq/al-Qaeda Link
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040607A.shtml

Number of US Uninsured Soars, Along with Big Pharma Profits
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/06/343/

Wolfowitz Accused of Nepotism at World Bank
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/06/341/

Leading article: The world's biggest polluters
can no longer ignore the evidence
Climate change presents one of the most serious
threats ever faced by human life on the planet
Published: 07 April 2007
http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article2430107.ece

Colombian Conflict Spills Across its Venezuelan Border
By: Humberto Márquez - IPS
Wednesday, Apr 04, 2007
www.venezuelanalysis.com/articles.php?artno=2007

FOCUS | Scientific Panel Issues Devastating Climate Change Report
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040707Z.shtml

What If Iran Had Invaded Mexico?
Putting the Iran Crisis in Context
By Noam Chomsky
"The debate over Iranian interference in Iraq proceeds
without ridicule on the assumption that the United States
owns the world. We did not, for example, engage
in a similar debate in the 1980s about whether
the U.S. was interfering in Soviet-occupied Afghanistan."
04/06/07
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17491.htm

A civil rights revolution with 'netroots' origins
"A14-year-old black girl from tiny Paris, Texas, was sent
to a youth prison for up to seven years for shoving
a hall monitor at her high school.
The same judge sentenced a 14-year-old white girl
to probation for burning down her family's house."
April 5, 2007
http://www.insidebayarea.com/opinion/ci_5599216

Questions Linger About Bushes and BCCI Bank
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/05/326/

Canadian Seal Hunt Opens Again Amidst Outcry
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/05/332/

World Health Day: How Much Can Iraq Survive
Inter Press Service
Ali al-Fadhily
http://dahrjamailiraq.com
http://uruknet.info/?p=m31918&s1=h1
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=37236

Federal Official in Student Loans Held Loan Stock
By JONATHAN D. GLATER and KAREN W. ARENSON
April 6, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/06/education/06loans.html?hp

Pope's book accuses rich nations of robbery
· Benedict hails Marx's analysis of modern man
· Publication planned for 80th birthday
John Hooper in Rome
Guardian
"Pope Benedict appeared to reach out to the anti-globalisation
movement yesterday, attacking rich nations for having
"plundered and sacked" Africa and other poor regions
of the world.
An extract published from his first book since being elected
pope highlighted the passionately anti-materialistic and
anti-capitalist aspects of his thinking. Unexpectedly,
the Pope also approvingly cited Karl Marx and his analysis
of contemporary man as a victim of alienation."
April 5, 2007
http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,,2050255,00.html

None of the Democratic Contenders Has Called for the
Closure of the Guantanamo Prison Of Confessions and Torture
By MARGARET KIMBERLY
April 4, 2007
http://www.counterpunch.com/kimberly04042007.html

Quota Quickly Filled on Visas for High-Tech Guest Workers
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The federal Citizenship and Immigration Services reached
its 2008 limit for skilled-worker visa petitions in a single
day and says it will not accept any more, to the dismay
of technology companies that rely on the visas to hire
foreign employees.
The agency began accepting petitions Monday for the fiscal
year starting Oct. 1 and said it received about 150,000
applications by midafternoon.
The temporary H-1B visas are for foreign workers with
high-technology skills or in specialty occupations.
Congress has mandated that the immigration agency
limit the visas granted to 65,000, although the cap
does not apply to petitions made on behalf of current
H-1B holders, and an additional 20,000 visas can be
granted to applicants who hold advanced degrees from
American academic institutions.
The agency said it would use computers to pick visa
recipients randomly from the applications received
Monday and Tuesday. It will reject the rest of the
applications and return the filing fees.
Employers seek H-1B visas on behalf of scientists,
engineers, computer programmers and other workers
with theoretical or technical expertise. About one-
third of Microsoft’s 46,000 employees in the United
States have work visas or are legal permanent residents
with green cards, said Ginny Terzano, a spokeswoman
for the company.
“We are trying to work with Congress to get the cap
increased,” Ms. Terzano said. “Our real preference
here is that there not be a cap at all.”
Compete America, a coalition that includes Microsoft,
the chip maker Intel, the business software company
Oracle and others, voiced its opposition to the
visa cap in a statement Tuesday.
“Our broken visa policies for highly educated foreign
professionals are not only counterproductive, they
are anticompetitive and detrimental to America’s
long-term economic competitiveness,” said Robert
E. Hoffman, an Oracle vice president and co-chairman
of Compete America.
April 5, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/business/05visa.html

California: Plea for a Shorter Sentence
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The lawyer and parents of John Walker Lindh, the American-
born Taliban soldier serving 20 years in prison after his
capture in Afghanistan, called on President Bush to commute
his sentence and set him free. The renewed call to shorten
the sentence was based on a nine-month term that David Hicks,
an Australian, received Saturday after pleading guilty to
supporting terrorism. “In the atmosphere of the time, the
best John could get was a plea bargain and a 20-year
sentence,” said Mr. Lindh’s father, Frank Lindh. The White
House did not return a call seeking comment.
April 5, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/us/05brfs-PLEAFORASHOR_BRF.html

Castro Again Chides U.S. on Ethanol Plan
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
HAVANA, April 4 (AP) — The ailing Cuban leader Fidel
Castro returned to the public debate — if not view —
for the second time in less than a week on Wednesday
with a column in the Communist Party newspaper Granma.
Mr. Castro, 80, chided the Bush administration for its
support of ethanol production for automobiles, a move
that he said would leave the world’s poor hungry.
It was his second article on the issue in less than
a week, indicating that he is increasingly eager to
have his voice heard on international matters, eight
months after stepping down as Cuba’s president because
of illness.
Cuba has experimented with using sugar cane for ethanol
production, but now that the United States has embraced
the idea, Mr. Castro and his ally Hugo Chávez, the
president of Venezuela, have expressed concern that
rich countries will buy up the food crops of poor nations
to meet their energy needs, threatening millions with
starvation.
April 5, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/world/americas/05cuba.html

Havana rights
Calvin Tucker
March 28, 2007 8:30 PM
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/calvin_tucker/2007/03/the_street_sce
ne_was_entertain.html

Marking Time, Making Do
By JOHN FREEMAN GILL
NY Times, April 1, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/nyregion/thecity/01subw.html

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND INFORMATION
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

DEMAND THE RELEASE OF SAMI AL-ARIAN

The National Council of Arab Americans (NCA) demands the immediate
release of political prisoner, Dr. Sami Al-Arian. Although
Dr. Al-Arian is no longer on a hunger strike we must still demand
he be released by the US Department of Justice (DOJ). After an earlier
plea agreement that absolved Dr. Al-Arian from any further questioning,
he was sentenced up to 18 months in jail for refusing to testify before
a grand jury in Virginia. He has long sense served his time yet
Dr. Al-Arian is still being held. Release him now!

See:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/16/1410255

ACTION:

We ask all people of conscience to demand the immediate
release and end to Dr. Al- Arian's suffering.

Call, Email and Write:

1- Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Fax Number: (202) 307-6777
Email: AskDOJ@usdoj.gov

2- The Honorable John Conyers, Jr
2426 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-5126
(202) 225-0072 Fax
John.Conyers@mail.house.gov

3- Senator Patrick Leahy
433 Russell Senate Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
(202)224-4242
senator_leahy@leahy.senate.gov

4- Honorable Judge Gerald Lee
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
401 Courthouse Square, Alexandria, VA 22314
March 22, 2007
[No email given...bw]

National Council of Arab Americans (NCA)
http://www.arab-american.net/

Criminalizing Solidarity: Sami Al-Arian and the War of
Terror
By Charlotte Kates, The Electronic Intifada, 4 April 2007
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article6767.shtml

Related:

Robert Fisk: The true story of free speech in America
This systematic censorship of Middle East reality
continues even in schools
Published: 07 April 2007
http://news. independent. co.uk/world/ fisk/article2430 125.ece

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

[For some levity...Hans Groiner plays Monk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51bsCRv6kI0
...bw]

Excerpt of interview between Barbara Walters and Hugo Chavez
http://www.borev.net/2007/03/what_you_had_something_better.html

Which country should we invade next?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3g_zqz3VjY

My Favorite Mutiny, The Coup
http://www.myspace.com/thecoupmusic

Michael Moore- The Awful Truth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeOaTpYl8mE

Morse v. Frederick Supreme Court arguments
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_LsGoDWC0o

Free Speech 4 Students Rally - Media Montage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfCjfod8yuw

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

'My son lived a worthwhile life'
In April 2003, 21-year old Tom Hurndall was shot in the head
in Gaza by an Israeli soldier as he tried to save the lives of three
small children. Nine months later, he died, having never
recovered consciousness. Emine Saner talks to his mother
Jocelyn about her grief, her fight to make the Israeli army
accountable for his death and the book she has written
in his memory.
Monday March 26, 2007
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,2042968,00.html

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Introducing...................the Apple iRack
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-KWYYIY4jQ

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

"A War Budget Leaves Every Child Behind."
[A T-shirt worn by some teachers at Roosevelt High School
in L.A. as part of their campaign to rid the school of military
recruiters and JROTC--see Article in Full item number 4, below...bw]

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

THIS IS AN EXCELLENT VIDEO DESTRIBUTED BY U.S. LABOR AGAINST
THE WAR (USLAW) FEATURING SPEAKERS AT THE JANUARY 27TH
MARCH ON WASHINGTON FOCUSING ON THE DEMAND - BRING
THE TROOPS HOME NOW.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6935451906479097836&hl=en

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Defend the Los Angeles Eight!
http://www.committee4justice.com/

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

George Takai responds to Tim Hardaway's homophobic remarks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcJoJZIcQW4&eurl_

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Iran
http://www.lucasgray.com/video/peacetrain.html

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Another view of the war. A link from Amer Jubran
http://d3130.servadmin.com/~leeflash/

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Petition: Halt the Blue Angels
http://action.globalexchange.org/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=458
http://www.care2.com/c2c/share/detail/289327

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

A Girl Like Me
7:08 min
Youth Documentary
Kiri Davis, Director, Reel Works Teen Filmmaking, Producer
Winner of the Diversity Award
Sponsored by Third Millennium Foundation
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1091431409617440489

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Film/Song about Angola
http://www.prisonactivist.org/angola/

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

"200 million children in the world sleep in the streets today.
Not one of them is Cuban."
(A sign in Havana)
Venceremos
View sign at bottom of page at:
http://www.cubasolidarity.net/index.html
[Thanks to Norma Harrison for sending this...bw]

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

"Cheyenne and Arapaho oral histories hammer history's account of the
Sand Creek Massacre"

CENTENNIAL, CO -- A new documentary film based on an award-winning
documentary short film, "The Sand Creek Massacre", and driven by
Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho people who tell their version about
what happened during the Sand Creek Massacre via their oral
histories, has been released by Olympus Films+, LLC, a Centennial,
Colorado film company.

"You have done an extraordinary job" said Margie Small, Tobient
Entertainment, " on the Colorado PBS episode, the library videos for
public schools and libraries, the trailer, etc...and getting the
story told and giving honor to those ancestors who had to witness
this tragic and brutal attack...film is one of the best ways."

"The images shown in the film were selected for native awareness
value" said Donald L. Vasicek, award-winning writer/filmmaker, "we
also focused on preserving American history on film because tribal
elders are dying and taking their oral histories with them. The film
shows a non-violent solution to problem-solving and 19th century
Colorado history, so it's multi-dimensional in that sense. "

Chief Eugene Blackbear, Sr., Cheyenne, who starred as Chief Black
Kettle in "The Last of the Dogmen" also starring Tom Berenger and
Barbara Hershey and "Dr. Colorado", Tom Noel, University of Colorado
history professor, are featured.

The trailer can be viewed and the film can be ordered for $24.95 plus
$4.95 for shipping and handling at http://www.fullduck.com/node/53.

Vasicek's web site, http://www.donvasicek.com, provides detailed
information about the Sand Creek Massacre including various still
images particularly on the Sand Creek Massacre home page and on the
proposal page.

Olympus Films+, LLC is dedicated to writing and producing quality
products that serve to educate others about the human condition.

Contact:

Donald L. Vasicek
Olympus Films+, LLC
7078 South Fairfax Street
Centennial, CO 80122
http://us.imdb.com/Name?Vasicek,+Don
http://www.donvasicek.com
dvasicek@earthlink.net
303-903-2103

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

A NEW LOOK AT U.S. RADIOACTIVE WEAPONS
Join us in a campaign to expose and stop the use
of these illegal weapons
http://poisondust.org/

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

You may enjoy watching these.
In struggle
Che:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqcezl9dD2c
Leon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukkFVV5X0p4

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

FIGHTBACK! A Collection of Socialist Essays
By Sylvia Weinstein
http://www.walterlippmann.com/sylvia-weinstein-fightback-intro.html

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

[The Scab
"After God had finished the rattlesnake, the toad,
and the vampire, he had some awful substance left with
which he made a scab."
"A scab is a two-legged animal with a corkscrew soul,
a water brain, a combination backbone of jelly and glue.
Where others have hearts, he carries a tumor of rotten
principles." "When a scab comes down the street,
men turn their backs and angels weep in heaven, and
the devil shuts the gates of hell to keep him out."
"No man (or woman) has a right to scab so long as there
is a pool of water to drown his carcass in,
or a rope long enough to hang his body with.
Judas was a gentleman compared with a scab.
For betraying his master, he had character enough
to hang himself." A scab has not.
"Esau sold his birthright for a mess of pottage.
Judas sold his Savior for thirty pieces of silver.
Benedict Arnold sold his country for a promise of
a commision in the british army."
The scab sells his birthright, country, his wife,
his children and his fellowmen for an unfulfilled
promise from his employer.
Esau was a traitor to himself; Judas was a traitor
to his God; Benedict Arnold was a traitor to his country;
a scab is a traitor to his God, his country,
his family and his class."
Author --- Jack London (1876-1916)...Roland Sheppard
http://web.mac.com/rolandgarret]

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

END ALL U.S. AID TO ISRAEL!
Stop funding Israel's war against Palestine
Complete the form at the website listed below with your information.
https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Advocacy?
JServSessionIdr003=cga2p2o6x1.app2a&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=177

*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

Sand Creek Massacre
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FEATURED AT NATIVE AMERICAN FILM FESTIVAL:
http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/local/16035305.htm
(scroll down when you get there])
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING
WRITER/FILMMAKER DONALD L. VASICEK REPORT:
http://www.digitalcinemareport.com/sandcreekmassacre.html
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FINALIST IN DOCUMENTARY CHANNEL COMPETITION (VIEW HERE):
http://www.docupyx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=28&Itemid=41
VIEW "THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FILM MOVIE OF THE WEEK FOR FREE HERE:
http://twymancreative.com/twymanc.html

On November 29, 1864, 700 Colorado troops savagely slaughtered
over 450 Cheyenne children, disabled, elders, and women in the
southeastern Colorado Territory under its protection. This act
became known as the Sand Creek Massacre. This film project
("The Sand Creek Massacre" documentary film project) is an
examination of an open wound in the souls of the Cheyenne
people as told from their perspective. This project chronicles
that horrific 19th century event and its affect on the 21st century
struggle for respectful coexistence between white and native
plains cultures in the United States of America.

Listed below are links on which you can click to get the latest news,
products, and view, free, "THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" award-
winning documentary short. In order to create more native
awareness, particularly to save the roots of America's history,
please read the following:

Some people in America are trying to save the world. Bless
them. In the meantime, the roots of America are dying.
What happens to a plant when the roots die? The plant dies
according to my biology teacher in high school. American's
roots are its native people. Many of America's native people
are dying from drug and alcohol abuse, poverty, hunger,
and disease, which was introduced to them by the Caucasian
male. Tribal elders are dying. When they die, their oral
histories go with them. Our native's oral histories are the
essence of the roots of America, what took place before
our ancestors came over to America, what is taking place,
and what will be taking place. It is time we replenish
America's roots with native awareness, else America
continues its decaying, and ultimately, its death.

You can help. The 22-MINUTE SAND CREEK MASSACRE
DOCUMENTARY PRESENTATION/EDUCATIONAL DVD IS
READY FOR PURCHASE! (pass the word about this powerful
educational tool to friends, family, schools, parents, teachers,
and other related people and organizations to contact
me (dvasicek@earthlink.net, 303-903-2103) for information
about how they can purchase the DVD and have me come
to their children's school to show the film and to interact
in a questions and answers discussion about the Sand
Creek Massacre.

Happy Holidays!

Donald L. Vasicek
Olympus Films+, LLC
http://us.imdb.com/Name?Vasicek,+Don
http://www.donvasicek.com
dvasicek@earthlink.net
303-903-2103

"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FEATURED AT NATIVE AMERICAN FILM FESTIVAL:
http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/local/16035305.htm
(scroll down when you get there])
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING
WRITER/FILMMAKER DONALD L. VASICEK REPORT:
http://www.digitalcinemareport.com/sandcreekmassacre.html
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FINALIST IN DOCUMENTARY CHANNEL COMPETITION (VIEW HERE):
http://www.docupyx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=28&Itemid=41
VIEW "THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FILM MOVIE OF THE WEEK FOR FREE HERE:
http://twymancreative.com/twymanc.html

SHOP:
http://www.manataka.org/page633.html
BuyIndies.com
donvasicek.com.